Cargando…
Identifying interventions with Gypsies, Roma and Travellers to promote immunisation uptake: methodological approach and findings
BACKGROUND: In the UK, Gypsy, Roma and Traveller (GRT) communities are generally considered to be at risk of low or variable immunisation uptake. Many strategies to increase uptake for the general population are relevant for GRT communities, however additional approaches may also be required, and im...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7574499/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33081730 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09614-4 |
_version_ | 1783597649637670912 |
---|---|
author | Dyson, Lisa Bedford, Helen Condon, Louise Emslie, Carol Ireland, Lana Mytton, Julie Overend, Karen Redsell, Sarah Richardson, Zoe Jackson, Cath |
author_facet | Dyson, Lisa Bedford, Helen Condon, Louise Emslie, Carol Ireland, Lana Mytton, Julie Overend, Karen Redsell, Sarah Richardson, Zoe Jackson, Cath |
author_sort | Dyson, Lisa |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In the UK, Gypsy, Roma and Traveller (GRT) communities are generally considered to be at risk of low or variable immunisation uptake. Many strategies to increase uptake for the general population are relevant for GRT communities, however additional approaches may also be required, and importantly one cannot assume that “one size fits all”. Robust methods are needed to identify content and methods of delivery that are likely to be acceptable, feasible, effective and cost effective. In this paper, we describe the approach taken to identify potential interventions to increase uptake of immunisations in six GRT communities in four UK cities; and present the list of prioritised interventions that emerged. METHODS: This work was conducted in three stages: (1) a modified intervention mapping process to identify ideas for potential interventions; (2) a two-step prioritisation activity at workshops with 51 GRTs and 25 Service Providers to agree a prioritised list of potentially feasible and acceptable interventions for each community; (3) cross-community synthesis to produce a final list of interventions. The theoretical framework underpinning the study was the Social Ecological Model. RESULTS: Five priority interventions were agreed across communities and Service Providers to improve the uptake of immunisation amongst GRTs who are housed or settled on an authorised site. These interventions are all at the Institutional (e.g. cultural competence training) and Policy (e.g. protected funding) levels of the Social Ecological Model. CONCLUSIONS: The “upstream” nature of the five interventions reinforces the key role of GP practices, frontline workers and wider NHS systems on improving immunisation uptake. All five interventions have potentially broader applicability than GRTs. We believe that their impact would be enhanced if delivered as a combined package. The robust intervention development and co-production methods described could usefully be applied to other communities where poor uptake of immunisation is a concern. STUDY REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN20019630, Date of registration 01-08-2013, Prospectively registered. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7574499 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75744992020-10-21 Identifying interventions with Gypsies, Roma and Travellers to promote immunisation uptake: methodological approach and findings Dyson, Lisa Bedford, Helen Condon, Louise Emslie, Carol Ireland, Lana Mytton, Julie Overend, Karen Redsell, Sarah Richardson, Zoe Jackson, Cath BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: In the UK, Gypsy, Roma and Traveller (GRT) communities are generally considered to be at risk of low or variable immunisation uptake. Many strategies to increase uptake for the general population are relevant for GRT communities, however additional approaches may also be required, and importantly one cannot assume that “one size fits all”. Robust methods are needed to identify content and methods of delivery that are likely to be acceptable, feasible, effective and cost effective. In this paper, we describe the approach taken to identify potential interventions to increase uptake of immunisations in six GRT communities in four UK cities; and present the list of prioritised interventions that emerged. METHODS: This work was conducted in three stages: (1) a modified intervention mapping process to identify ideas for potential interventions; (2) a two-step prioritisation activity at workshops with 51 GRTs and 25 Service Providers to agree a prioritised list of potentially feasible and acceptable interventions for each community; (3) cross-community synthesis to produce a final list of interventions. The theoretical framework underpinning the study was the Social Ecological Model. RESULTS: Five priority interventions were agreed across communities and Service Providers to improve the uptake of immunisation amongst GRTs who are housed or settled on an authorised site. These interventions are all at the Institutional (e.g. cultural competence training) and Policy (e.g. protected funding) levels of the Social Ecological Model. CONCLUSIONS: The “upstream” nature of the five interventions reinforces the key role of GP practices, frontline workers and wider NHS systems on improving immunisation uptake. All five interventions have potentially broader applicability than GRTs. We believe that their impact would be enhanced if delivered as a combined package. The robust intervention development and co-production methods described could usefully be applied to other communities where poor uptake of immunisation is a concern. STUDY REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN20019630, Date of registration 01-08-2013, Prospectively registered. BioMed Central 2020-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7574499/ /pubmed/33081730 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09614-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Dyson, Lisa Bedford, Helen Condon, Louise Emslie, Carol Ireland, Lana Mytton, Julie Overend, Karen Redsell, Sarah Richardson, Zoe Jackson, Cath Identifying interventions with Gypsies, Roma and Travellers to promote immunisation uptake: methodological approach and findings |
title | Identifying interventions with Gypsies, Roma and Travellers to promote immunisation uptake: methodological approach and findings |
title_full | Identifying interventions with Gypsies, Roma and Travellers to promote immunisation uptake: methodological approach and findings |
title_fullStr | Identifying interventions with Gypsies, Roma and Travellers to promote immunisation uptake: methodological approach and findings |
title_full_unstemmed | Identifying interventions with Gypsies, Roma and Travellers to promote immunisation uptake: methodological approach and findings |
title_short | Identifying interventions with Gypsies, Roma and Travellers to promote immunisation uptake: methodological approach and findings |
title_sort | identifying interventions with gypsies, roma and travellers to promote immunisation uptake: methodological approach and findings |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7574499/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33081730 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09614-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dysonlisa identifyinginterventionswithgypsiesromaandtravellerstopromoteimmunisationuptakemethodologicalapproachandfindings AT bedfordhelen identifyinginterventionswithgypsiesromaandtravellerstopromoteimmunisationuptakemethodologicalapproachandfindings AT condonlouise identifyinginterventionswithgypsiesromaandtravellerstopromoteimmunisationuptakemethodologicalapproachandfindings AT emsliecarol identifyinginterventionswithgypsiesromaandtravellerstopromoteimmunisationuptakemethodologicalapproachandfindings AT irelandlana identifyinginterventionswithgypsiesromaandtravellerstopromoteimmunisationuptakemethodologicalapproachandfindings AT myttonjulie identifyinginterventionswithgypsiesromaandtravellerstopromoteimmunisationuptakemethodologicalapproachandfindings AT overendkaren identifyinginterventionswithgypsiesromaandtravellerstopromoteimmunisationuptakemethodologicalapproachandfindings AT redsellsarah identifyinginterventionswithgypsiesromaandtravellerstopromoteimmunisationuptakemethodologicalapproachandfindings AT richardsonzoe identifyinginterventionswithgypsiesromaandtravellerstopromoteimmunisationuptakemethodologicalapproachandfindings AT jacksoncath identifyinginterventionswithgypsiesromaandtravellerstopromoteimmunisationuptakemethodologicalapproachandfindings |