Cargando…
Design of a randomized controlled trial to evaluate effectiveness of methotrexate versus prednisone as first-line treatment for pulmonary sarcoidosis: the PREDMETH study
BACKGROUND: Treatment of pulmonary sarcoidosis is recommended in case of significant symptoms, impaired or deteriorating lung function. Evidence-based treatment recommendations are limited and largely based on expert opinion. Prednisone is currently the first-choice therapy and leads to short-term i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7574228/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33076885 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-020-01290-9 |
_version_ | 1783597598912806912 |
---|---|
author | Kahlmann, Vivienne Janssen Bonás, Montse Moor, Catharina C. van Moorsel, Coline H. M. Kool, Mirjam Kraaijvanger, Raisa Grutters, Jan C. Overgaauw, Mayka Veltkamp, Marcel Wijsenbeek, Marlies S. |
author_facet | Kahlmann, Vivienne Janssen Bonás, Montse Moor, Catharina C. van Moorsel, Coline H. M. Kool, Mirjam Kraaijvanger, Raisa Grutters, Jan C. Overgaauw, Mayka Veltkamp, Marcel Wijsenbeek, Marlies S. |
author_sort | Kahlmann, Vivienne |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Treatment of pulmonary sarcoidosis is recommended in case of significant symptoms, impaired or deteriorating lung function. Evidence-based treatment recommendations are limited and largely based on expert opinion. Prednisone is currently the first-choice therapy and leads to short-term improvement of lung function. Unfortunately, prednisone often has side-effects and may be associated with impaired quality of life. Methotrexate is presently considered second-line therapy, and appears to have fewer side-effects. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this trial is to investigate the effectiveness and tolerability of methotrexate as first-line therapy in patients with pulmonary sarcoidosis compared with prednisone. The primary endpoint of this study will be the change in hospital-measured Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) between baseline and 24 weeks. Secondary objectives are to gain more insights in response to therapy in individual patients by home spirometry and patient-reported outcomes. Blood biomarkers will be examined to find predictors of response to therapy, disease progression and chronicity, and to improve our understanding of the underlying disease mechanism. METHODS/DESIGN: In this prospective, randomized, non-blinded, multi-center, non-inferiority trial, we plan to randomize 138 treatment-naïve patients with pulmonary sarcoidosis who are about to start treatment. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either prednisone or methotrexate in a predefined schedule for 24 weeks, after which they will be followed up in regular care for up to 2 years. Regular hospital visits will include pulmonary function assessment, completion of patient-reported outcomes, and blood withdrawal. Additionally, patients will be asked to perform weekly home spirometry, and record symptoms and side-effects via a home monitoring application for 24 weeks. DISCUSSION: This study will be the first randomized controlled trial comparing first-line treatment of prednisone and methotrexate and provide valuable data on efficacy, safety, quality of life and biomarkers. If this study confirms the hypothesis that methotrexate is as effective as prednisone as first-line treatment for sarcoidosis but with fewer side-effects, this will lead to improvement in care and initiate a change in practice. Furthermore, insights into the immunological mechanisms underlying sarcoidosis pathology might reveal new therapeutic targets. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered on the 19th of March 2020 in the International Clinical Trial Registry, www.clinicaltrials.gov; ID NCT04314193. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7574228 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75742282020-10-20 Design of a randomized controlled trial to evaluate effectiveness of methotrexate versus prednisone as first-line treatment for pulmonary sarcoidosis: the PREDMETH study Kahlmann, Vivienne Janssen Bonás, Montse Moor, Catharina C. van Moorsel, Coline H. M. Kool, Mirjam Kraaijvanger, Raisa Grutters, Jan C. Overgaauw, Mayka Veltkamp, Marcel Wijsenbeek, Marlies S. BMC Pulm Med Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Treatment of pulmonary sarcoidosis is recommended in case of significant symptoms, impaired or deteriorating lung function. Evidence-based treatment recommendations are limited and largely based on expert opinion. Prednisone is currently the first-choice therapy and leads to short-term improvement of lung function. Unfortunately, prednisone often has side-effects and may be associated with impaired quality of life. Methotrexate is presently considered second-line therapy, and appears to have fewer side-effects. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this trial is to investigate the effectiveness and tolerability of methotrexate as first-line therapy in patients with pulmonary sarcoidosis compared with prednisone. The primary endpoint of this study will be the change in hospital-measured Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) between baseline and 24 weeks. Secondary objectives are to gain more insights in response to therapy in individual patients by home spirometry and patient-reported outcomes. Blood biomarkers will be examined to find predictors of response to therapy, disease progression and chronicity, and to improve our understanding of the underlying disease mechanism. METHODS/DESIGN: In this prospective, randomized, non-blinded, multi-center, non-inferiority trial, we plan to randomize 138 treatment-naïve patients with pulmonary sarcoidosis who are about to start treatment. