Cargando…

Social distancing as a critical test of the micro-sociology of solidarity

Face-to-face (F2F) embodied interaction is the initial ingredient of interaction ritual (IR), the buildup of shared emotion, mutual focus of attention, and rhythmic entrainment that produces interpersonal solidarity. What happens when a natural experiment (the COVID-19 epidemic) prevents most F2F en...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Collins, Randall
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Palgrave Macmillan UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7575701/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33101676
http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s41290-020-00120-z
_version_ 1783597858062073856
author Collins, Randall
author_facet Collins, Randall
author_sort Collins, Randall
collection PubMed
description Face-to-face (F2F) embodied interaction is the initial ingredient of interaction ritual (IR), the buildup of shared emotion, mutual focus of attention, and rhythmic entrainment that produces interpersonal solidarity. What happens when a natural experiment (the COVID-19 epidemic) prevents most F2F encounters or limits the modes of micro-interactional communication by masking? The paper examines evidence of the effects of masking and social distancing on public behavior, family life, remote schooling and remote work, prohibition of large audiences and assemblies, and attempts to substitute non-embodied electronic media. Most effects are consistent with IR theory predictions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7575701
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Palgrave Macmillan UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75757012020-10-21 Social distancing as a critical test of the micro-sociology of solidarity Collins, Randall Am J Cult Sociol Original Article Face-to-face (F2F) embodied interaction is the initial ingredient of interaction ritual (IR), the buildup of shared emotion, mutual focus of attention, and rhythmic entrainment that produces interpersonal solidarity. What happens when a natural experiment (the COVID-19 epidemic) prevents most F2F encounters or limits the modes of micro-interactional communication by masking? The paper examines evidence of the effects of masking and social distancing on public behavior, family life, remote schooling and remote work, prohibition of large audiences and assemblies, and attempts to substitute non-embodied electronic media. Most effects are consistent with IR theory predictions. Palgrave Macmillan UK 2020-10-21 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7575701/ /pubmed/33101676 http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s41290-020-00120-z Text en © Springer Nature Limited 2020 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Original Article
Collins, Randall
Social distancing as a critical test of the micro-sociology of solidarity
title Social distancing as a critical test of the micro-sociology of solidarity
title_full Social distancing as a critical test of the micro-sociology of solidarity
title_fullStr Social distancing as a critical test of the micro-sociology of solidarity
title_full_unstemmed Social distancing as a critical test of the micro-sociology of solidarity
title_short Social distancing as a critical test of the micro-sociology of solidarity
title_sort social distancing as a critical test of the micro-sociology of solidarity
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7575701/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33101676
http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s41290-020-00120-z
work_keys_str_mv AT collinsrandall socialdistancingasacriticaltestofthemicrosociologyofsolidarity