Cargando…
Clinical implications of next‐generation sequencing‐based panel tests for malignant ovarian tumors
Precision medicine based on cancer genomics is being applied in clinical practice. However, patients do not always derive benefits from genomic testing. Here, we performed targeted amplicon exome sequencing‐based panel tests, including 160 cancer‐related genes (PleSSision‐160), on 88 malignant ovari...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7571820/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32813918 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3383 |
_version_ | 1783597225362849792 |
---|---|
author | Saotome, Keiko Chiyoda, Tatsuyuki Aimono, Eriko Nakamura, Kohei Tanishima, Shigeki Nohara, Sachio Okada, Chihiro Hayashi, Hideyuki Kuroda, Yuka Nomura, Hiroyuki Susumu, Nobuyuki Iwata, Takashi Yamagami, Wataru Kataoka, Fumio Nishihara, Hiroshi Aoki, Daisuke |
author_facet | Saotome, Keiko Chiyoda, Tatsuyuki Aimono, Eriko Nakamura, Kohei Tanishima, Shigeki Nohara, Sachio Okada, Chihiro Hayashi, Hideyuki Kuroda, Yuka Nomura, Hiroyuki Susumu, Nobuyuki Iwata, Takashi Yamagami, Wataru Kataoka, Fumio Nishihara, Hiroshi Aoki, Daisuke |
author_sort | Saotome, Keiko |
collection | PubMed |
description | Precision medicine based on cancer genomics is being applied in clinical practice. However, patients do not always derive benefits from genomic testing. Here, we performed targeted amplicon exome sequencing‐based panel tests, including 160 cancer‐related genes (PleSSision‐160), on 88 malignant ovarian tumors (high‐grade serous carcinoma, 27; endometrioid carcinoma, 15; clear cell carcinoma, 30; mucinous carcinoma, 6; undifferentiated carcinoma, 4; and others, 6 (immature teratoma, 1; carcinosarcoma, 3; squamous cell carcinoma, 1; and mixed, 1)), to assess treatment strategies and useful biomarkers for malignant ovarian tumors. Overall, actionable gene variants were found in 90.9%, and druggable gene variants were found in 40.9% of the cases. Actionable BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants were found in 4.5% of each of the cases. ERBB2 amplification was found in 33.3% of mucinous carcinoma cases. Druggable hypermutation/ultramutation (tumor mutation burden ≥ 10 SNVs/Mbp) was found in 7.4% of high‐grade serous carcinoma, 46.7% of endometrioid carcinoma, 10% of clear cell carcinoma, 0% of mucinous carcinoma, 25% of undifferentiated carcinoma, and 33.3% of the other cancer cases. Copy number alterations were significantly higher in high‐grade serous carcinoma (P < .005) than in other histologic subtypes; some clear cell carcinoma showed high copy number alterations that were correlated with advanced stage (P < .05) and worse survival (P < .01). A high count of copy number alteration was associated with worse survival in all malignant ovarian tumors (P < .05). Our study shows that targeted agents can be detected in approximately 40% of malignant ovarian tumors via multigene panel testing, and copy number alteration count can be a useful marker to help assess risks in malignant ovarian tumor patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7571820 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75718202020-10-23 Clinical implications of next‐generation sequencing‐based panel tests for malignant ovarian tumors Saotome, Keiko Chiyoda, Tatsuyuki Aimono, Eriko Nakamura, Kohei Tanishima, Shigeki Nohara, Sachio Okada, Chihiro Hayashi, Hideyuki Kuroda, Yuka Nomura, Hiroyuki Susumu, Nobuyuki Iwata, Takashi Yamagami, Wataru Kataoka, Fumio Nishihara, Hiroshi Aoki, Daisuke Cancer Med Clinical Cancer Research Precision medicine based on cancer genomics is being applied in clinical practice. However, patients do not always derive benefits from genomic testing. Here, we performed targeted amplicon exome sequencing‐based panel tests, including 160 cancer‐related genes (PleSSision‐160), on 88 malignant ovarian tumors (high‐grade serous carcinoma, 27; endometrioid carcinoma, 15; clear cell carcinoma, 30; mucinous carcinoma, 6; undifferentiated carcinoma, 4; and others, 6 (immature teratoma, 1; carcinosarcoma, 3; squamous cell carcinoma, 1; and mixed, 1)), to assess treatment strategies and useful biomarkers for malignant ovarian tumors. Overall, actionable gene variants were found in 90.9%, and druggable gene variants