Cargando…
Contraction Phase and Force Differentially Change Motor Evoked Potential Recruitment Slope and Interhemispheric Inhibition in Young Versus Old
Interhemispheric interactions are important for arm coordination and hemispheric specialization. Unilateral voluntary static contraction is known to increase bilateral corticospinal motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude. It is unknown how increasing and decreasing contraction affect the opposite li...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7573560/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33132888 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.581008 |
_version_ | 1783597467288207360 |
---|---|
author | Ermer, Elsa Harcum, Stacey Lush, Jaime Magder, Laurence S. Whitall, Jill Wittenberg, George F. Dimyan, Michael A. |
author_facet | Ermer, Elsa Harcum, Stacey Lush, Jaime Magder, Laurence S. Whitall, Jill Wittenberg, George F. Dimyan, Michael A. |
author_sort | Ermer, Elsa |
collection | PubMed |
description | Interhemispheric interactions are important for arm coordination and hemispheric specialization. Unilateral voluntary static contraction is known to increase bilateral corticospinal motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude. It is unknown how increasing and decreasing contraction affect the opposite limb. Since dynamic muscle contraction is more ecologically relevant to daily activities, we studied MEP recruitment using a novel method and short interval interhemispheric inhibition (IHI) from active to resting hemisphere at 4 phases of contralateral ECR contraction: Rest, Ramp Up [increasing at 25% of maximum voluntary contraction (MVC)], Execution (tonic at 50% MVC), and Ramp Down (relaxation at 25% MVC) in 42 healthy adults. We analyzed the linear portion of resting extensor carpi radialis (ECR) MEP recruitment by stimulating at multiple intensities and comparing slopes, expressed as mV per TMS stimulation level, via linear mixed modeling. In younger participants (age ≤ 30), resting ECR MEP recruitment slopes were significantly and equally larger both at Ramp Up (slope increase = 0.047, p < 0.001) and Ramp Down (slope increase = 0.031, p < 0.001) compared to rest, despite opposite directions of force change. In contrast, Active ECR MEP recruitment slopes were larger in Ramp Down than all other phases (Rest:0.184, p < 0.001; Ramp Up:0.128, p = 0.001; Execution: p = 0.003). Older (age ≥ 60) participants’ resting MEP recruitment slope was higher than younger participants across all phases. IHI did not reduce MEP recruitment slope equally in old compared to young. In conclusion, our data indicate that MEP recruitment slope in the resting limb is affected by the homologous active limb contraction force, irrespective of the direction of force change. The active arm MEP recruitment slope, in contrast, remains relatively unaffected. Older participants had steeper MEP recruitment slopes and less interhemispheric inhibition compared to younger participants. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7573560 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75735602020-10-30 Contraction Phase and Force Differentially Change Motor Evoked Potential Recruitment Slope and Interhemispheric Inhibition in Young Versus Old Ermer, Elsa Harcum, Stacey Lush, Jaime Magder, Laurence S. Whitall, Jill Wittenberg, George F. Dimyan, Michael A. Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Interhemispheric interactions are important for arm coordination and hemispheric specialization. Unilateral voluntary static contraction is known to increase bilateral corticospinal motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude. It is unknown how increasing and decreasing contraction affect the opposite limb. Since dynamic muscle contraction is more ecologically relevant to daily activities, we studied MEP recruitment using a novel method and short interval interhemispheric inhibition (IHI) from active to resting hemisphere at 4 phases of contralateral ECR contraction: Rest, Ramp Up [increasing at 25% of maximum voluntary contraction (MVC)], Execution (tonic at 50% MVC), and Ramp Down (relaxation at 25% MVC) in 42 healthy adults. We analyzed the linear portion of resting extensor carpi radialis (ECR) MEP recruitment by stimulating at multiple intensities and comparing slopes, expressed as mV per TMS stimulation level, via linear mixed modeling. In younger participants (age ≤ 30), resting ECR MEP recruitment slopes were significantly and equally larger both at Ramp Up (slope increase = 0.047, p < 0.001) and Ramp Down (slope increase = 0.031, p < 0.001) compared to rest, despite opposite directions of force change. In contrast, Active ECR MEP recruitment slopes were larger in Ramp Down than all other phases (Rest:0.184, p < 0.001; Ramp Up:0.128, p = 0.001; Execution: p = 0.003). Older (age ≥ 60) participants’ resting MEP recruitment slope was higher than younger participants across all phases. IHI did not reduce MEP recruitment slope equally in old compared to young. In conclusion, our data indicate that MEP recruitment slope in the resting limb is affected by the homologous active limb contraction force, irrespective of the direction of force change. The active arm MEP recruitment slope, in contrast, remains relatively unaffected. Older participants had steeper MEP recruitment slopes and less interhemispheric inhibition compared to younger participants. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7573560/ /pubmed/33132888 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.581008 Text en Copyright © 2020 Ermer, Harcum, Lush, Magder, Whitall, Wittenberg and Dimyan. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Ermer, Elsa Harcum, Stacey Lush, Jaime Magder, Laurence S. Whitall, Jill Wittenberg, George F. Dimyan, Michael A. Contraction Phase and Force Differentially Change Motor Evoked Potential Recruitment Slope and Interhemispheric Inhibition in Young Versus Old |
title | Contraction Phase and Force Differentially Change Motor Evoked Potential Recruitment Slope and Interhemispheric Inhibition in Young Versus Old |
title_full | Contraction Phase and Force Differentially Change Motor Evoked Potential Recruitment Slope and Interhemispheric Inhibition in Young Versus Old |
title_fullStr | Contraction Phase and Force Differentially Change Motor Evoked Potential Recruitment Slope and Interhemispheric Inhibition in Young Versus Old |
title_full_unstemmed | Contraction Phase and Force Differentially Change Motor Evoked Potential Recruitment Slope and Interhemispheric Inhibition in Young Versus Old |
title_short | Contraction Phase and Force Differentially Change Motor Evoked Potential Recruitment Slope and Interhemispheric Inhibition in Young Versus Old |
title_sort | contraction phase and force differentially change motor evoked potential recruitment slope and interhemispheric inhibition in young versus old |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7573560/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33132888 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.581008 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ermerelsa contractionphaseandforcedifferentiallychangemotorevokedpotentialrecruitmentslopeandinterhemisphericinhibitioninyoungversusold AT harcumstacey contractionphaseandforcedifferentiallychangemotorevokedpotentialrecruitmentslopeandinterhemisphericinhibitioninyoungversusold AT lushjaime contractionphaseandforcedifferentiallychangemotorevokedpotentialrecruitmentslopeandinterhemisphericinhibitioninyoungversusold AT magderlaurences contractionphaseandforcedifferentiallychangemotorevokedpotentialrecruitmentslopeandinterhemisphericinhibitioninyoungversusold AT whitalljill contractionphaseandforcedifferentiallychangemotorevokedpotentialrecruitmentslopeandinterhemisphericinhibitioninyoungversusold AT wittenberggeorgef contractionphaseandforcedifferentiallychangemotorevokedpotentialrecruitmentslopeandinterhemisphericinhibitioninyoungversusold AT dimyanmichaela contractionphaseandforcedifferentiallychangemotorevokedpotentialrecruitmentslopeandinterhemisphericinhibitioninyoungversusold |