Cargando…

Development, testing and use of data extraction forms in systematic reviews: a review of methodological guidance

BACKGROUND: Data extraction forms link systematic reviews with primary research and provide the foundation for appraising, analysing, summarising and interpreting a body of evidence. This makes their development, pilot testing and use a crucial part of the systematic reviews process. Several studies...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Büchter, Roland Brian, Weise, Alina, Pieper, Dawid
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BioMed Central 2020
Materias:	Research Article
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7574308/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33076832 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-01143-3

Ejemplares similares

Assessing transferability in systematic reviews of health economic evaluations – a review of methodological guidance
por: Weise, Alina, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Reporting of methods to prepare, pilot and perform data extraction in systematic reviews: analysis of a sample of 152 Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews
por: Büchter, Roland Brian, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Quality ratings of reviews in overviews: a comparison of reviews with and without dual (co-)authorship
por: Pieper, Dawid, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions published 2012–2016: protocol for a systematic review
por: Pieper, Dawid, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Frequency of data extraction errors and methods to increase data extraction quality: a methodological review
por: Mathes, Tim, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Database combinations to retrieve systematic reviews in overviews of reviews: a methodological study
por: Goossen, Käthe, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Methodological assessment of systematic reviews of in-vitro dental studies
por: Hammel, Christopher, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

A new method for testing reproducibility in systematic reviews was developed, but needs more testing
por: Pieper, Dawid, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Single screening versus conventional double screening for study selection in systematic reviews: a methodological systematic review
por: Waffenschmidt, Siw, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Interventions for reducing self-stigma in people with mental illnesses: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials
por: Büchter, Roland Brian, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Strategies used to manage overlap of primary study data by exercise-related overviews: protocol for a systematic methodological review
por: Gutierrez-Arias, Ruvistay, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Investigating clinical heterogeneity in systematic reviews: a methodologic review of guidance in the literature
por: Gagnier, Joel J, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

An algorithm for the classification of study designs to assess diagnostic, prognostic and predictive test accuracy in systematic reviews
por: Mathes, Tim, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Comparison of methodological quality rating of systematic reviews on neuropathic pain using AMSTAR and R-AMSTAR
por: Dosenovic, Svjetlana, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Existing guidance on reporting of consensus methodology: a systematic review to inform ACCORD guideline development
por: van Zuuren, Esther J, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Developing an integrated multilevel model of uncertainty in health care: a qualitative systematic review and thematic synthesis
por: Eachempati, Prashanti, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Adherence influencing factors – a systematic review of systematic reviews
por: Mathes, Tim, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Safety of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors in older adults with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
por: Doni, Katharina, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Relationship between surgeon volume and outcomes: a systematic review of systematic reviews
por: Morche, Johannes, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Guidance for updating clinical practice guidelines: a systematic review of methodological handbooks
por: Vernooij, Robin WM, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Methodological guidance for the evaluation and updating of clinical prediction models: a systematic review
por: Binuya, M. A. E., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Where to prospectively register a systematic review
por: Pieper, Dawid, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Use of existing systematic reviews for the development of evidence-based vaccination recommendations: Guidance from the SYSVAC expert panel
por: Pilic, Antonia, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Words or numbers? Communicating risk of adverse effects in written consumer health information: a systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Büchter, Roland Brian, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Increasing value and reducing waste in data extraction for systematic reviews: tracking data in data extraction forms
por: Shokraneh, Farhad, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Methodological review and detailed guidance for the life cycle interpretation phase
por: Laurent, Alexis, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Definition of a systematic review used in overviews of systematic reviews, meta-epidemiological studies and textbooks
por: Krnic Martinic, Marina, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Response to ‘Increasing value and reducing waste in data extraction for systematic reviews: tracking data in data extraction forms’
por: Jap, Jens, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

A systematic review of the impact of center volume in dialysis
por: Pieper, Dawid, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Uptake of newer methodological developments and the deployment of meta-analysis in diagnostic test research: a systematic review
por: Willis, Brian H, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

A systematic review of the impact of volume of surgery and specialization in Norwood procedure
por: Pieper, Dawid, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Can AMSTAR also be applied to systematic reviews of non-randomized studies?
por: Pieper, Dawid, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

The methodological quality of systematic reviews on the treatment of adult major depression needs improvement according to AMSTAR 2: A cross-sectional study
por: Matthias, Katja, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Methods and reporting of systematic reviews of comparative accuracy were deficient: a methodological survey and proposed guidance
por: Takwoingi, Yemisi, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

The Commercial Determinants of Health and Evidence Synthesis (CODES): methodological guidance for systematic reviews and other evidence syntheses
por: Petticrew, Mark, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Managing overlap of primary study results across systematic reviews: practical considerations for authors of overviews of reviews
por: Lunny, Carole, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Is reusing text from a protocol in the completed systematic review acceptable?
por: Pieper, Dawid, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Factors influencing adherence in Hepatitis-C infected patients: a systematic review
por: Mathes, Tim, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Clarifying the distinction between case series and cohort studies in systematic reviews of comparative studies: potential impact on body of evidence and workload
por: Mathes, Tim, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Assessment of redundancy, methodological and reporting quality, and potential discrepancies of results of systematic reviews of early mobilisation of critically ill adults: a meta-research protocol
por: Gutierrez-Arias, Ruvistay, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_s4kkl8nppf7oq5mng9001la6ql