were found in 40.9% of the cases. Actionable BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants were found in 4.5% of each of the cases. ERBB2 amplification was found in 33.3% of mucinous carcinoma cases. Druggable hypermutation/ultramutation (tumor mutation burden ≥ 10 SNVs/Mbp) was found in 7.4% of high‐grade serous carcinoma, 46.7% of endometrioid carcinoma, 10% of clear cell carcinoma, 0% of mucinous carcinoma, 25% of undifferentiated carcinoma, and 33.3% of the other cancer cases. Copy number alterations were significantly higher in high‐grade serous carcinoma (P < .005) than in other histologic subtypes; some clear cell carcinoma showed high copy number alterations that were correlated with advanced stage (P < .05) and worse survival (P < .01). A high count of copy number alteration was associated with worse survival in all malignant ovarian tumors (P < .05). Our study shows that targeted agents can be detected in approximately 40% of malignant ovarian tumors via multigene panel testing, and copy number alteration count can be a useful marker to help assess risks in malignant ovarian tumor patients. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7571820/ /pubmed/32813918 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3383 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Cancer Research Saotome, Keiko Chiyoda, Tatsuyuki Aimono, Eriko Nakamura, Kohei Tanishima, Shigeki Nohara, Sachio Okada, Chihiro Hayashi, Hideyuki Kuroda, Yuka Nomura, Hiroyuki Susumu, Nobuyuki Iwata, Takashi Yamagami, Wataru Kataoka, Fumio Nishihara, Hiroshi Aoki, Daisuke Clinical implications of next‐generation sequencing‐based panel tests for malignant ovarian tumors |
title | Clinical implications of next‐generation sequencing‐based panel tests for malignant ovarian tumors |
title_full | Clinical implications of next‐generation sequencing‐based panel tests for malignant ovarian tumors |
title_fullStr | Clinical implications of next‐generation sequencing‐based panel tests for malignant ovarian tumors |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical implications of next‐generation sequencing‐based panel tests for malignant ovarian tumors |
title_short | Clinical implications of next‐generation sequencing‐based panel tests for malignant ovarian tumors |
title_sort | clinical implications of next‐generation sequencing‐based panel tests for malignant ovarian tumors |
topic | Clinical Cancer Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7571820/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32813918 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3383 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT saotomekeiko clinicalimplicationsofnextgenerationsequencingbasedpaneltestsformalignantovariantumors AT chiyodatatsuyuki clinicalimplicationsofnextgenerationsequencingbasedpaneltestsformalignantovariantumors AT aimonoeriko clinicalimplicationsofnextgenerationsequencingbasedpaneltestsformalignantovariantumors AT nakamurakohei clinicalimplicationsofnextgenerationsequencingbasedpaneltestsformalignantovariantumors AT tanishimashigeki clinicalimplicationsofnextgenerationsequencingbasedpaneltestsformalignantovariantumors AT noharasachio clinicalimplicationsofnextgenerationsequencingbasedpaneltestsformalignantovariantumors AT okadachihiro clinicalimplicationsofnextgenerationsequencingbasedpaneltestsformalignantovariantumors AT hayashihideyuki clinicalimplicationsofnextgenerationsequencingbasedpaneltestsformalignantovariantumors AT kurodayuka clinicalimplicationsofnextgenerationsequencingbasedpaneltestsformalignantovariantumors AT nomurahiroyuki clinicalimplicationsofnextgenerationsequencingbasedpaneltestsformalignantovariantumors AT susumunobuyuki clinicalimplicationsofnextgenerationsequencingbasedpaneltestsformalignantovariantumors AT iwatatakashi clinicalimplicationsofnextgenerationsequencingbasedpaneltestsformalignantovariantumors AT yamagamiwataru clinicalimplicationsofnextgenerationsequencingbasedpaneltestsformalignantovariantumors AT kataokafumio clinicalimplicationsofnextgenerationsequencingbasedpaneltestsformalignantovariantumors AT nishiharahiroshi clinicalimplicationsofnextgenerationsequencingbasedpaneltestsformalignantovariantumors AT aokidaisuke clinicalimplicationsofnextgenerationsequencingbasedpaneltestsformalignantovariantumors |