Cargando…

Evaluation of four final irrigation protocols for cleaning root canal walls

The aim of this study was to compare the efficiency of four final irrigation protocols in smear layer removal and bacterial inhibition in root canal systems. Thirty roots inoculated with Enterococcus faecalis were prepared with ProTaper Universal files. The teeth were disinfected by conventional nee...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Qiang, Zhang, Qian, Zou, Xiaoying, Yue, Lin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7573610/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33077718
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41368-020-00091-4
_version_ 1783597478855049216
author Li, Qiang
Zhang, Qian
Zou, Xiaoying
Yue, Lin
author_facet Li, Qiang
Zhang, Qian
Zou, Xiaoying
Yue, Lin
author_sort Li, Qiang
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study was to compare the efficiency of four final irrigation protocols in smear layer removal and bacterial inhibition in root canal systems. Thirty roots inoculated with Enterococcus faecalis were prepared with ProTaper Universal files. The teeth were disinfected by conventional needle irrigation, sonic agitation using the EndoActivator device, passive ultrasonic irrigation, or an M3 Max file. Teeth with no root canal preparation served as blank controls for the establishment of the infection baseline. Teeth with preparation but no final irrigation served as a post-instrumentation baseline. After the final irrigation, the teeth were sectioned in half. One half of each tooth was examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to assess smear layer removal using a five-point scale. The other half was examined by confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) using the LIVE/DEAD BackLight bacterial viability kit to evaluate the depth of bacterial survival in dentinal tubules. SEM analysis revealed no significant difference in smear layer removal throughout the whole canal among the EA, PUI, and M3 Max groups (P > 0.05). CLSM revealed that PUI achieved the greatest bacterial inhibition depth in the coronal ((174.27 ± 31.63) μm), middle ((160.94 ± 37.77) μm), and apical ((119.53 ± 28.49) μm) thirds of the canal (all P < 0.05 vs. other groups). According to this comprehensive SEM and CLSM evaluation, PUI appears to have the best infection control ability in root canal systems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7573610
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75736102020-10-20 Evaluation of four final irrigation protocols for cleaning root canal walls Li, Qiang Zhang, Qian Zou, Xiaoying Yue, Lin Int J Oral Sci Article The aim of this study was to compare the efficiency of four final irrigation protocols in smear layer removal and bacterial inhibition in root canal systems. Thirty roots inoculated with Enterococcus faecalis were prepared with ProTaper Universal files. The teeth were disinfected by conventional needle irrigation, sonic agitation using the EndoActivator device, passive ultrasonic irrigation, or an M3 Max file. Teeth with no root canal preparation served as blank controls for the establishment of the infection baseline. Teeth with preparation but no final irrigation served as a post-instrumentation baseline. After the final irrigation, the teeth were sectioned in half. One half of each tooth was examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to assess smear layer removal using a five-point scale. The other half was examined by confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) using the LIVE/DEAD BackLight bacterial viability kit to evaluate the depth of bacterial survival in dentinal tubules. SEM analysis revealed no significant difference in smear layer removal throughout the whole canal among the EA, PUI, and M3 Max groups (P > 0.05). CLSM revealed that PUI achieved the greatest bacterial inhibition depth in the coronal ((174.27 ± 31.63) μm), middle ((160.94 ± 37.77) μm), and apical ((119.53 ± 28.49) μm) thirds of the canal (all P < 0.05 vs. other groups). According to this comprehensive SEM and CLSM evaluation, PUI appears to have the best infection control ability in root canal systems. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7573610/ /pubmed/33077718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41368-020-00091-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Li, Qiang
Zhang, Qian
Zou, Xiaoying
Yue, Lin
Evaluation of four final irrigation protocols for cleaning root canal walls
title Evaluation of four final irrigation protocols for cleaning root canal walls
title_full Evaluation of four final irrigation protocols for cleaning root canal walls
title_fullStr Evaluation of four final irrigation protocols for cleaning root canal walls
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of four final irrigation protocols for cleaning root canal walls
title_short Evaluation of four final irrigation protocols for cleaning root canal walls
title_sort evaluation of four final irrigation protocols for cleaning root canal walls
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7573610/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33077718
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41368-020-00091-4
work_keys_str_mv AT liqiang evaluationoffourfinalirrigationprotocolsforcleaningrootcanalwalls
AT zhangqian evaluationoffourfinalirrigationprotocolsforcleaningrootcanalwalls
AT zouxiaoying evaluationoffourfinalirrigationprotocolsforcleaningrootcanalwalls
AT yuelin evaluationoffourfinalirrigationprotocolsforcleaningrootcanalwalls