Cargando…

Postoperative rendezvous endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography as an option in the management of choledocholithiasis

BACKGROUND: Rendezvous endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography (ERCP) is a well-established method for treatment of choledocholithiasis. The primary aim of this study was to determine how different techniques for management of common bile duct stone (CBDS) clearance in patients undergoing c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Syrén, Eva-Lena, Sandblom, Gabriel, Eriksson, Staffan, Eklund, Arne, Isaksson, Bengt, Enochsson, Lars
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7572344/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31768727
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07272-1
_version_ 1783597321344253952
author Syrén, Eva-Lena
Sandblom, Gabriel
Eriksson, Staffan
Eklund, Arne
Isaksson, Bengt
Enochsson, Lars
author_facet Syrén, Eva-Lena
Sandblom, Gabriel
Eriksson, Staffan
Eklund, Arne
Isaksson, Bengt
Enochsson, Lars
author_sort Syrén, Eva-Lena
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Rendezvous endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography (ERCP) is a well-established method for treatment of choledocholithiasis. The primary aim of this study was to determine how different techniques for management of common bile duct stone (CBDS) clearance in patients undergoing cholecystectomy have changed over time at tertiary referral hospitals (TRH) and county/community hospitals (CH). The secondary aim was to see if postoperative rendezvous ERCP is a safe, effective and feasible alternative to intraoperative rendezvous ERCP in the management of CBDS. METHODS: Data were retrieved from the Swedish registry for cholecystectomy and ERCP (GallRiks) 2006–2016. All cholecystectomies, where CBDS were found at intraoperative cholangiography, and with complete 30-day follow-up (n = 10,386) were identified. Data concerning intraoperative and postoperative complications, readmission and reoperation within 30 days were retrieved for patients where intraoperative ERCP (n = 2290) and preparation for postoperative ERCP were performed (n = 2283). RESULTS: Intraoperative ERCP increased (7.5% 2006; 43.1% 2016) whereas preparation for postoperative ERCP decreased (21.2% 2006; 17.2% 2016) during 2006–2016. CBDS management differed between TRHs and CHs. Complications were higher in the postoperative rendezvous ERCP group: Odds Ratio [OR] 1.69 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.16–2.45) for intraoperative complications and OR 1.50 (CI 1.29–1.75) for postoperative complications. Intraoperative bleeding OR 2.46 (CI 1.17–5.16), postoperative bile leakage OR 1.89 (CI 1.23–2.90) and postoperative infection with abscess OR 1.55 (CI 1.05–2.29) were higher in the postoperative group. Neither post-ERCP pancreatitis, postoperative bleeding, cholangitis, percutaneous drainage, antibiotic treatment, ICU stay, readmission/reoperation within 30 days nor 30-day mortality differed between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Techniques for management of CBDS found at cholecystectomy have changed over time and differ between TRH and CH. Rendezvous ERCP is a safe and effective method. Even though intraoperative rendezvous ERCP is the preferred method, postoperative rendezvous ERCP constitutes an acceptable alternative where ERCP resources are lacking or limited.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7572344
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75723442020-10-21 Postoperative rendezvous endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography as an option in the management of choledocholithiasis Syrén, Eva-Lena Sandblom, Gabriel Eriksson, Staffan Eklund, Arne Isaksson, Bengt Enochsson, Lars Surg Endosc Article BACKGROUND: Rendezvous endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography (ERCP) is a well-established method for treatment of choledocholithiasis. The primary aim of this study was to determine how different techniques for management of common bile duct stone (CBDS) clearance in patients undergoing cholecystectomy have changed over time at tertiary referral hospitals (TRH) and county/community hospitals (CH). The secondary aim was to see if postoperative rendezvous ERCP is a safe, effective and feasible alternative to intraoperative rendezvous ERCP in the management of CBDS. METHODS: Data were retrieved from the Swedish registry for cholecystectomy and ERCP (GallRiks) 2006–2016. All cholecystectomies, where CBDS were found at intraoperative cholangiography, and with complete 30-day follow-up (n = 10,386) were identified. Data concerning intraoperative and postoperative complications, readmission and reoperation within 30 days were retrieved for patients where intraoperative ERCP (n = 2290) and preparation for postoperative ERCP were performed (n = 2283). RESULTS: Intraoperative ERCP increased (7.5% 2006; 43.1% 2016) whereas preparation for postoperative ERCP decreased (21.2% 2006; 17.2% 2016) during 2006–2016. CBDS management differed between TRHs and CHs. Complications were higher in the postoperative rendezvous ERCP group: Odds Ratio [OR] 1.69 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.16–2.45) for intraoperative complications and OR 1.50 (CI 1.29–1.75) for postoperative complications. Intraoperative bleeding OR 2.46 (CI 1.17–5.16), postoperative bile leakage OR 1.89 (CI 1.23–2.90) and postoperative infection with abscess OR 1.55 (CI 1.05–2.29) were higher in the postoperative group. Neither post-ERCP pancreatitis, postoperative bleeding, cholangitis, percutaneous drainage, antibiotic treatment, ICU stay, readmission/reoperation within 30 days nor 30-day mortality differed between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Techniques for management of CBDS found at cholecystectomy have changed over time and differ between TRH and CH. Rendezvous ERCP is a safe and effective method. Even though intraoperative rendezvous ERCP is the preferred method, postoperative rendezvous ERCP constitutes an acceptable alternative where ERCP resources are lacking or limited. Springer US 2019-11-25 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7572344/ /pubmed/31768727 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07272-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Article
Syrén, Eva-Lena
Sandblom, Gabriel
Eriksson, Staffan
Eklund, Arne
Isaksson, Bengt
Enochsson, Lars
Postoperative rendezvous endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography as an option in the management of choledocholithiasis
title Postoperative rendezvous endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography as an option in the management of choledocholithiasis
title_full Postoperative rendezvous endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography as an option in the management of choledocholithiasis
title_fullStr Postoperative rendezvous endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography as an option in the management of choledocholithiasis
title_full_unstemmed Postoperative rendezvous endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography as an option in the management of choledocholithiasis
title_short Postoperative rendezvous endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography as an option in the management of choledocholithiasis
title_sort postoperative rendezvous endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography as an option in the management of choledocholithiasis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7572344/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31768727
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07272-1
work_keys_str_mv AT syrenevalena postoperativerendezvousendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreaticographyasanoptioninthemanagementofcholedocholithiasis
AT sandblomgabriel postoperativerendezvousendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreaticographyasanoptioninthemanagementofcholedocholithiasis
AT erikssonstaffan postoperativerendezvousendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreaticographyasanoptioninthemanagementofcholedocholithiasis
AT eklundarne postoperativerendezvousendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreaticographyasanoptioninthemanagementofcholedocholithiasis
AT isakssonbengt postoperativerendezvousendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreaticographyasanoptioninthemanagementofcholedocholithiasis
AT enochssonlars postoperativerendezvousendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreaticographyasanoptioninthemanagementofcholedocholithiasis