Cargando…

Functional input and membership characteristics in the accuracy of machine learning approach for estimation of multiphase flow

In the current study, Artificial Intelligence (AI) approach was used for the learning of a physical system. We applied four inputs and one output in the learning process of AI. In the learning process, the inputs are space locations of a BCR (bubble column reactor), which are x, y, and z coordinate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Babanezhad, Meisam, Taghvaie Nakhjiri, Ali, Rezakazemi, Mashallah, Marjani, Azam, Shirazian, Saeed
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7575550/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33082441
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-74858-4
_version_ 1783597830417416192
author Babanezhad, Meisam
Taghvaie Nakhjiri, Ali
Rezakazemi, Mashallah
Marjani, Azam
Shirazian, Saeed
author_facet Babanezhad, Meisam
Taghvaie Nakhjiri, Ali
Rezakazemi, Mashallah
Marjani, Azam
Shirazian, Saeed
author_sort Babanezhad, Meisam
collection PubMed
description In the current study, Artificial Intelligence (AI) approach was used for the learning of a physical system. We applied four inputs and one output in the learning process of AI. In the learning process, the inputs are space locations of a BCR (bubble column reactor), which are x, y, and z coordinate as well as the amount of gas fraction in BCR. The liquid velocity is also considered as output. A variety of functions were used in learning, such as gbellmf and gaussmf functions, to examine which functions can give the best learning. At the end of the study, all of the results were compared to CFD (computational fluid dynamics). A three-dimensional (3D) BCR was used in this research, and we studied simulation by CFD as well as AI. The data from CFD in a 3D BCR was studied in the AI domain. In AI, we tuned for various parameters to achieve the best intelligence in the system. For instance, different inputs, different membership functions, different numbers of membership functions were used in the learning process. Moreover, the meshless prediction was used, meaning that some data in the BCR have not participated in the learning, and they were predicted in the prediction process, which gives us a special capability to compare the results with the CFD outcomes. The findings showed us that AI can predict the CFD results, and a great agreement was achieved between CFD computing nodes and AI elements. This novel methodology can suggest a meshless and multifunctional AI model to simulate the turbulence flow in the BCR. For further evaluation, the ANFIS method is compared with ACOFIS and PSOFIS methods with regards to model’s accuracy. The results show that ANFIS method contains higher accuracy and prediction capability compared with ACOFIS and PSOFIS methods.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7575550
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75755502020-10-21 Functional input and membership characteristics in the accuracy of machine learning approach for estimation of multiphase flow Babanezhad, Meisam Taghvaie Nakhjiri, Ali Rezakazemi, Mashallah Marjani, Azam Shirazian, Saeed Sci Rep Article In the current study, Artificial Intelligence (AI) approach was used for the learning of a physical system. We applied four inputs and one output in the learning process of AI. In the learning process, the inputs are space locations of a BCR (bubble column reactor), which are x, y, and z coordinate as well as the amount of gas fraction in BCR. The liquid velocity is also considered as output. A variety of functions were used in learning, such as gbellmf and gaussmf functions, to examine which functions can give the best learning. At the end of the study, all of the results were compared to CFD (computational fluid dynamics). A three-dimensional (3D) BCR was used in this research, and we studied simulation by CFD as well as AI. The data from CFD in a 3D BCR was studied in the AI domain. In AI, we tuned for various parameters to achieve the best intelligence in the system. For instance, different inputs, different membership functions, different numbers of membership functions were used in the learning process. Moreover, the meshless prediction was used, meaning that some data in the BCR have not participated in the learning, and they were predicted in the prediction process, which gives us a special capability to compare the results with the CFD outcomes. The findings showed us that AI can predict the CFD results, and a great agreement was achieved between CFD computing nodes and AI elements. This novel methodology can suggest a meshless and multifunctional AI model to simulate the turbulence flow in the BCR. For further evaluation, the ANFIS method is compared with ACOFIS and PSOFIS methods with regards to model’s accuracy. The results show that ANFIS method contains higher accuracy and prediction capability compared with ACOFIS and PSOFIS methods. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7575550/ /pubmed/33082441 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-74858-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Babanezhad, Meisam
Taghvaie Nakhjiri, Ali
Rezakazemi, Mashallah
Marjani, Azam
Shirazian, Saeed
Functional input and membership characteristics in the accuracy of machine learning approach for estimation of multiphase flow
title Functional input and membership characteristics in the accuracy of machine learning approach for estimation of multiphase flow
title_full Functional input and membership characteristics in the accuracy of machine learning approach for estimation of multiphase flow
title_fullStr Functional input and membership characteristics in the accuracy of machine learning approach for estimation of multiphase flow
title_full_unstemmed Functional input and membership characteristics in the accuracy of machine learning approach for estimation of multiphase flow
title_short Functional input and membership characteristics in the accuracy of machine learning approach for estimation of multiphase flow
title_sort functional input and membership characteristics in the accuracy of machine learning approach for estimation of multiphase flow
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7575550/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33082441
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-74858-4
work_keys_str_mv AT babanezhadmeisam functionalinputandmembershipcharacteristicsintheaccuracyofmachinelearningapproachforestimationofmultiphaseflow
AT taghvaienakhjiriali functionalinputandmembershipcharacteristicsintheaccuracyofmachinelearningapproachforestimationofmultiphaseflow
AT rezakazemimashallah functionalinputandmembershipcharacteristicsintheaccuracyofmachinelearningapproachforestimationofmultiphaseflow
AT marjaniazam functionalinputandmembershipcharacteristicsintheaccuracyofmachinelearningapproachforestimationofmultiphaseflow
AT shiraziansaeed functionalinputandmembershipcharacteristicsintheaccuracyofmachinelearningapproachforestimationofmultiphaseflow