Cargando…

Research response to coronavirus disease 2019 needed better coordination and collaboration: a living mapping of registered trials

OBJECTIVES: Researchers worldwide are actively engaging in research activities to search for preventive and therapeutic interventions against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Our aim was to describe the planning of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in terms of timing related to the course of t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Nguyen, Van Thu, Rivière, Philippe, Ripoll, Pierre, Barnier, Julien, Vuillemot, Romain, Ferrand, Gabriel, Cohen-Boulakia, Sarah, Ravaud, Philippe, Boutron, Isabelle
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. 2021
Materias:	Series
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7575422/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33096223 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.10.010

Ejemplares similares

Toward an observatory of the evolution of clinical trials through phylomemy reconstruction: the COVID-19 vaccines example
por: Lobbé, Quentin, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Outcomes in Registered, Ongoing Randomized Controlled Trials of Patient Education
por: Pino, Cécile, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Public availability of results of observational studies evaluating an intervention registered at ClinicalTrials.gov
por: Baudart, Marie, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Levels of Evidence Supporting United States Guidelines in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Treatment
por: Pellat, Anna, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Exclusion of patients with concomitant chronic conditions in ongoing randomised controlled trials targeting 10 common chronic conditions and registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: a systematic review of registration details
por: Buffel du Vaure, Céline, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Inadequate description of educational interventions in ongoing randomized controlled trials
por: Pino, Cécile, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Availability of results of interventional studies assessing colorectal cancer from 2013 to 2020
por: Pellat, Anna, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Assessment of transparency and selective reporting of interventional trials studying colorectal cancer
por: Pellat, Anna, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Availability of Results of Trials Studying Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma over the Past 10 Years
por: Pellat, Anna, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Patients’ Perspectives on Transforming Clinical Trial Participation: Large Online Vignette-based Survey
por: Nguyen, Van Thu, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Overcoming Barriers to Mobilizing Collective Intelligence in Research: Qualitative Study of Researchers With Experience of Collective Intelligence
por: Nguyen, Van Thu, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Risk of bias in observational studies using routinely collected data of comparative effectiveness research: a meta-research study
por: Nguyen, Van Thu, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Effect of editors’ implementation of CONSORT guidelines on the reporting of abstracts in high impact medical journals: interrupted time series analysis
por: Hopewell, Sally, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

ASSIST Applicability Scoring of Surgical trials. An Investigator-reported aSsessment Tool
por: Tourabaly, Idriss, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Reporting of analyses from randomized controlled trials with multiple arms: a systematic review
por: Baron, Gabriel, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Influence of trial sample size on treatment effect estimates: meta-epidemiological study
por: Dechartres, Agnes, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Impact of sending email reminders of the legal requirement for posting results on ClinicalTrials.gov: cohort embedded pragmatic randomized controlled trial
por: Maruani, Annabel, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Comparison of Treatment Effect Estimates for Pharmacological Randomized Controlled Trials Enrolling Older Adults Only and Those including Adults: A Meta-Epidemiological Study
por: Seegers, Valérie, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Classification and prevalence of spin in abstracts of non-randomized studies evaluating an intervention
por: Lazarus, Clément, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Designs of trials assessing interventions to improve the peer review process: a vignette-based survey
por: Heim, Amytis, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

The research burden of randomized controlled trial participation: a systematic thematic synthesis of qualitative evidence
por: Naidoo, Nivantha, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

The VEPRO trial: A cross-over randomised controlled trial comparing 2 progressive lenses for patients with presbyopia
por: Boutron, Isabelle, et al.
Publicado: (2008)

Reporting of harm in randomized controlled trials evaluating stents for percutaneous coronary intervention
por: Ethgen, Morgane, et al.
Publicado: (2009)

Incorporation of assessments of risk of bias of primary studies in systematic reviews of randomised trials: a cross-sectional study
por: Hopewell, Sally, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Dissemination of 2014 dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) trial results: a systematic review of scholarly and media attention over 7 months
por: Sharp, Melissa K, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Use of Trial Register Information during the Peer Review Process
por: Mathieu, Sylvain, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Applicability and generalisability of the results of systematic reviews to public health practice and policy: a systematic review
por: Ahmad, Nizar, et al.
Publicado: (2010)

Geographical Representativeness of Published and Ongoing Randomized Controlled Trials. The Example of: Tobacco Consumption and HIV Infection
por: Ahmad, Nizar, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Reporting funding source or conflict of interest in abstracts of randomized controlled trials, no evidence of a large impact on general practitioners’ confidence in conclusions, a three-arm randomized controlled trial
por: du Vaure, Céline Buffel, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

The most important tasks for peer reviewers evaluating a randomized controlled trial are not congruent with the tasks most often requested by journal editors
por: Chauvin, Anthony, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Impact of adding a limitations section to abstracts of systematic reviews on readers’ interpretation: a randomized controlled trial
por: Yavchitz, Amélie, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Interpretation of Results of Studies Evaluating an Intervention Highlighted in Google Health News: A Cross-Sectional Study of News
por: Haneef, Romana, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Factors associated with online media attention to research: a cohort study of articles evaluating cancer treatments
por: Haneef, Romana, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Correction to: Avoidable waste related to inadequate methods and incomplete reporting of interventions: a systematic review of randomized trials performed in Sub-Saharan Africa
por: Ndounga Diakou, Lee Aymar, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Impact of searching clinical trial registries in systematic reviews of pharmaceutical treatments: methodological systematic review and reanalysis of meta-analyses
por: Baudard, Marie, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Avoidable waste related to inadequate methods and incomplete reporting of interventions: a systematic review of randomized trials performed in Sub-Saharan Africa
por: Ndounga Diakou, Lee Aymar, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Association between trial registration and treatment effect estimates: a meta-epidemiological study
por: Dechartres, Agnès, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Impact of interventions to improve the quality of peer review of biomedical journals: a systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Bruce, Rachel, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Changes in evidence for studies assessing interventions for COVID-19 reported in preprints: meta-research study
por: Oikonomidi, Theodora, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Transparency and reporting characteristics of COVID-19 randomized controlled trials
por: Kapp, Philipp, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_bphgehouem5fd0n1h0dlv7b7v2