Cargando…
Implant to Fat: A Breast Augmentation Technique Validated by BREAST-Q
Implant-based breast augmentation is the number one cosmetic procedure performed in the United States. However, it is associated with relatively high revision rates, reaching up to 24% at 4 years. This case series presents our experience in implant explantation with simultaneous breast augmentation...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7571938/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33133909 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002859 |
_version_ | 1783597246621679616 |
---|---|
author | Tahseen, Hossam Fayek, Mina Emara, Dawlat Taha, Ahmed A. |
author_facet | Tahseen, Hossam Fayek, Mina Emara, Dawlat Taha, Ahmed A. |
author_sort | Tahseen, Hossam |
collection | PubMed |
description | Implant-based breast augmentation is the number one cosmetic procedure performed in the United States. However, it is associated with relatively high revision rates, reaching up to 24% at 4 years. This case series presents our experience in implant explantation with simultaneous breast augmentation using fat. METHODS: This case series was conducted by the authors in Cairo, Egypt, during the period from January 2018 to June 2019. Following a detailed data collection, careful physical examination was done. Implant-to fat conversion was done for all cases. None of the cases needed >1 session of fat injection following the implant removal. Size of the implants removed ranged from 200 -350 cm(3) (average of 310). Volume of fat injected ranged from 300 to 550 ml (average of 430). Patients' satisfaction was evaluated using the BREAST-Q questionnaire. RESULTS: Twenty patients were included, with a mean age of presentation of 33.1 years (range, 26 -42 years; SD, 5.3). Mean body mass index was 26.9 kg/m2 (range, 24 -30; SD, 1.9). Implant complications were as follows: capsular contracture (10cases), implant migration (3 cases), breast asymmetry (3 cases), poor aesthetic outcome (3 cases), and palpable implant (1 case). Overall patient's satisfaction was evaluated by the BREAST-Q 1-year following surgery. The overall satisfaction score was 3.8, where a score of 4 indicates very satisfied and a score of 1 indicates very dissatisfied. CONCLUSIONS: Implant-to-fat conversion is a good option for complicated breast implant cases, with good long-term results and excellent patient’s satisfaction as verified by the BREAST-Q. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7571938 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75719382020-10-29 Implant to Fat: A Breast Augmentation Technique Validated by BREAST-Q Tahseen, Hossam Fayek, Mina Emara, Dawlat Taha, Ahmed A. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Original Article Implant-based breast augmentation is the number one cosmetic procedure performed in the United States. However, it is associated with relatively high revision rates, reaching up to 24% at 4 years. This case series presents our experience in implant explantation with simultaneous breast augmentation using fat. METHODS: This case series was conducted by the authors in Cairo, Egypt, during the period from January 2018 to June 2019. Following a detailed data collection, careful physical examination was done. Implant-to fat conversion was done for all cases. None of the cases needed >1 session of fat injection following the implant removal. Size of the implants removed ranged from 200 -350 cm(3) (average of 310). Volume of fat injected ranged from 300 to 550 ml (average of 430). Patients' satisfaction was evaluated using the BREAST-Q questionnaire. RESULTS: Twenty patients were included, with a mean age of presentation of 33.1 years (range, 26 -42 years; SD, 5.3). Mean body mass index was 26.9 kg/m2 (range, 24 -30; SD, 1.9). Implant complications were as follows: capsular contracture (10cases), implant migration (3 cases), breast asymmetry (3 cases), poor aesthetic outcome (3 cases), and palpable implant (1 case). Overall patient's satisfaction was evaluated by the BREAST-Q 1-year following surgery. The overall satisfaction score was 3.8, where a score of 4 indicates very satisfied and a score of 1 indicates very dissatisfied. CONCLUSIONS: Implant-to-fat conversion is a good option for complicated breast implant cases, with good long-term results and excellent patient’s satisfaction as verified by the BREAST-Q. Wolters Kluwer Health 2020-05-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7571938/ /pubmed/33133909 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002859 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Tahseen, Hossam Fayek, Mina Emara, Dawlat Taha, Ahmed A. Implant to Fat: A Breast Augmentation Technique Validated by BREAST-Q |
title | Implant to Fat: A Breast Augmentation Technique Validated by BREAST-Q |
title_full | Implant to Fat: A Breast Augmentation Technique Validated by BREAST-Q |
title_fullStr | Implant to Fat: A Breast Augmentation Technique Validated by BREAST-Q |
title_full_unstemmed | Implant to Fat: A Breast Augmentation Technique Validated by BREAST-Q |
title_short | Implant to Fat: A Breast Augmentation Technique Validated by BREAST-Q |
title_sort | implant to fat: a breast augmentation technique validated by breast-q |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7571938/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33133909 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002859 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tahseenhossam implanttofatabreastaugmentationtechniquevalidatedbybreastq AT fayekmina implanttofatabreastaugmentationtechniquevalidatedbybreastq AT emaradawlat implanttofatabreastaugmentationtechniquevalidatedbybreastq AT tahaahmeda implanttofatabreastaugmentationtechniquevalidatedbybreastq |