Cargando…
Living risk prediction algorithm (QCOVID) for risk of hospital admission and mortality from coronavirus 19 in adults: national derivation and validation cohort study
OBJECTIVE: To derive and validate a risk prediction algorithm to estimate hospital admission and mortality outcomes from coronavirus disease 2019 (covid-19) in adults. DESIGN: Population based cohort study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: QResearch database, comprising 1205 general practices in England wi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7574532/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33082154 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m3731 |
_version_ | 1783597652652326912 |
---|---|
author | Clift, Ash K Coupland, Carol A C Keogh, Ruth H Diaz-Ordaz, Karla Williamson, Elizabeth Harrison, Ewen M Hayward, Andrew Hemingway, Harry Horby, Peter Mehta, Nisha Benger, Jonathan Khunti, Kamlesh Spiegelhalter, David Sheikh, Aziz Valabhji, Jonathan Lyons, Ronan A Robson, John Semple, Malcolm G Kee, Frank Johnson, Peter Jebb, Susan Williams, Tony Hippisley-Cox, Julia |
author_facet | Clift, Ash K Coupland, Carol A C Keogh, Ruth H Diaz-Ordaz, Karla Williamson, Elizabeth Harrison, Ewen M Hayward, Andrew Hemingway, Harry Horby, Peter Mehta, Nisha Benger, Jonathan Khunti, Kamlesh Spiegelhalter, David Sheikh, Aziz Valabhji, Jonathan Lyons, Ronan A Robson, John Semple, Malcolm G Kee, Frank Johnson, Peter Jebb, Susan Williams, Tony Hippisley-Cox, Julia |
author_sort | Clift, Ash K |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To derive and validate a risk prediction algorithm to estimate hospital admission and mortality outcomes from coronavirus disease 2019 (covid-19) in adults. DESIGN: Population based cohort study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: QResearch database, comprising 1205 general practices in England with linkage to covid-19 test results, Hospital Episode Statistics, and death registry data. 6.08 million adults aged 19-100 years were included in the derivation dataset and 2.17 million in the validation dataset. The derivation and first validation cohort period was 24 January 2020 to 30 April 2020. The second temporal validation cohort covered the period 1 May 2020 to 30 June 2020. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was time to death from covid-19, defined as death due to confirmed or suspected covid-19 as per the death certification or death occurring in a person with confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in the period 24 January to 30 April 2020. The secondary outcome was time to hospital admission with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. Models were fitted in the derivation cohort to derive risk equations using a range of predictor variables. Performance, including measures of discrimination and calibration, was evaluated in each validation time period. RESULTS: 4384 deaths from covid-19 occurred in the derivation cohort during follow-up and 1722 in the first validation cohort period and 621 in the second validation cohort period. The final risk algorithms included age, ethnicity, deprivation, body mass index, and a range of comorbidities. The algorithm had good calibration in the first validation cohort. For deaths from covid-19 in men, it explained 73.1% (95% confidence interval 71.9% to 74.3%) of the variation in time to death (R(2)); the D statistic was 3.37 (95% confidence interval 3.27 to 3.47), and Harrell’s C was 0.928 (0.919 to 0.938). Similar results were obtained for women, for both outcomes, and in both time periods. In the top 5% of patients with the highest predicted risks of death, the sensitivity for identifying deaths within 97 days was 75.7%. People in the top 20% of predicted risk of death accounted for 94% of all deaths from covid-19. CONCLUSION: The QCOVID population based risk algorithm performed well, showing very high levels of discrimination for deaths and hospital admissions due to covid-19. The absolute risks presented, however, will change over time in line with the prevailing SARS-C0V-2 infection rate and the extent of social distancing measures in place, so they should be interpreted with caution. The model can be recalibrated for different time periods, however, and has the potential to be dynamically updated as the pandemic evolves. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7574532 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75745322020-10-21 Living risk prediction algorithm (QCOVID) for risk of hospital admission and mortality from coronavirus 19 in adults: national derivation and validation cohort study Clift, Ash K Coupland, Carol A C Keogh, Ruth H Diaz-Ordaz, Karla Williamson, Elizabeth Harrison, Ewen M Hayward, Andrew Hemingway, Harry Horby, Peter Mehta, Nisha Benger, Jonathan Khunti, Kamlesh Spiegelhalter, David Sheikh, Aziz Valabhji, Jonathan Lyons, Ronan A Robson, John Semple, Malcolm G Kee, Frank Johnson, Peter Jebb, Susan Williams, Tony Hippisley-Cox, Julia BMJ Research OBJECTIVE: To derive and validate a risk prediction algorithm to estimate hospital admission and mortality outcomes from coronavirus disease 2019 (covid-19) in adults. DESIGN: Population based cohort study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: QResearch database, comprising 1205 general practices in England with linkage to covid-19 test results, Hospital Episode Statistics, and death registry data. 6.08 million adults aged 19-100 years were included in the derivation dataset and 2.17 million in the validation dataset. The derivation and first validation cohort period was 24 January 2020 to 30 April 2020. The second temporal validation cohort covered the period 1 May 2020 to 30 June 2020. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was time to death from covid-19, defined as death due to confirmed or suspected covid-19 as per the death certification or death occurring in a person with confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in the period 24 January to 30 April 2020. The secondary outcome was time to hospital admission with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. Models were fitted in the derivation cohort to derive risk equations using a range of predictor variables. Performance, including measures of discrimination and calibration, was evaluated in each validation time period. RESULTS: 4384 deaths from covid-19 occurred in the derivation cohort during follow-up and 1722 in the first validation cohort period and 621 in the second validation cohort period. The final risk algorithms included age, ethnicity, deprivation, body mass index, and a range of comorbidities. The algorithm had good calibration in the first validation cohort. For deaths from covid-19 in men, it explained 73.1% (95% confidence interval 71.9% to 74.3%) of the variation in time to death (R(2)); the D statistic was 3.37 (95% confidence interval 3.27 to 3.47), and Harrell’s C was 0.928 (0.919 to 0.938). Similar results were obtained for women, for both outcomes, and in both time periods. In the top 5% of patients with the highest predicted risks of death, the sensitivity for identifying deaths within 97 days was 75.7%. People in the top 20% of predicted risk of death accounted for 94% of all deaths from covid-19. CONCLUSION: The QCOVID population based risk algorithm performed well, showing very high levels of discrimination for deaths and hospital admissions due to covid-19. The absolute risks presented, however, will change over time in line with the prevailing SARS-C0V-2 infection rate and the extent of social distancing measures in place, so they should be interpreted with caution. The model can be recalibrated for different time periods, however, and has the potential to be dynamically updated as the pandemic evolves. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2020-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7574532/ /pubmed/33082154 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m3731 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Research Clift, Ash K Coupland, Carol A C Keogh, Ruth H Diaz-Ordaz, Karla Williamson, Elizabeth Harrison, Ewen M Hayward, Andrew Hemingway, Harry Horby, Peter Mehta, Nisha Benger, Jonathan Khunti, Kamlesh Spiegelhalter, David Sheikh, Aziz Valabhji, Jonathan Lyons, Ronan A Robson, John Semple, Malcolm G Kee, Frank Johnson, Peter Jebb, Susan Williams, Tony Hippisley-Cox, Julia Living risk prediction algorithm (QCOVID) for risk of hospital admission and mortality from coronavirus 19 in adults: national derivation and validation cohort study |
title | Living risk prediction algorithm (QCOVID) for risk of hospital admission and mortality from coronavirus 19 in adults: national derivation and validation cohort study |
title_full | Living risk prediction algorithm (QCOVID) for risk of hospital admission and mortality from coronavirus 19 in adults: national derivation and validation cohort study |
title_fullStr | Living risk prediction algorithm (QCOVID) for risk of hospital admission and mortality from coronavirus 19 in adults: national derivation and validation cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Living risk prediction algorithm (QCOVID) for risk of hospital admission and mortality from coronavirus 19 in adults: national derivation and validation cohort study |
title_short | Living risk prediction algorithm (QCOVID) for risk of hospital admission and mortality from coronavirus 19 in adults: national derivation and validation cohort study |
title_sort | living risk prediction algorithm (qcovid) for risk of hospital admission and mortality from coronavirus 19 in adults: national derivation and validation cohort study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7574532/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33082154 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m3731 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cliftashk livingriskpredictionalgorithmqcovidforriskofhospitaladmissionandmortalityfromcoronavirus19inadultsnationalderivationandvalidationcohortstudy AT couplandcarolac livingriskpredictionalgorithmqcovidforriskofhospitaladmissionandmortalityfromcoronavirus19inadultsnationalderivationandvalidationcohortstudy AT keoghruthh livingriskpredictionalgorithmqcovidforriskofhospitaladmissionandmortalityfromcoronavirus19inadultsnationalderivationandvalidationcohortstudy AT diazordazkarla livingriskpredictionalgorithmqcovidforriskofhospitaladmissionandmortalityfromcoronavirus19inadultsnationalderivationandvalidationcohortstudy AT williamsonelizabeth livingriskpredictionalgorithmqcovidforriskofhospitaladmissionandmortalityfromcoronavirus19inadultsnationalderivationandvalidationcohortstudy AT harrisonewenm livingriskpredictionalgorithmqcovidforriskofhospitaladmissionandmortalityfromcoronavirus19inadultsnationalderivationandvalidationcohortstudy AT haywardandrew livingriskpredictionalgorithmqcovidforriskofhospitaladmissionandmortalityfromcoronavirus19inadultsnationalderivationandvalidationcohortstudy AT hemingwayharry livingriskpredictionalgorithmqcovidforriskofhospitaladmissionandmortalityfromcoronavirus19inadultsnationalderivationandvalidationcohortstudy AT horbypeter livingriskpredictionalgorithmqcovidforriskofhospitaladmissionandmortalityfromcoronavirus19inadultsnationalderivationandvalidationcohortstudy AT mehtanisha livingriskpredictionalgorithmqcovidforriskofhospitaladmissionandmortalityfromcoronavirus19inadultsnationalderivationandvalidationcohortstudy AT bengerjonathan livingriskpredictionalgorithmqcovidforriskofhospitaladmissionandmortalityfromcoronavirus19inadultsnationalderivationandvalidationcohortstudy AT khuntikamlesh livingriskpredictionalgorithmqcovidforriskofhospitaladmissionandmortalityfromcoronavirus19inadultsnationalderivationandvalidationcohortstudy AT spiegelhalterdavid livingriskpredictionalgorithmqcovidforriskofhospitaladmissionandmortalityfromcoronavirus19inadultsnationalderivationandvalidationcohortstudy AT sheikhaziz livingriskpredictionalgorithmqcovidforriskofhospitaladmissionandmortalityfromcoronavirus19inadultsnationalderivationandvalidationcohortstudy AT valabhjijonathan livingriskpredictionalgorithmqcovidforriskofhospitaladmissionandmortalityfromcoronavirus19inadultsnationalderivationandvalidationcohortstudy AT lyonsronana livingriskpredictionalgorithmqcovidforriskofhospitaladmissionandmortalityfromcoronavirus19inadultsnationalderivationandvalidationcohortstudy AT robsonjohn livingriskpredictionalgorithmqcovidforriskofhospitaladmissionandmortalityfromcoronavirus19inadultsnationalderivationandvalidationcohortstudy AT semplemalcolmg livingriskpredictionalgorithmqcovidforriskofhospitaladmissionandmortalityfromcoronavirus19inadultsnationalderivationandvalidationcohortstudy AT keefrank livingriskpredictionalgorithmqcovidforriskofhospitaladmissionandmortalityfromcoronavirus19inadultsnationalderivationandvalidationcohortstudy AT johnsonpeter livingriskpredictionalgorithmqcovidforriskofhospitaladmissionandmortalityfromcoronavirus19inadultsnationalderivationandvalidationcohortstudy AT jebbsusan livingriskpredictionalgorithmqcovidforriskofhospitaladmissionandmortalityfromcoronavirus19inadultsnationalderivationandvalidationcohortstudy AT williamstony livingriskpredictionalgorithmqcovidforriskofhospitaladmissionandmortalityfromcoronavirus19inadultsnationalderivationandvalidationcohortstudy AT hippisleycoxjulia livingriskpredictionalgorithmqcovidforriskofhospitaladmissionandmortalityfromcoronavirus19inadultsnationalderivationandvalidationcohortstudy |