Cargando…
Implementation of a Ureteric Colic Telemedicine Service: A Mixed Methods Quality Improvement Study
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of a telemedicine service for ureteric colic patients in reducing the number of unnecessary face-to-face consultations and shortening waiting time for appointments. METHODS: A telemedicine workflow was implemented as a quality improvement study using the Plan-D...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7573635/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33091386 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2020.10.010 |
_version_ | 1783597484874924032 |
---|---|
author | Ong, Chloe Shu Hui Lu, Jirong Tan, Yi Quan Tan, Lincoln Guan Lim Tiong, Ho Yee |
author_facet | Ong, Chloe Shu Hui Lu, Jirong Tan, Yi Quan Tan, Lincoln Guan Lim Tiong, Ho Yee |
author_sort | Ong, Chloe Shu Hui |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of a telemedicine service for ureteric colic patients in reducing the number of unnecessary face-to-face consultations and shortening waiting time for appointments. METHODS: A telemedicine workflow was implemented as a quality improvement study using the Plan-Do-Study-Act method. All patients presenting with ureteric colic without high-risk features of fever, severe pain, and hydronephrosis, were recruited, and face-to-face appointments to review scan results were replaced with phone consultations. Data were prospectively collected over 3 years (January 2017 to December 2019). Patient outcomes including the reduction in face-to-face review visits, time to review, reattendance and intervention rates, were tracked in an interrupted time-series analysis, and qualitative feedback was obtained from patients and clinicians. RESULTS: Around 53.2% of patients presenting with ureteric colic were recruited into the telemedicine workflow. A total of 465 patients (46.2%) had normal scan results and 250 patients (24.9%) did not attend their scan appointments, hence reducing the number of face-to-face consultations by 71.1%. A total of 230 patients (22.9%) required subsequent follow-up with urology, while 61 patients (6.1%) were referred to other specialties. Mean (SD) time to review was 30.0 (6.2) days, 6-month intervention rate was 3.4% (n = 34) and unplanned reattendance rate was 3.2% (n = 32). Around 93.1% of patients reported satisfaction with the service. CONCLUSION: The ureteric colic telemedicine service successfully and sustainably reduced the number of face-to-face consultations and time to review without compromising on patient safety. The availability of this telemedicine service has become even more important in helping us provide care to patients with ureteric colic in the current COVID-19 pandemic. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7573635 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75736352020-10-20 Implementation of a Ureteric Colic Telemedicine Service: A Mixed Methods Quality Improvement Study Ong, Chloe Shu Hui Lu, Jirong Tan, Yi Quan Tan, Lincoln Guan Lim Tiong, Ho Yee Urology Ambulatory, Office-based, and Geriatric Urology OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of a telemedicine service for ureteric colic patients in reducing the number of unnecessary face-to-face consultations and shortening waiting time for appointments. METHODS: A telemedicine workflow was implemented as a quality improvement study using the Plan-Do-Study-Act method. All patients presenting with ureteric colic without high-risk features of fever, severe pain, and hydronephrosis, were recruited, and face-to-face appointments to review scan results were replaced with phone consultations. Data were prospectively collected over 3 years (January 2017 to December 2019). Patient outcomes including the reduction in face-to-face review visits, time to review, reattendance and intervention rates, were tracked in an interrupted time-series analysis, and qualitative feedback was obtained from patients and clinicians. RESULTS: Around 53.2% of patients presenting with ureteric colic were recruited into the telemedicine workflow. A total of 465 patients (46.2%) had normal scan results and 250 patients (24.9%) did not attend their scan appointments, hence reducing the number of face-to-face consultations by 71.1%. A total of 230 patients (22.9%) required subsequent follow-up with urology, while 61 patients (6.1%) were referred to other specialties. Mean (SD) time to review was 30.0 (6.2) days, 6-month intervention rate was 3.4% (n = 34) and unplanned reattendance rate was 3.2% (n = 32). Around 93.1% of patients reported satisfaction with the service. CONCLUSION: The ureteric colic telemedicine service successfully and sustainably reduced the number of face-to-face consultations and time to review without compromising on patient safety. The availability of this telemedicine service has become even more important in helping us provide care to patients with ureteric colic in the current COVID-19 pandemic. Elsevier Inc. 2021-01 2020-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7573635/ /pubmed/33091386 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2020.10.010 Text en © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Ambulatory, Office-based, and Geriatric Urology Ong, Chloe Shu Hui Lu, Jirong Tan, Yi Quan Tan, Lincoln Guan Lim Tiong, Ho Yee Implementation of a Ureteric Colic Telemedicine Service: A Mixed Methods Quality Improvement Study |
title | Implementation of a Ureteric Colic Telemedicine Service: A Mixed Methods Quality Improvement Study |
title_full | Implementation of a Ureteric Colic Telemedicine Service: A Mixed Methods Quality Improvement Study |
title_fullStr | Implementation of a Ureteric Colic Telemedicine Service: A Mixed Methods Quality Improvement Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Implementation of a Ureteric Colic Telemedicine Service: A Mixed Methods Quality Improvement Study |
title_short | Implementation of a Ureteric Colic Telemedicine Service: A Mixed Methods Quality Improvement Study |
title_sort | implementation of a ureteric colic telemedicine service: a mixed methods quality improvement study |
topic | Ambulatory, Office-based, and Geriatric Urology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7573635/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33091386 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2020.10.010 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ongchloeshuhui implementationofauretericcolictelemedicineserviceamixedmethodsqualityimprovementstudy AT lujirong implementationofauretericcolictelemedicineserviceamixedmethodsqualityimprovementstudy AT tanyiquan implementationofauretericcolictelemedicineserviceamixedmethodsqualityimprovementstudy AT tanlincolnguanlim implementationofauretericcolictelemedicineserviceamixedmethodsqualityimprovementstudy AT tionghoyee implementationofauretericcolictelemedicineserviceamixedmethodsqualityimprovementstudy |