Cargando…

Comparison of efficacy of corticosteroid injection versus extracorporeal shock wave therapy on inferior trigger points in the quadratus lumborum muscle: a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND: In this study, we aimed to compare the efficacy of corticosteroid trigger point injection (TPI) versus extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) on inferior trigger points in the quadratus lumborum (QL) muscle. METHODS: In this single-blind randomized clinical trial, 54 low back pain pati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eftekharsadat, Bina, Fasaie, Negar, Golalizadeh, Dina, Babaei-Ghazani, Arash, Jahanjou, Fatemeh, Eslampoor, Yashar, Dolatkhah, Neda
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7574569/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33076888
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03714-3
_version_ 1783597660183199744
author Eftekharsadat, Bina
Fasaie, Negar
Golalizadeh, Dina
Babaei-Ghazani, Arash
Jahanjou, Fatemeh
Eslampoor, Yashar
Dolatkhah, Neda
author_facet Eftekharsadat, Bina
Fasaie, Negar
Golalizadeh, Dina
Babaei-Ghazani, Arash
Jahanjou, Fatemeh
Eslampoor, Yashar
Dolatkhah, Neda
author_sort Eftekharsadat, Bina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In this study, we aimed to compare the efficacy of corticosteroid trigger point injection (TPI) versus extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) on inferior trigger points in the quadratus lumborum (QL) muscle. METHODS: In this single-blind randomized clinical trial, 54 low back pain patients with myofascial trigger points on QL muscle were investigated. Participants were randomly allocated into two groups with A and B pockets. Patients in group A underwent radial ESWT and received 5 treatment sessions (1 per week) and actually were not followed-up. However, patients in group B received corticosteroid TPI and received one session of corticosteroid treatment and followed-up for 4 weeks after injection. Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), visual analogue scale (VAS), pain pressure threshold (PPT) and short form (36) health survey (SF-36) were measured in both groups before, two weeks after and four weeks after intervention. RESULTS: The between group comparison indicated that corticosteroid TPI leaded to significant higher improvements of ODI (P-value< 0.01), VAS (P value< 0.001), and PPT (P-value = 0.001) scores compared to the ESWT group at two-week follow-up time-point. ESWT group recorded significant higher improvement of ODI (P-value< 0.01) and SF-36 (P-value< 0.001) compared to the corticosteroid TPI at 4th week post treatment evaluation. At four-week follow-up time-point, the patients in the ESWT group were 1.46 times more likely to achieve 30% reduction in VAS, 2.67 times more likely to achieve 30% reduction in ODI, and 2.30 times more likely to achieve 20% improvement in SF-36 compared to the participants in corticosteroid TPI group. These results refer to large effect size for all study outcomes in ESWT group (d = 4.72, d = 1.58, d = 5.48, and d = 7.47 for ODI, PPT, SF-36, and VAS, respectively). CONCLUSION: Corticosteroid TPI was more effective compared to ESWT in short-term controlling of pain and disability caused by myofascial pain syndrome of QL muscle. However, after 4 weeks treatment, ESWT further improved the quality of life and disability and was related with more probability of achievement the minimal clinically important difference concerning pain, disability and quality of life and large effect size for all study outcomes in treated patients compared to corticosteroid TPI. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.irct.ir, IRCT20100827004641N14, retrospectively registered 2019-01-19.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7574569
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75745692020-10-21 Comparison of efficacy of corticosteroid injection versus extracorporeal shock wave therapy on inferior trigger points in the quadratus lumborum muscle: a randomized clinical trial Eftekharsadat, Bina Fasaie, Negar Golalizadeh, Dina Babaei-Ghazani, Arash Jahanjou, Fatemeh Eslampoor, Yashar Dolatkhah, Neda BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: In this study, we aimed to compare the efficacy of corticosteroid trigger point injection (TPI) versus extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) on inferior trigger points in the quadratus lumborum (QL) muscle. METHODS: In this single-blind randomized clinical trial, 54 low back pain patients with myofascial trigger points on QL muscle were investigated. Participants were randomly allocated into two groups with A and B pockets. Patients in group A underwent radial ESWT and received 5 treatment sessions (1 per week) and actually were not followed-up. However, patients in group B received corticosteroid TPI and received one session of corticosteroid treatment and followed-up for 4 weeks after injection. Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), visual analogue scale (VAS), pain pressure threshold (PPT) and short form (36) health survey (SF-36) were measured in both groups before, two weeks after and four weeks after intervention. RESULTS: The between group comparison indicated that corticosteroid TPI leaded to significant higher improvements of ODI (P-value< 0.01), VAS (P value< 0.001), and PPT (P-value = 0.001) scores compared to the ESWT group at two-week follow-up time-point. ESWT group recorded significant higher improvement of ODI (P-value< 0.01) and SF-36 (P-value< 0.001) compared to the corticosteroid TPI at 4th week post treatment evaluation. At four-week follow-up time-point, the patients in the ESWT group were 1.46 times more likely to achieve 30% reduction in VAS, 2.67 times more likely to achieve 30% reduction in ODI, and 2.30 times more likely to achieve 20% improvement in SF-36 compared to the participants in corticosteroid TPI group. These results refer to large effect size for all study outcomes in ESWT group (d = 4.72, d = 1.58, d = 5.48, and d = 7.47 for ODI, PPT, SF-36, and VAS, respectively). CONCLUSION: Corticosteroid TPI was more effective compared to ESWT in short-term controlling of pain and disability caused by myofascial pain syndrome of QL muscle. However, after 4 weeks treatment, ESWT further improved the quality of life and disability and was related with more probability of achievement the minimal clinically important difference concerning pain, disability and quality of life and large effect size for all study outcomes in treated patients compared to corticosteroid TPI. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.irct.ir, IRCT20100827004641N14, retrospectively registered 2019-01-19. BioMed Central 2020-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7574569/ /pubmed/33076888 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03714-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Eftekharsadat, Bina
Fasaie, Negar
Golalizadeh, Dina
Babaei-Ghazani, Arash
Jahanjou, Fatemeh
Eslampoor, Yashar
Dolatkhah, Neda
Comparison of efficacy of corticosteroid injection versus extracorporeal shock wave therapy on inferior trigger points in the quadratus lumborum muscle: a randomized clinical trial
title Comparison of efficacy of corticosteroid injection versus extracorporeal shock wave therapy on inferior trigger points in the quadratus lumborum muscle: a randomized clinical trial
title_full Comparison of efficacy of corticosteroid injection versus extracorporeal shock wave therapy on inferior trigger points in the quadratus lumborum muscle: a randomized clinical trial
title_fullStr Comparison of efficacy of corticosteroid injection versus extracorporeal shock wave therapy on inferior trigger points in the quadratus lumborum muscle: a randomized clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of efficacy of corticosteroid injection versus extracorporeal shock wave therapy on inferior trigger points in the quadratus lumborum muscle: a randomized clinical trial
title_short Comparison of efficacy of corticosteroid injection versus extracorporeal shock wave therapy on inferior trigger points in the quadratus lumborum muscle: a randomized clinical trial
title_sort comparison of efficacy of corticosteroid injection versus extracorporeal shock wave therapy on inferior trigger points in the quadratus lumborum muscle: a randomized clinical trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7574569/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33076888
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03714-3
work_keys_str_mv AT eftekharsadatbina comparisonofefficacyofcorticosteroidinjectionversusextracorporealshockwavetherapyoninferiortriggerpointsinthequadratuslumborummusclearandomizedclinicaltrial
AT fasaienegar comparisonofefficacyofcorticosteroidinjectionversusextracorporealshockwavetherapyoninferiortriggerpointsinthequadratuslumborummusclearandomizedclinicaltrial
AT golalizadehdina comparisonofefficacyofcorticosteroidinjectionversusextracorporealshockwavetherapyoninferiortriggerpointsinthequadratuslumborummusclearandomizedclinicaltrial
AT babaeighazaniarash comparisonofefficacyofcorticosteroidinjectionversusextracorporealshockwavetherapyoninferiortriggerpointsinthequadratuslumborummusclearandomizedclinicaltrial
AT jahanjoufatemeh comparisonofefficacyofcorticosteroidinjectionversusextracorporealshockwavetherapyoninferiortriggerpointsinthequadratuslumborummusclearandomizedclinicaltrial
AT eslampooryashar comparisonofefficacyofcorticosteroidinjectionversusextracorporealshockwavetherapyoninferiortriggerpointsinthequadratuslumborummusclearandomizedclinicaltrial
AT dolatkhahneda comparisonofefficacyofcorticosteroidinjectionversusextracorporealshockwavetherapyoninferiortriggerpointsinthequadratuslumborummusclearandomizedclinicaltrial