Cargando…

Hypofractionated radiotherapy versus conventional radiotherapy for diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: The standard treatment for diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) is radiotherapy, although conventional fractionated radiotherapy (CFRT) may not be in the best interest of the patient. Instead, hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) may shorten the treatment period and reduce related cos...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Park, Jaehyeon, Yea, Ji Woon, Park, Jae Won
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7571996/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33080729
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000022721
_version_ 1783597257823617024
author Park, Jaehyeon
Yea, Ji Woon
Park, Jae Won
author_facet Park, Jaehyeon
Yea, Ji Woon
Park, Jae Won
author_sort Park, Jaehyeon
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The standard treatment for diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) is radiotherapy, although conventional fractionated radiotherapy (CFRT) may not be in the best interest of the patient. Instead, hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) may shorten the treatment period and reduce related costs for this treatment, which is typically palliative in nature. METHODS: This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated survival outcomes among patients who received HFRT or CFRT for DIPG. The PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register, and Scopus databases were searched to identify relevant studies. Overall survival was the primary outcome of interest and progression-free survival was the secondary outcome of interest. RESULTS: The search identified a total of 2376 reports, although only 4 reports were ultimately included in the meta-analysis. The studies included 88 patients who underwent HFRT and 96 patients who underwent CFRT. Relative to CFRT, HFRT provided comparable outcomes in terms of overall survival (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.07, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.77–1.47) and progression-free survival (HR: 1.04, 95% CI: 0.75–1.45). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this meta-analysis suggest that CFRT and HFRT provide similar survival outcomes for patients with DIPG.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7571996
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75719962020-10-29 Hypofractionated radiotherapy versus conventional radiotherapy for diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma: A systematic review and meta-analysis Park, Jaehyeon Yea, Ji Woon Park, Jae Won Medicine (Baltimore) 5700 BACKGROUND: The standard treatment for diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) is radiotherapy, although conventional fractionated radiotherapy (CFRT) may not be in the best interest of the patient. Instead, hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) may shorten the treatment period and reduce related costs for this treatment, which is typically palliative in nature. METHODS: This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated survival outcomes among patients who received HFRT or CFRT for DIPG. The PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register, and Scopus databases were searched to identify relevant studies. Overall survival was the primary outcome of interest and progression-free survival was the secondary outcome of interest. RESULTS: The search identified a total of 2376 reports, although only 4 reports were ultimately included in the meta-analysis. The studies included 88 patients who underwent HFRT and 96 patients who underwent CFRT. Relative to CFRT, HFRT provided comparable outcomes in terms of overall survival (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.07, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.77–1.47) and progression-free survival (HR: 1.04, 95% CI: 0.75–1.45). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this meta-analysis suggest that CFRT and HFRT provide similar survival outcomes for patients with DIPG. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7571996/ /pubmed/33080729 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000022721 Text en Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
spellingShingle 5700
Park, Jaehyeon
Yea, Ji Woon
Park, Jae Won
Hypofractionated radiotherapy versus conventional radiotherapy for diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title Hypofractionated radiotherapy versus conventional radiotherapy for diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Hypofractionated radiotherapy versus conventional radiotherapy for diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Hypofractionated radiotherapy versus conventional radiotherapy for diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Hypofractionated radiotherapy versus conventional radiotherapy for diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Hypofractionated radiotherapy versus conventional radiotherapy for diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort hypofractionated radiotherapy versus conventional radiotherapy for diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic 5700
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7571996/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33080729
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000022721
work_keys_str_mv AT parkjaehyeon hypofractionatedradiotherapyversusconventionalradiotherapyfordiffuseintrinsicpontinegliomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yeajiwoon hypofractionatedradiotherapyversusconventionalradiotherapyfordiffuseintrinsicpontinegliomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT parkjaewon hypofractionatedradiotherapyversusconventionalradiotherapyfordiffuseintrinsicpontinegliomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis