Cargando…

Comparison of oral glucose tolerance test and ambulatory glycaemic profiles in pregnant women in Uganda with gestational diabetes using the FreeStyle Libre flash glucose monitoring system

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of hyperglycaemia in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) is challenging. Blood glucose levels obtained during oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) may not reflect home glycaemic profiles. We compare OGTT results with home glycaemic profiles obtained using the FreeStyle Libre continuous...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Milln, J. M., Walugembe, E., Ssentayi, S., Nkabura, H., Jones, A. G., Nyirenda, M. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7574406/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33076849
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03325-9
_version_ 1783597630636425216
author Milln, J. M.
Walugembe, E.
Ssentayi, S.
Nkabura, H.
Jones, A. G.
Nyirenda, M. J.
author_facet Milln, J. M.
Walugembe, E.
Ssentayi, S.
Nkabura, H.
Jones, A. G.
Nyirenda, M. J.
author_sort Milln, J. M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of hyperglycaemia in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) is challenging. Blood glucose levels obtained during oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) may not reflect home glycaemic profiles. We compare OGTT results with home glycaemic profiles obtained using the FreeStyle Libre continuous glucose monitoring device (FSL-CGM). METHODS: Twenty-eight women (20 with gestational diabetes [GDM], 8 controls) were recruited following OGTT between 24 and 28 weeks of gestation. All women wore the FSL-CGM device for 48–96 h at home in early third trimester, and recorded a meal diary. OGTT was repeated on the final day of FSL-CGM recording. OGTT results were compared with ambulatory glycaemic variables, and repeat OGTT was undertaken whilst wearing FSL-CGM to determine accuracy of the device. RESULTS: FSL-CGM results were available for 27/28 women with mean data capture 92.8%. There were significant differences in the ambulatory fasting, post-prandial peaks, and mean glucose between controls in whom both primary and secondary OGTT was normal (n = 6) and those with two abnormal OGTTs or “true” GDM (n = 7). There was no difference in ambulatory mean glucose between these controls and the 13 women who had an abnormal primary OGTT and normal repeat OGTT. These participants had significantly lower body mass index (BMI) than the true GDM group (29.0 Vs 36.3 kg/m(2), p-value 0.014). Paired OGTT/FSL-CGM readings revealed a Mean Absolute difference (MAD) -0.58 mmol/L and Mean Absolute Relative Difference (MARD) -11.9%. Bland-Altman plot suggests FSL-CGM underestimated blood glucose by approximately 0.78 mmol/L. CONCLUSION: Diagnosis of GDM on a single OGTT identifies a proportion of women who do not have a significantly higher home glucose levels than controls. This raises questions about factors which may affect the reproducibility of OGTT in this population, including food insecurity and atypical phenotypes of diabetes. More investigation is needed to understand the suitability of the OGTT as a diagnostic test in sub-Saharan Africa.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7574406
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75744062020-10-20 Comparison of oral glucose tolerance test and ambulatory glycaemic profiles in pregnant women in Uganda with gestational diabetes using the FreeStyle Libre flash glucose monitoring system Milln, J. M. Walugembe, E. Ssentayi, S. Nkabura, H. Jones, A. G. Nyirenda, M. J. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of hyperglycaemia in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) is challenging. Blood glucose levels obtained during oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) may not reflect home glycaemic profiles. We compare OGTT results with home glycaemic profiles obtained using the FreeStyle Libre continuous glucose monitoring device (FSL-CGM). METHODS: Twenty-eight women (20 with gestational diabetes [GDM], 8 controls) were recruited following OGTT between 24 and 28 weeks of gestation. All women wore the FSL-CGM device for 48–96 h at home in early third trimester, and recorded a meal diary. OGTT was repeated on the final day of FSL-CGM