Reinforcement Learning Enables Resource Partitioning in Foraging Bats

Every evening, from late spring to mid-summer, tens of thousands of hungry lactating female lesser long-nosed bats (Leptonycteris yerbabuenae) emerge from their roost and navigate over the Sonoran Desert, seeking for nectar and pollen [1, 2]. The bats roost in a huge maternal colony that is far from...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goldshtein, Aya, Handel, Michal, Eitan, Ofri, Bonstein, Afrine, Shaler, Talia, Collet, Simon, Greif, Stefan, Medellín, Rodrigo A., Emek, Yuval, Korman, Amos, Yovel, Yossi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cell Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7575196/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32822610
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2020.07.079
_version_ 1783597766054772736
author Goldshtein, Aya
Handel, Michal
Eitan, Ofri
Bonstein, Afrine
Shaler, Talia
Collet, Simon
Greif, Stefan
Medellín, Rodrigo A.
Emek, Yuval
Korman, Amos
Yovel, Yossi
author_facet Goldshtein, Aya
Handel, Michal
Eitan, Ofri
Bonstein, Afrine
Shaler, Talia
Collet, Simon
Greif, Stefan
Medellín, Rodrigo A.
Emek, Yuval
Korman, Amos
Yovel, Yossi
author_sort Goldshtein, Aya
collection PubMed
description Every evening, from late spring to mid-summer, tens of thousands of hungry lactating female lesser long-nosed bats (Leptonycteris yerbabuenae) emerge from their roost and navigate over the Sonoran Desert, seeking for nectar and pollen [1, 2]. The bats roost in a huge maternal colony that is far from the foraging grounds but allows their pups to thermoregulate [3] while the mothers are foraging. Thus, the mothers have to fly tens of kilometers to the foraging sites—fields with thousands of Saguaro cacti [4, 5]. Once at the field, they must compete with many other bats over the same flowering cacti. Several solutions have been suggested for this classical foraging task of exploiting a resource composed of many renewable food sources whose locations are fixed. Some animals randomly visit the food sources [6], and some actively defend a restricted foraging territory [7, 8, 9, 10, 11] or use simple forms of learning, such as “win-stay lose-switch” strategy [12]. Many species have been suggested to follow a trapline, that is, to revisit the food sources in a repeating ordered manner [13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22]. We thus hypothesized that lesser long-nosed bats would visit cacti in a sequenced manner. Using miniature GPS devices, aerial imaging, and video recordings, we tracked the full movement of the bats and all of their visits to their natural food sources. Based on real data and evolutionary simulations, we argue that the bats use a reinforcement learning strategy that requires minimal memory to create small, non-overlapping cacti-cores and exploit nectar efficiently, without social communication.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7575196
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Cell Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75751962020-10-23 Reinforcement Learning Enables Resource Partitioning in Foraging Bats Goldshtein, Aya Handel, Michal Eitan, Ofri Bonstein, Afrine Shaler, Talia Collet, Simon Greif, Stefan Medellín, Rodrigo A. Emek, Yuval Korman, Amos Yovel, Yossi Curr Biol Report Every evening, from late spring to mid-summer, tens of thousands of hungry lactating female lesser long-nosed bats (Leptonycteris yerbabuenae) emerge from their roost and navigate over the Sonoran Desert, seeking for nectar and pollen [1, 2]. The bats roost in a huge maternal colony that is far from the foraging grounds but allows their pups to thermoregulate [3] while the mothers are foraging. Thus, the mothers have to fly tens of kilometers to the foraging sites—fields with thousands of Saguaro cacti [4, 5]. Once at the field, they must compete with many other bats over the same flowering cacti. Several solutions have been suggested for this classical foraging task of exploiting a resource composed of many renewable food sources whose locations are fixed. Some animals randomly visit the food sources [6], and some actively defend a restricted foraging territory [7, 8, 9, 10, 11] or use simple forms of learning, such as “win-stay lose-switch” strategy [12]. Many species have been suggested to follow a trapline, that is, to revisit the food sources in a repeating ordered manner [13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22]. We thus hypothesized that lesser long-nosed bats would visit cacti in a sequenced manner. Using miniature GPS devices, aerial imaging, and video recordings, we tracked the full movement of the bats and all of their visits to their natural food sources. Based on real data and evolutionary simulations, we argue that the bats use a reinforcement learning strategy that requires minimal memory to create small, non-overlapping cacti-cores and exploit nectar efficiently, without social communication. Cell Press 2020-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7575196/ /pubmed/32822610 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2020.07.079 Text en © 2020 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Report
Goldshtein, Aya
Handel, Michal
Eitan, Ofri
Bonstein, Afrine
Shaler, Talia
Collet, Simon
Greif, Stefan
Medellín, Rodrigo A.
Emek, Yuval
Korman, Amos
Yovel, Yossi
Reinforcement Learning Enables Resource Partitioning in Foraging Bats
title Reinforcement Learning Enables Resource Partitioning in Foraging Bats
title_full Reinforcement Learning Enables Resource Partitioning in Foraging Bats
title_fullStr Reinforcement Learning Enables Resource Partitioning in Foraging Bats
title_full_unstemmed Reinforcement Learning Enables Resource Partitioning in Foraging Bats
title_short Reinforcement Learning Enables Resource Partitioning in Foraging Bats
title_sort reinforcement learning enables resource partitioning in foraging bats
topic Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7575196/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32822610
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2020.07.079
work_keys_str_mv AT goldshteinaya reinforcementlearningenablesresourcepartitioninginforagingbats
AT handelmichal reinforcementlearningenablesresourcepartitioninginforagingbats
AT eitanofri reinforcementlearningenablesresourcepartitioninginforagingbats
AT bonsteinafrine reinforcementlearningenablesresourcepartitioninginforagingbats
AT shalertalia reinforcementlearningenablesresourcepartitioninginforagingbats
AT colletsimon reinforcementlearningenablesresourcepartitioninginforagingbats
AT greifstefan reinforcementlearningenablesresourcepartitioninginforagingbats
AT medellinrodrigoa reinforcementlearningenablesresourcepartitioninginforagingbats
AT emekyuval reinforcementlearningenablesresourcepartitioninginforagingbats
AT kormanamos reinforcementlearningenablesresourcepartitioninginforagingbats
AT yovelyossi reinforcementlearningenablesresourcepartitioninginforagingbats