Cargando…

Monitoring Immune Responses in IgA Nephropathy: Biomarkers to Guide Management

IgA nephropathy (IgAN) is the commonest biopsy-reported primary glomerulonephritis worldwide. It has an incidence which peaks among young adults, and 30 to 40% of patients’ progress to end stage kidney disease within twenty years of diagnosis. Ten-year kidney survival rates have been reported to be...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Selvaskandan, Haresh, Shi, Sufang, Twaij, Sara, Cheung, Chee Kay, Barratt, Jonathan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7572847/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33123151
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.572754
_version_ 1783597360936386560
author Selvaskandan, Haresh
Shi, Sufang
Twaij, Sara
Cheung, Chee Kay
Barratt, Jonathan
author_facet Selvaskandan, Haresh
Shi, Sufang
Twaij, Sara
Cheung, Chee Kay
Barratt, Jonathan
author_sort Selvaskandan, Haresh
collection PubMed
description IgA nephropathy (IgAN) is the commonest biopsy-reported primary glomerulonephritis worldwide. It has an incidence which peaks among young adults, and 30 to 40% of patients’ progress to end stage kidney disease within twenty years of diagnosis. Ten-year kidney survival rates have been reported to be as low as 35% in some parts of the world. The successful management of IgAN is limited by an incomplete understanding of the pathophysiology of IgAN and a poor understanding of how pathophysiology may vary both from patient to patient and between patient groups, particularly across races. This is compounded by a lack of rigorously designed and delivered clinical trials in IgAN. This is slowly changing, with a number of Phase 2 and 3 clinical trials of novel therapies targeting a number of different putative pathogenic pathways in IgAN due to report in the next 5 years. From our current, albeit limited, understanding of the pathophysiology of IgAN it is unlikely a single therapy will be effective in all patients with IgAN. The successful management of IgAN in the future is, therefore, likely to be reliant on targeted therapies, carefully selected based on an individualized understanding of a patient’s risk of progression and underlying pathophysiology. The potential role of biomarkers to facilitate personalization of prognostication and treatment of IgAN is immense. Here we review the progress made over the past decade in identifying and validating new biomarkers, with a particular focus on those that reflect immunological responses in IgAN.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7572847
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75728472020-10-28 Monitoring Immune Responses in IgA Nephropathy: Biomarkers to Guide Management Selvaskandan, Haresh Shi, Sufang Twaij, Sara Cheung, Chee Kay Barratt, Jonathan Front Immunol Immunology IgA nephropathy (IgAN) is the commonest biopsy-reported primary glomerulonephritis worldwide. It has an incidence which peaks among young adults, and 30 to 40% of patients’ progress to end stage kidney disease within twenty years of diagnosis. Ten-year kidney survival rates have been reported to be as low as 35% in some parts of the world. The successful management of IgAN is limited by an incomplete understanding of the pathophysiology of IgAN and a poor understanding of how pathophysiology may vary both from patient to patient and between patient groups, particularly across races. This is compounded by a lack of rigorously designed and delivered clinical trials in IgAN. This is slowly changing, with a number of Phase 2 and 3 clinical trials of novel therapies targeting a number of different putative pathogenic pathways in IgAN due to report in the next 5 years. From our current, albeit limited, understanding of the pathophysiology of IgAN it is unlikely a single therapy will be effective in all patients with IgAN. The successful management of IgAN in the future is, therefore, likely to be reliant on targeted therapies, carefully selected based on an individualized understanding of a patient’s risk of progression and underlying pathophysiology. The potential role of biomarkers to facilitate personalization of prognostication and treatment of IgAN is immense. Here we review the progress made over the past decade in identifying and validating new biomarkers, with a particular focus on those that reflect immunological responses in IgAN. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7572847/ /pubmed/33123151 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.572754 Text en Copyright © 2020 Selvaskandan, Shi, Twaij, Cheung and Barratt http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Immunology
Selvaskandan, Haresh
Shi, Sufang
Twaij, Sara
Cheung, Chee Kay
Barratt, Jonathan
Monitoring Immune Responses in IgA Nephropathy: Biomarkers to Guide Management
title Monitoring Immune Responses in IgA Nephropathy: Biomarkers to Guide Management
title_full Monitoring Immune Responses in IgA Nephropathy: Biomarkers to Guide Management
title_fullStr Monitoring Immune Responses in IgA Nephropathy: Biomarkers to Guide Management
title_full_unstemmed Monitoring Immune Responses in IgA Nephropathy: Biomarkers to Guide Management
title_short Monitoring Immune Responses in IgA Nephropathy: Biomarkers to Guide Management
title_sort monitoring immune responses in iga nephropathy: biomarkers to guide management
topic Immunology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7572847/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33123151
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.572754
work_keys_str_mv AT selvaskandanharesh monitoringimmuneresponsesiniganephropathybiomarkerstoguidemanagement
AT shisufang monitoringimmuneresponsesiniganephropathybiomarkerstoguidemanagement
AT twaijsara monitoringimmuneresponsesiniganephropathybiomarkerstoguidemanagement
AT cheungcheekay monitoringimmuneresponsesiniganephropathybiomarkerstoguidemanagement
AT barrattjonathan monitoringimmuneresponsesiniganephropathybiomarkerstoguidemanagement