Cargando…

Modulated Response of Aspergillus fumigatus and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia to Antimicrobial Agents in Polymicrobial Biofilm

Introduction: The complexity of biofilms constitutes a therapeutic challenge and the antimicrobial susceptibility of fungal-bacterial biofilms remains poorly studied. The filamentous fungus Aspergillus fumigatus (Af) and the Gram-negative bacillus Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (Sm) can form biofilms...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Roisin, Lolita, Melloul, Elise, Woerther, Paul-Louis, Royer, Guilhem, Decousser, Jean-Winoc, Guillot, Jacques, Dannaoui, Eric, Botterel, Françoise
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7573239/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33123497
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2020.574028
_version_ 1783597403146813440
author Roisin, Lolita
Melloul, Elise
Woerther, Paul-Louis
Royer, Guilhem
Decousser, Jean-Winoc
Guillot, Jacques
Dannaoui, Eric
Botterel, Françoise
author_facet Roisin, Lolita
Melloul, Elise
Woerther, Paul-Louis
Royer, Guilhem
Decousser, Jean-Winoc
Guillot, Jacques
Dannaoui, Eric
Botterel, Françoise
author_sort Roisin, Lolita
collection PubMed
description Introduction: The complexity of biofilms constitutes a therapeutic challenge and the antimicrobial susceptibility of fungal-bacterial biofilms remains poorly studied. The filamentous fungus Aspergillus fumigatus (Af) and the Gram-negative bacillus Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (Sm) can form biofilms and can be co-isolated from the airways of cystic fibrosis (CF) patients. We previously developed an in vitro biofilm model which highlighted the antibiosis effect of Sm on Af, which was dependent on the bacterial fitness. The aim of the present study was to investigate the in vitro susceptibility of Af and Sm in mono- or polymicrobial biofilms to five antimicrobial agents alone and in two-drug combinations. Methods: Af and Sm clinical reference strains and two strains from CF sputa were tested through a planktonic and biofilm approaches. Af, Sm, or Af-Sm susceptibilities to amphotericin B (AMB), itraconazole (ITC), voriconazole (VRC), levofloxacin (LVX), and rifampicin (RFN) were evaluated by conventional planktonic techniques, crystal violet, XTT, qPCR, and viable plate count. Results: Af planktonic cells and biofilms in formation were more susceptible to AMB, ITC, and VRC than Af mature biofilms. Af mature biofilms were susceptible to AMB, but not to ITC and VRC. Based on viable plate count, a lower concentration of LVX and RFN was required to reduce Sm cell numbers on biofilms in formation compared with mature biofilms. The antibiosis effect of Sm on Af growth was more pronounced for the association of CF strains that exhibited a higher fitness than the reference strains. In Af-Sm biofilms, the fungal susceptibility to AMB was increased compared with Af biofilms. In contrast, the bacterial susceptibility to LVX decreased in Af-Sm biofilms and was fungal biomass-dependent. The combination of AMB (64 μg/mL) with LVX or RFN (4 μg/mL) was efficient to impair Af and Sm growth in the polymicrobial biofilm. Conclusion: Sm increased the Af susceptibility to AMB, whereas Af protected Sm from LVX. Interactions between Af and Sm within biofilms modulate susceptibility to antimicrobial agents, opening the way to new antimicrobial strategies in CF patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7573239
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75732392020-10-28 Modulated Response of Aspergillus fumigatus and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia to Antimicrobial Agents in Polymicrobial Biofilm Roisin, Lolita Melloul, Elise Woerther, Paul-Louis Royer, Guilhem Decousser, Jean-Winoc Guillot, Jacques Dannaoui, Eric Botterel, Françoise Front Cell Infect Microbiol Cellular and Infection Microbiology Introduction: The complexity of biofilms constitutes a therapeutic challenge and the antimicrobial susceptibility of fungal-bacterial biofilms remains poorly studied. The filamentous fungus Aspergillus fumigatus (Af) and the Gram-negative bacillus Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (Sm) can form biofilms and can be co-isolated from the airways of cystic fibrosis (CF) patients. We previously developed an in vitro biofilm model which highlighted the antibiosis effect of Sm on Af, which was dependent on the bacterial fitness. The aim of the present