recording. OGTT results were compared with ambulatory glycaemic variables, and repeat OGTT was undertaken whilst wearing FSL-CGM to determine accuracy of the device. RESULTS: FSL-CGM results were available for 27/28 women with mean data capture 92.8%. There were significant differences in the ambulatory fasting, post-prandial peaks, and mean glucose between controls in whom both primary and secondary OGTT was normal (n = 6) and those with two abnormal OGTTs or “true” GDM (n = 7). There was no difference in ambulatory mean glucose between these controls and the 13 women who had an abnormal primary OGTT and normal repeat OGTT. These participants had significantly lower body mass index (BMI) than the true GDM group (29.0 Vs 36.3 kg/m(2), p-value 0.014). Paired OGTT/FSL-CGM readings revealed a Mean Absolute difference (MAD) -0.58 mmol/L and Mean Absolute Relative Difference (MARD) -11.9%. Bland-Altman plot suggests FSL-CGM underestimated blood glucose by approximately 0.78 mmol/L. CONCLUSION: Diagnosis of GDM on a single OGTT identifies a proportion of women who do not have a significantly higher home glucose levels than controls. This raises questions about factors which may affect the reproducibility of OGTT in this population, including food insecurity and atypical phenotypes of diabetes. More investigation is needed to understand the suitability of the OGTT as a diagnostic test in sub-Saharan Africa. BioMed Central 2020-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7574406/ /pubmed/33076849 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03325-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Milln, J. M.
Walugembe, E.
Ssentayi, S.
Nkabura, H.
Jones, A. G.
Nyirenda, M. J.
Comparison of oral glucose tolerance test and ambulatory glycaemic profiles in pregnant women in Uganda with gestational diabetes using the FreeStyle Libre flash glucose monitoring system
title Comparison of oral glucose tolerance test and ambulatory glycaemic profiles in pregnant women in Uganda with gestational diabetes using the FreeStyle Libre flash glucose monitoring system
title_full Comparison of oral glucose tolerance test and ambulatory glycaemic profiles in pregnant women in Uganda with gestational diabetes using the FreeStyle Libre flash glucose monitoring system
title_fullStr Comparison of oral glucose tolerance test and ambulatory glycaemic profiles in pregnant women in Uganda with gestational diabetes using the FreeStyle Libre flash glucose monitoring system
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of oral glucose tolerance test and ambulatory glycaemic profiles in pregnant women in Uganda with gestational diabetes using the FreeStyle Libre flash glucose monitoring system
title_short Comparison of oral glucose tolerance test and ambulatory glycaemic profiles in pregnant women in Uganda with gestational diabetes using the FreeStyle Libre flash glucose monitoring system
title_sort comparison of oral glucose tolerance test and ambulatory glycaemic profiles in pregnant women in uganda with gestational diabetes using the freestyle libre flash glucose monitoring system
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7574406/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33076849
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03325-9
work_keys_str_mv AT millnjm comparisonoforalglucosetolerancetestandambulatoryglycaemicprofilesinpregnantwomeninugandawithgestationaldiabetesusingthefreestylelibreflashglucosemonitoringsystem
AT walugembee comparisonoforalglucosetolerancetestandambulatoryglycaemicprofilesinpregnantwomeninugandawithgestationaldiabetesusingthefreestylelibreflashglucosemonitoringsystem
AT ssentayis comparisonoforalglucosetolerancetestandambulatoryglycaemicprofilesinpregnantwomeninugandawithgestationaldiabetesusingthefreestylelibreflashglucosemonitoringsystem
AT nkaburah comparisonoforalglucosetolerancetestandambulatoryglycaemicprofilesinpregnantwomeninugandawithgestationaldiabetesusingthefreestylelibreflashglucosemonitoringsystem
AT jonesag comparisonoforalglucosetolerancetestandambulatoryglycaemicprofilesinpregnantwomeninugandawithgestationaldiabetesusingthefreestylelibreflashglucosemonitoringsystem
AT nyirendamj comparisonoforalglucosetolerancetestandambulatoryglycaemicprofilesinpregnantwomeninugandawithgestationaldiabetesusingthefreestylelibreflashglucosemonitoringsystem