Cargando…

Implant to Fat: A Breast Augmentation Technique Validated by BREAST-Q

Implant-based breast augmentation is the number one cosmetic procedure performed in the United States. However, it is associated with relatively high revision rates, reaching up to 24% at 4 years. This case series presents our experience in implant explantation with simultaneous breast augmentation...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tahseen, Hossam, Fayek, Mina, Emara, Dawlat, Taha, Ahmed A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7571938/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33133909
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002859
Descripción
Sumario:Implant-based breast augmentation is the number one cosmetic procedure performed in the United States. However, it is associated with relatively high revision rates, reaching up to 24% at 4 years. This case series presents our experience in implant explantation with simultaneous breast augmentation using fat. METHODS: This case series was conducted by the authors in Cairo, Egypt, during the period from January 2018 to June 2019. Following a detailed data collection, careful physical examination was done. Implant-to fat conversion was done for all cases. None of the cases needed >1 session of fat injection following the implant removal. Size of the implants removed ranged from 200 -350 cm(3) (average of 310). Volume of fat injected ranged from 300 to 550 ml (average of 430). Patients' satisfaction was evaluated using the BREAST-Q questionnaire. RESULTS: Twenty patients were included, with a mean age of presentation of 33.1 years (range, 26 -42 years; SD, 5.3). Mean body mass index was 26.9 kg/m2 (range, 24 -30; SD, 1.9). Implant complications were as follows: capsular contracture (10cases), implant migration (3 cases), breast asymmetry (3 cases), poor aesthetic outcome (3 cases), and palpable implant (1 case). Overall patient's satisfaction was evaluated by the BREAST-Q 1-year following surgery. The overall satisfaction score was 3.8, where a score of 4 indicates very satisfied and a score of 1 indicates very dissatisfied. CONCLUSIONS: Implant-to-fat conversion is a good option for complicated breast implant cases, with good long-term results and excellent patient’s satisfaction as verified by the BREAST-Q.