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either prednisone or methotrexate in a predefined schedule for 24 weeks, after which they will be followed up in regular care for up to 2 years. Regular hospital visits will include pulmonary function assessment, completion of patient-reported outcomes, and blood withdrawal. Additionally, patients will be asked to perform weekly home spirometry, and record symptoms and side-effects via a home monitoring application for 24 weeks. DISCUSSION: This study will be the first randomized controlled trial comparing first-line treatment of prednisone and methotrexate and provide valuable data on efficacy, safety, quality of life and biomarkers. If this study confirms the hypothesis that methotrexate is as effective as prednisone as first-line treatment for sarcoidosis but with fewer side-effects, this will lead to improvement in care and initiate a change in practice. Furthermore, insights into the immunological mechanisms underlying sarcoidosis pathology might reveal new therapeutic targets. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered on the 19th of March 2020 in the International Clinical Trial Registry, www.clinicaltrials.gov; ID NCT04314193. BioMed Central 2020-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7574228/ /pubmed/33076885 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-020-01290-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Kahlmann, Vivienne Janssen Bonás, Montse Moor, Catharina C. van Moorsel, Coline H. M. Kool, Mirjam Kraaijvanger, Raisa Grutters, Jan C. Overgaauw, Mayka Veltkamp, Marcel Wijsenbeek, Marlies S. Design of a randomized controlled trial to evaluate effectiveness of methotrexate versus prednisone as first-line treatment for pulmonary sarcoidosis: the PREDMETH study |
title | Design of a randomized controlled trial to evaluate effectiveness of methotrexate versus prednisone as first-line treatment for pulmonary sarcoidosis: the PREDMETH study |
title_full | Design of a randomized controlled trial to evaluate effectiveness of methotrexate versus prednisone as first-line treatment for pulmonary sarcoidosis: the PREDMETH study |
title_fullStr | Design of a randomized controlled trial to evaluate effectiveness of methotrexate versus prednisone as first-line treatment for pulmonary sarcoidosis: the PREDMETH study |
title_full_unstemmed | Design of a randomized controlled trial to evaluate effectiveness of methotrexate versus prednisone as first-line treatment for pulmonary sarcoidosis: the PREDMETH study |
title_short | Design of a randomized controlled trial to evaluate effectiveness of methotrexate versus prednisone as first-line treatment for pulmonary sarcoidosis: the PREDMETH study |
title_sort | design of a randomized controlled trial to evaluate effectiveness of methotrexate versus prednisone as first-line treatment for pulmonary sarcoidosis: the predmeth study |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7574228/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33076885 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-020-01290-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kahlmannvivienne designofarandomizedcontrolledtrialtoevaluateeffectivenessofmethotrexateversusprednisoneasfirstlinetreatmentforpulmonarysarcoidosisthepredmethstudy AT janssenbonasmontse designofarandomizedcontrolledtrialtoevaluateeffectivenessofmethotrexateversusprednisoneasfirstlinetreatmentforpulmonarysarcoidosisthepredmethstudy AT moorcatharinac designofarandomizedcontrolledtrialtoevaluateeffectivenessofmethotrexateversusprednisoneasfirstlinetreatmentforpulmonarysarcoidosisthepredmethstudy AT vanmoorselcolinehm designofarandomizedcontrolledtrialtoevaluateeffectivenessofmethotrexateversusprednisoneasfirstlinetreatmentforpulmonarysarcoidosisthepredmethstudy AT koolmirjam designofarandomizedcontrolledtrialtoevaluateeffectivenessofmethotrexateversusprednisoneasfirstlinetreatmentforpulmonarysarcoidosisthepredmethstudy AT kraaijvangerraisa designofarandomizedcontrolledtrialtoevaluateeffectivenessofmethotrexateversusprednisoneasfirstlinetreatmentforpulmonarysarcoidosisthepredmethstudy AT gruttersjanc designofarandomizedcontrolledtrialtoevaluateeffectivenessofmethotrexateversusprednisoneasfirstlinetreatmentforpulmonarysarcoidosisthepredmethstudy AT overgaauwmayka designofarandomizedcontrolledtrialtoevaluateeffectivenessofmethotrexateversusprednisoneasfirstlinetreatmentforpulmonarysarcoidosisthepredmethstudy AT veltkampmarcel designofarandomizedcontrolledtrialtoevaluateeffectivenessofmethotrexateversusprednisoneasfirstlinetreatmentforpulmonarysarcoidosisthepredmethstudy AT wijsenbeekmarliess designofarandomizedcontrolledtrialtoevaluateeffectivenessofmethotrexateversusprednisoneasfirstlinetreatmentforpulmonarysarcoidosisthepredmethstudy AT designofarandomizedcontrolledtrialtoevaluateeffectivenessofmethotrexateversusprednisoneasfirstlinetreatmentforpulmonarysarcoidosisthepredmethstudy |