Cargando…

Upadacitinib versus placebo or adalimumab with background methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate: a subgroup analysis of a phase III randomized controlled trial in Central and Eastern European patients

BACKGROUND: In the randomized, phase III, global SELECT-COMPARE study, upadacitinib 15 mg demonstrated efficacy at week 12 versus placebo and adalimumab with methotrexate (MTX) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response to MTX, which was maintained over 48 weeks. This post hoc ana...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pavelka, Karel, Szekanecz, Zoltán, Damjanov, Nemanja, Anić, Branimir, Tomšič, Matija, Mazurov, Vadim, Maksimovic, Marija, Nagy, Orsolya, Świerkot, Jerzy, Petranova, Tzvetanka, Veldi, Tiina, Baranauskaitė, Asta, Codreanu, Catalin, Andersone, Daina, Fleischmann, Roy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioExcel Publishing Ltd 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7574850/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33123205
http://dx.doi.org/10.7573/dic.2020-7-5
_version_ 1783597705819324416
author Pavelka, Karel
Szekanecz, Zoltán
Damjanov, Nemanja
Anić, Branimir
Tomšič, Matija
Mazurov, Vadim
Maksimovic, Marija
Nagy, Orsolya
Świerkot, Jerzy
Petranova, Tzvetanka
Veldi, Tiina
Baranauskaitė, Asta
Codreanu, Catalin
Andersone, Daina
Fleischmann, Roy
author_facet Pavelka, Karel
Szekanecz, Zoltán
Damjanov, Nemanja
Anić, Branimir
Tomšič, Matija
Mazurov, Vadim
Maksimovic, Marija
Nagy, Orsolya
Świerkot, Jerzy
Petranova, Tzvetanka
Veldi, Tiina
Baranauskaitė, Asta
Codreanu, Catalin
Andersone, Daina
Fleischmann, Roy
author_sort Pavelka, Karel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In the randomized, phase III, global SELECT-COMPARE study, upadacitinib 15 mg demonstrated efficacy at week 12 versus placebo and adalimumab with methotrexate (MTX) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response to MTX, which was maintained over 48 weeks. This post hoc analysis of SELECT-COMPARE reports the efficacy and safety of upadacitinib in Central and Eastern European (CEE) patients. METHODS: Patients were randomized 2:2:1 to upadacitinib 15 mg once daily, placebo, or adalimumab 40 mg every other week, and continued MTX. Efficacy and safety were assessed through 48 weeks. Primary endpoints were the achievement of ≥20% improvement in American College of Rheumatology response criteria and Disease Activity Score in 28 joints with C-reactive protein <2.6 responses at week 12 for upadacitinib versus placebo. No statistical comparisons were conducted. RESULTS: A total of 596 patients from 12 CEE countries were randomized. At week 12, a numerically greater proportion of patients receiving upadacitinib versus placebo or adalimumab achieved ≥20% improvement in American College of Rheumatology response criteria (72% versus 33% and 59%), Disease Activity Score in 28 joints with C-reactive protein <2.6 (26% versus 4% and 11%), low disease activity and remission, and improved physical function, with results maintained over 48 weeks. Upadacitinib treatment numerically inhibited structural progression versus placebo at week 26. Serious infection and herpes zoster rates were numerically higher with upadacitinib versus adalimumab (2.7 versus 1.7 and 2.3 versus 1.1 events/100 patient-years, respectively) over 48 weeks. CONCLUSION: Consistent with the global population of patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to MTX, in CEE patients, upadacitinib 15 mg demonstrated clinical and functional improvements versus placebo and adalimumab, radiographic improvements versus placebo, and reasonable safety, over 48 weeks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7574850
