Cargando…

Methacholine-Induced Cough in the Absence of Asthma: Insights From Impulse Oscillometry

INTRODUCTION: The pathophysiologic differences between methacholine-induced cough but normal airway sensitivity (COUGH) and healthy individuals (CONTROL) are incompletely understood and may be due to differences in the bronchodilating effect of deep inspirations (DIs). The purpose of this study is t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sood, Nilita, Wasilewski, Nastasia V., Day, Andrew G., Wall, Taylar, Fisher, Thomas, Fisher, John T., Lougheed, M. Diane
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7573225/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33123021
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.554679
_version_ 1783597399750475776
author Sood, Nilita
Wasilewski, Nastasia V.
Day, Andrew G.
Wall, Taylar
Fisher, Thomas
Fisher, John T.
Lougheed, M. Diane
author_facet Sood, Nilita
Wasilewski, Nastasia V.
Day, Andrew G.
Wall, Taylar
Fisher, Thomas
Fisher, John T.
Lougheed, M. Diane
author_sort Sood, Nilita
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The pathophysiologic differences between methacholine-induced cough but normal airway sensitivity (COUGH) and healthy individuals (CONTROL) are incompletely understood and may be due to differences in the bronchodilating effect of deep inspirations (DIs). The purpose of this study is to compare the bronchodilating effect of DIs in individuals with classic asthma (CA), cough variant asthma (CVA), and COUGH with CONTROL and to assess impulse oscillometry (IOS) measures as predictors of the bronchodilating effect of DIs. METHODS: A total of 43 adults [18 female; 44.8 ± 12.3 years (mean ± SD); n = 11 CA, n = 10 CVA, n = 7 COUGH, n = 15 CONTROL] underwent modified high-dose methacholine challenge, with IOS and partial/maximal expiratory flow volume (PEFV/MEFV) maneuvers (used to calculate DI Index) to a maximum change (Δ) in FEV(1) of 50% from baseline (MAX). Cough count and dyspnea were measured at each dose. The relation between IOS parameters and DI Index was assessed at baseline and MAX using multivariable linear regression analysis. RESULTS: Cough frequency, dyspnea intensity, and baseline peripheral resistance (R5–R20) were significantly greater in COUGH compared with CONTROL (p = 0.006, p = 0.029, and p = 0.035, respectively). At MAX, the DI Index was significantly lower in COUGH (0.01 ± 0.36) compared with CA (0.67 ± 0.97, p = 0.008), CVA (0.51 ± 0.73, p = 0.012), and CONTROL (0.68 ± 0.45, p = 0.005). Fres and R5–R20 were independent IOS predictors of the DI Index. CONCLUSION: The bronchodilating effect is impaired in COUGH and preserved in mild CA, CVA, and CONTROL. Increased peripheral airway resistance and decreased resonant frequency are associated with a decreased DI Index. COUGH is a clinical phenotype distinct from healthy normals and asthma.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7573225
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75732252020-10-28 Methacholine-Induced Cough in the Absence of Asthma: Insights From Impulse Oscillometry Sood, Nilita Wasilewski, Nastasia V. Day, Andrew G. Wall, Taylar Fisher, Thomas Fisher, John T. Lougheed, M. Diane Front Physiol Physiology INTRODUCTION: The pathophysiologic differences between methacholine-induced cough but normal airway sensitivity (COUGH) and healthy individuals (CONTROL) are incompletely understood and may be due to differences in the bronchodilating effect of deep inspirations (DIs). The purpose of this study is to compare the bronchodilating effect of DIs in individuals with classic asthma (CA), cough variant asthma (CVA), and COUGH with CONTROL and to assess impulse oscillometry (IOS) measures as predictors of the bronchodilating effect of DIs. METHODS: A total of 43 adults [18 female; 44.8 ± 12.3 years (mean ± SD); n = 11 CA, n = 10 CVA, n = 7 COUGH, n = 15 CONTROL] underwent modified high-dose methacholine challenge, with IOS and partial/maximal expiratory flow volume (PEFV/MEFV) maneuvers (used to calculate DI Index) to a maximum change (Δ) in FEV(1) of 50% from baseline (MAX). Cough count and dyspnea were measured at each dose. The relation between IOS parameters and DI Index was assessed at baseline and MAX using multivariable linear regression analysis. RESULTS: Cough frequency, dyspnea intensity, and baseline peripheral resistance (R5–R20) were significantly greater in COUGH compared with CONTROL (p = 0.006, p = 0.029, and p = 0.035, respectively). At MAX, the DI Index was significantly lower in COUGH (0.01 ± 0.36) compared with CA (0.67 ± 0.97, p = 0.008), CVA (0.51 ± 0.73, p = 0.012), and CONTROL (0.68 ± 0.45, p = 0.005). Fres and R5–R20 were independent IOS predictors of the DI Index. CONCLUSION: The bronchodilating effect is impaired in COUGH and preserved in mild CA, CVA, and CONTROL. Increased peripheral airway resistance and decreased resonant frequency are associated with a decreased DI Index. COUGH is a clinical phenotype distinct from healthy normals and asthma. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7573225/ /pubmed/33123021 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.554679 Text en Copyright © 2020 Sood, Wasilewski, Day, Wall, Fisher, Fisher and Lougheed. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Physiology
Sood, Nilita
Wasilewski, Nastasia V.
Day, Andrew G.
Wall, Taylar
Fisher, Thomas
Fisher, John T.
Lougheed, M. Diane
Methacholine-Induced Cough in the Absence of Asthma: Insights From Impulse Oscillometry
title Methacholine-Induced Cough in the Absence of Asthma: Insights From Impulse Oscillometry
title_full Methacholine-Induced Cough in the Absence of Asthma: Insights From Impulse Oscillometry
title_fullStr Methacholine-Induced Cough in the Absence of Asthma: Insights From Impulse Oscillometry
title_full_unstemmed Methacholine-Induced Cough in the Absence of Asthma: Insights From Impulse Oscillometry
title_short Methacholine-Induced Cough in the Absence of Asthma: Insights From Impulse Oscillometry
title_sort methacholine-induced cough in the absence of asthma: insights from impulse oscillometry
topic Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7573225/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33123021
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.554679
work_keys_str_mv AT soodnilita methacholineinducedcoughintheabsenceofasthmainsightsfromimpulseoscillometry
AT wasilewskinastasiav methacholineinducedcoughintheabsenceofasthmainsightsfromimpulseoscillometry
AT dayandrewg methacholineinducedcoughintheabsenceofasthmainsightsfromimpulseoscillometry
AT walltaylar methacholineinducedcoughintheabsenceofasthmainsightsfromimpulseoscillometry
AT fisherthomas methacholineinducedcoughintheabsenceofasthmainsightsfromimpulseoscillometry
AT fisherjohnt methacholineinducedcoughintheabsenceofasthmainsightsfromimpulseoscillometry
AT lougheedmdiane methacholineinducedcoughintheabsenceofasthmainsightsfromimpulseoscillometry