study was to investigate the in vitro susceptibility of Af and Sm in mono- or polymicrobial biofilms to five antimicrobial agents alone and in two-drug combinations. Methods: Af and Sm clinical reference strains and two strains from CF sputa were tested through a planktonic and biofilm approaches. Af, Sm, or Af-Sm susceptibilities to amphotericin B (AMB), itraconazole (ITC), voriconazole (VRC), levofloxacin (LVX), and rifampicin (RFN) were evaluated by conventional planktonic techniques, crystal violet, XTT, qPCR, and viable plate count. Results: Af planktonic cells and biofilms in formation were more susceptible to AMB, ITC, and VRC than Af mature biofilms. Af mature biofilms were susceptible to AMB, but not to ITC and VRC. Based on viable plate count, a lower concentration of LVX and RFN was required to reduce Sm cell numbers on biofilms in formation compared with mature biofilms. The antibiosis effect of Sm on Af growth was more pronounced for the association of CF strains that exhibited a higher fitness than the reference strains. In Af-Sm biofilms, the fungal susceptibility to AMB was increased compared with Af biofilms. In contrast, the bacterial susceptibility to LVX decreased in Af-Sm biofilms and was fungal biomass-dependent. The combination of AMB (64 μg/mL) with LVX or RFN (4 μg/mL) was efficient to impair Af and Sm growth in the polymicrobial biofilm. Conclusion: Sm increased the Af susceptibility to AMB, whereas Af protected Sm from LVX. Interactions between Af and Sm within biofilms modulate susceptibility to antimicrobial agents, opening the way to new antimicrobial strategies in CF patients. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7573239/ /pubmed/33123497 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2020.574028 Text en Copyright © 2020 Roisin, Melloul, Woerther, Royer, Decousser, Guillot, Dannaoui and Botterel. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Cellular and Infection Microbiology
Roisin, Lolita
Melloul, Elise
Woerther, Paul-Louis
Royer, Guilhem
Decousser, Jean-Winoc
Guillot, Jacques
Dannaoui, Eric
Botterel, Françoise
Modulated Response of Aspergillus fumigatus and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia to Antimicrobial Agents in Polymicrobial Biofilm
title Modulated Response of Aspergillus fumigatus and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia to Antimicrobial Agents in Polymicrobial Biofilm
title_full Modulated Response of Aspergillus fumigatus and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia to Antimicrobial Agents in Polymicrobial Biofilm
title_fullStr Modulated Response of Aspergillus fumigatus and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia to Antimicrobial Agents in Polymicrobial Biofilm
title_full_unstemmed Modulated Response of Aspergillus fumigatus and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia to Antimicrobial Agents in Polymicrobial Biofilm
title_short Modulated Response of Aspergillus fumigatus and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia to Antimicrobial Agents in Polymicrobial Biofilm
title_sort modulated response of aspergillus fumigatus and stenotrophomonas maltophilia to antimicrobial agents in polymicrobial biofilm
topic Cellular and Infection Microbiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7573239/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33123497
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2020.574028
work_keys_str_mv AT roisinlolita modulatedresponseofaspergillusfumigatusandstenotrophomonasmaltophiliatoantimicrobialagentsinpolymicrobialbiofilm
AT melloulelise modulatedresponseofaspergillusfumigatusandstenotrophomonasmaltophiliatoantimicrobialagentsinpolymicrobialbiofilm
AT woertherpaullouis modulatedresponseofaspergillusfumigatusandstenotrophomonasmaltophiliatoantimicrobialagentsinpolymicrobialbiofilm
AT royerguilhem modulatedresponseofaspergillusfumigatusandstenotrophomonasmaltophiliatoantimicrobialagentsinpolymicrobialbiofilm
AT decousserjeanwinoc modulatedresponseofaspergillusfumigatusandstenotrophomonasmaltophiliatoantimicrobialagentsinpolymicrobialbiofilm
AT guillotjacques modulatedresponseofaspergillusfumigatusandstenotrophomonasmaltophiliatoantimicrobialagentsinpolymicrobialbiofilm
AT dannaouieric modulatedresponseofaspergillusfumigatusandstenotrophomonasmaltophiliatoantimicrobialagentsinpolymicrobialbiofilm
AT botterelfrancoise modulatedresponseofaspergillusfumigatusandstenotrophomonasmaltophiliatoantimicrobialagentsinpolymicrobialbiofilm