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioExcel Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75748502020-10-28 Upadacitinib versus placebo or adalimumab with background methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate: a subgroup analysis of a phase III randomized controlled trial in Central and Eastern European patients Pavelka, Karel Szekanecz, Zoltán Damjanov, Nemanja Anić, Branimir Tomšič, Matija Mazurov, Vadim Maksimovic, Marija Nagy, Orsolya Świerkot, Jerzy Petranova, Tzvetanka Veldi, Tiina Baranauskaitė, Asta Codreanu, Catalin Andersone, Daina Fleischmann, Roy Drugs Context Original Research BACKGROUND: In the randomized, phase III, global SELECT-COMPARE study, upadacitinib 15 mg demonstrated efficacy at week 12 versus placebo and adalimumab with methotrexate (MTX) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response to MTX, which was maintained over 48 weeks. This post hoc analysis of SELECT-COMPARE reports the efficacy and safety of upadacitinib in Central and Eastern European (CEE) patients. METHODS: Patients were randomized 2:2:1 to upadacitinib 15 mg once daily, placebo, or adalimumab 40 mg every other week, and continued MTX. Efficacy and safety were assessed through 48 weeks. Primary endpoints were the achievement of ≥20% improvement in American College of Rheumatology response criteria and Disease Activity Score in 28 joints with C-reactive protein <2.6 responses at week 12 for upadacitinib versus placebo. No statistical comparisons were conducted. RESULTS: A total of 596 patients from 12 CEE countries were randomized. At week 12, a numerically greater proportion of patients receiving upadacitinib versus placebo or adalimumab achieved ≥20% improvement in American College of Rheumatology response criteria (72% versus 33% and 59%), Disease Activity Score in 28 joints with C-reactive protein <2.6 (26% versus 4% and 11%), low disease activity and remission, and improved physical function, with results maintained over 48 weeks. Upadacitinib treatment numerically inhibited structural progression versus placebo at week 26. Serious infection and herpes zoster rates were numerically higher with upadacitinib versus adalimumab (2.7 versus 1.7 and 2.3 versus 1.1 events/100 patient-years, respectively) over 48 weeks. CONCLUSION: Consistent with the global population of patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to MTX, in CEE patients, upadacitinib 15 mg demonstrated clinical and functional improvements versus placebo and adalimumab, radiographic improvements versus placebo, and reasonable safety, over 48 weeks. BioExcel Publishing Ltd 2020-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7574850/ /pubmed/33123205 http://dx.doi.org/10.7573/dic.2020-7-5 Text en Copyright © 2020 Pavelka K, Szekanecz Z, Damjanov N, Anić B, Tomšič M, Mazurov V, Maksimovic M, Nagy O, Jerzy Świerkot J, Petranova T, Veldi T, Asta Baranauskaitė A, Codreanu C, Andersone D, Fleischmann R. Published by Drugs in Context under Creative Commons License Deed CC BY NC ND 4.0 which allows anyone to copy, distribute, and transmit the article provided it is properly attributed in the manner specified below. No commercial use without permission.
spellingShingle Original Research
Pavelka, Karel
Szekanecz, Zoltán
Damjanov, Nemanja
Anić, Branimir
Tomšič, Matija
Mazurov, Vadim
Maksimovic, Marija
Nagy, Orsolya
Świerkot, Jerzy
Petranova, Tzvetanka
Veldi, Tiina
Baranauskaitė, Asta
Codreanu, Catalin
Andersone, Daina
Fleischmann, Roy
Upadacitinib versus placebo or adalimumab with background methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate: a subgroup analysis of a phase III randomized controlled trial in Central and Eastern European patients
title Upadacitinib versus placebo or adalimumab with background methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate: a subgroup analysis of a phase III randomized controlled trial in Central and Eastern European patients
title_full Upadacitinib versus placebo or adalimumab with background methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate: a subgroup analysis of a phase III randomized controlled trial in Central and Eastern European patients
title_fullStr Upadacitinib versus placebo or adalimumab with background methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate: a subgroup analysis of a phase III randomized controlled trial in Central and Eastern European patients
title_full_unstemmed Upadacitinib versus placebo or adalimumab with background methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate: a subgroup analysis of a phase III randomized controlled trial in Central and Eastern European patients
title_short Upadacitinib versus placebo or adalimumab with background methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate: a subgroup analysis of a phase III randomized controlled trial in Central and Eastern European patients
