Cargando…

Implementation of a Ureteric Colic Telemedicine Service: A Mixed Methods Quality Improvement Study

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of a telemedicine service for ureteric colic patients in reducing the number of unnecessary face-to-face consultations and shortening waiting time for appointments. METHODS: A telemedicine workflow was implemented as a quality improvement study using the Plan-D...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ong, Chloe Shu Hui, Lu, Jirong, Tan, Yi Quan, Tan, Lincoln Guan Lim, Tiong, Ho Yee
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7573635/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33091386
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2020.10.010
_version_ 1783597484874924032
author Ong, Chloe Shu Hui
Lu, Jirong
Tan, Yi Quan
Tan, Lincoln Guan Lim
Tiong, Ho Yee
author_facet Ong, Chloe Shu Hui
Lu, Jirong
Tan, Yi Quan
Tan, Lincoln Guan Lim
Tiong, Ho Yee
author_sort Ong, Chloe Shu Hui
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of a telemedicine service for ureteric colic patients in reducing the number of unnecessary face-to-face consultations and shortening waiting time for appointments. METHODS: A telemedicine workflow was implemented as a quality improvement study using the Plan-Do-Study-Act method. All patients presenting with ureteric colic without high-risk features of fever, severe pain, and hydronephrosis, were recruited, and face-to-face appointments to review scan results were replaced with phone consultations. Data were prospectively collected over 3 years (January 2017 to December 2019). Patient outcomes including the reduction in face-to-face review visits, time to review, reattendance and intervention rates, were tracked in an interrupted time-series analysis, and qualitative feedback was obtained from patients and clinicians. RESULTS: Around 53.2% of patients presenting with ureteric colic were recruited into the telemedicine workflow. A total of 465 patients (46.2%) had normal scan results and 250 patients (24.9%) did not attend their scan appointments, hence reducing the number of face-to-face consultations by 71.1%. A total of 230 patients (22.9%) required subsequent follow-up with urology, while 61 patients (6.1%) were referred to other specialties. Mean (SD) time to review was 30.0 (6.2) days, 6-month intervention rate was 3.4% (n = 34) and unplanned reattendance rate was 3.2% (n = 32). Around 93.1% of patients reported satisfaction with the service. CONCLUSION: The ureteric colic telemedicine service successfully and sustainably reduced the number of face-to-face consultations and time to review without compromising on patient safety. The availability of this telemedicine service has become even more important in helping us provide care to patients with ureteric colic in the current COVID-19 pandemic.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7573635
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75736352020-10-20 Implementation of a Ureteric Colic Telemedicine Service: A Mixed Methods Quality Improvement Study Ong, Chloe Shu Hui Lu, Jirong Tan, Yi Quan Tan, Lincoln Guan Lim Tiong, Ho Yee Urology Ambulatory, Office-based, and Geriatric Urology OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of a telemedicine service for ureteric colic patients in reducing the number of unnecessary face-to-face consultations and shortening waiting time for appointments. METHODS: A telemedicine workflow was implemented as a quality improvement study using the Plan-Do-Study-Act method. All patients presenting with ureteric colic without high-risk features of fever, severe pain, and hydronephrosis, were recruited, and face-to-face appointments to review scan results were replaced with phone consultations. Data were prospectively collected over 3 years (January 2017 to December 2019). Patient outcomes including the reduction in face-to-face review visits, time to review, reattendance and intervention rates, were tracked in an interrupted time-series analysis, and qualitative feedback was obtained from patients and clinicians. RESULTS: Around 53.2% of patients presenting with ureteric colic were recruited into the telemedicine workflow. A total of 465 patients (46.2%) had normal scan results and 250 patients (24.9%) did not attend their scan appointments, hence reducing the number of face-to-face consultations by 71.1%. A total of 230 patients (22.9%) required subsequent follow-up with urology, while 61 patients (6.1%) were referred to other specialties. Mean (SD) time to review was 30.0 (6.2) days, 6-month intervention rate was 3.4% (n = 34) and unplanned reattendance rate was 3.2% (n = 32). Around 93.1% of patients reported satisfaction with the service. CONCLUSION: The ureteric colic telemedicine service successfully and sustainably reduced the number of face-to-face consultations and time to review without compromising on patient safety. The availability of this telemedicine service has become even more important in helping us provide care to patients with ureteric colic in the current COVID-19 pandemic. Elsevier Inc. 2021-01 2020-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7573635/ /pubmed/33091386 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2020.10.010 Text en © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Ambulatory, Office-based, and Geriatric Urology
Ong, Chloe Shu Hui
Lu, Jirong
Tan, Yi Quan
Tan, Lincoln Guan Lim
Tiong, Ho Yee
Implementation of a Ureteric Colic Telemedicine Service: A Mixed Methods Quality Improvement Study
title Implementation of a Ureteric Colic Telemedicine Service: A Mixed Methods Quality Improvement Study
title_full Implementation of a Ureteric Colic Telemedicine Service: A Mixed Methods Quality Improvement Study
title_fullStr Implementation of a Ureteric Colic Telemedicine Service: A Mixed Methods Quality Improvement Study
title_full_unstemmed Implementation of a Ureteric Colic Telemedicine Service: A Mixed Methods Quality Improvement Study
title_short Implementation of a Ureteric Colic Telemedicine Service: A Mixed Methods Quality Improvement Study
title_sort implementation of a ureteric colic telemedicine service: a mixed methods quality improvement study
topic Ambulatory, Office-based, and Geriatric Urology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7573635/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33091386
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2020.10.010
work_keys_str_mv AT ongchloeshuhui implementationofauretericcolictelemedicineserviceamixedmethodsqualityimprovementstudy
AT lujirong implementationofauretericcolictelemedicineserviceamixedmethodsqualityimprovementstudy
AT tanyiquan implementationofauretericcolictelemedicineserviceamixedmethodsqualityimprovementstudy
AT tanlincolnguanlim implementationofauretericcolictelemedicineserviceamixedmethodsqualityimprovementstudy
AT tionghoyee implementationofauretericcolictelemedicineserviceamixedmethodsqualityimprovementstudy