title_sort upadacitinib versus placebo or adalimumab with background methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate: a subgroup analysis of a phase iii randomized controlled trial in central and eastern european patients
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7574850/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33123205
http://dx.doi.org/10.7573/dic.2020-7-5
work_keys_str_mv AT pavelkakarel upadacitinibversusplacebooradalimumabwithbackgroundmethotrexateinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisandaninadequateresponsetomethotrexateasubgroupanalysisofaphaseiiirandomizedcontrolledtrialincentralandeasterneuropeanpatients
AT szekaneczzoltan upadacitinibversusplacebooradalimumabwithbackgroundmethotrexateinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisandaninadequateresponsetomethotrexateasubgroupanalysisofaphaseiiirandomizedcontrolledtrialincentralandeasterneuropeanpatients
AT damjanovnemanja upadacitinibversusplacebooradalimumabwithbackgroundmethotrexateinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisandaninadequateresponsetomethotrexateasubgroupanalysisofaphaseiiirandomizedcontrolledtrialincentralandeasterneuropeanpatients
AT anicbranimir upadacitinibversusplacebooradalimumabwithbackgroundmethotrexateinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisandaninadequateresponsetomethotrexateasubgroupanalysisofaphaseiiirandomizedcontrolledtrialincentralandeasterneuropeanpatients
AT tomsicmatija upadacitinibversusplacebooradalimumabwithbackgroundmethotrexateinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisandaninadequateresponsetomethotrexateasubgroupanalysisofaphaseiiirandomizedcontrolledtrialincentralandeasterneuropeanpatients
AT mazurovvadim upadacitinibversusplacebooradalimumabwithbackgroundmethotrexateinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisandaninadequateresponsetomethotrexateasubgroupanalysisofaphaseiiirandomizedcontrolledtrialincentralandeasterneuropeanpatients
AT maksimovicmarija upadacitinibversusplacebooradalimumabwithbackgroundmethotrexateinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisandaninadequateresponsetomethotrexateasubgroupanalysisofaphaseiiirandomizedcontrolledtrialincentralandeasterneuropeanpatients
AT nagyorsolya upadacitinibversusplacebooradalimumabwithbackgroundmethotrexateinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisandaninadequateresponsetomethotrexateasubgroupanalysisofaphaseiiirandomizedcontrolledtrialincentralandeasterneuropeanpatients
AT swierkotjerzy upadacitinibversusplacebooradalimumabwithbackgroundmethotrexateinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisandaninadequateresponsetomethotrexateasubgroupanalysisofaphaseiiirandomizedcontrolledtrialincentralandeasterneuropeanpatients
AT petranovatzvetanka upadacitinibversusplacebooradalimumabwithbackgroundmethotrexateinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisandaninadequateresponsetomethotrexateasubgroupanalysisofaphaseiiirandomizedcontrolledtrialincentralandeasterneuropeanpatients
AT velditiina upadacitinibversusplacebooradalimumabwithbackgroundmethotrexateinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisandaninadequateresponsetomethotrexateasubgroupanalysisofaphaseiiirandomizedcontrolledtrialincentralandeasterneuropeanpatients
AT baranauskaiteasta upadacitinibversusplacebooradalimumabwithbackgroundmethotrexateinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisandaninadequateresponsetomethotrexateasubgroupanalysisofaphaseiiirandomizedcontrolledtrialincentralandeasterneuropeanpatients
AT codreanucatalin upadacitinibversusplacebooradalimumabwithbackgroundmethotrexateinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisandaninadequateresponsetomethotrexateasubgroupanalysisofaphaseiiirandomizedcontrolledtrialincentralandeasterneuropeanpatients
AT andersonedaina upadacitinibversusplacebooradalimumabwithbackgroundmethotrexateinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisandaninadequateresponsetomethotrexateasubgroupanalysisofaphaseiiirandomizedcontrolledtrialincentralandeasterneuropeanpatients
AT fleischmannroy upadacitinibversusplacebooradalimumabwithbackgroundmethotrexateinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisandaninadequateresponsetomethotrexateasubgroupanalysisofaphaseiiirandomizedcontrolledtrialincentralandeasterneuropeanpatients