Cargando…

Equal opportunity for all? An analysis of race and ethnicity in fertility preservation in New York City

PURPOSE: To compare the racial and ethnic make-up of patients who accessed medically indicated fertility preservation services (MIFP) against the overall racial diversity (including Hispanic origin) across women of reproductive age diagnosed with cancer in New York City (NYC). METHODS: All patients...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Voigt, Paxton E., Blakemore, Jennifer K., McCulloh, David, Fino, M. Elizabeth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7576106/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33085025
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10815-020-01980-7
_version_ 1783597948813180928
author Voigt, Paxton E.
Blakemore, Jennifer K.
McCulloh, David
Fino, M. Elizabeth
author_facet Voigt, Paxton E.
Blakemore, Jennifer K.
McCulloh, David
Fino, M. Elizabeth
author_sort Voigt, Paxton E.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To compare the racial and ethnic make-up of patients who accessed medically indicated fertility preservation services (MIFP) against the overall racial diversity (including Hispanic origin) across women of reproductive age diagnosed with cancer in New York City (NYC). METHODS: All patients who completed at least one MIFP between January 2017 and December 2018 were reviewed. Race was self-reported. A calculation of the expected racial distribution across women of reproductive age with cancer in NYC was determined using the most recent NYC census data. Statistical analysis included chi-square goodness of fit and test for independence and Kruskal-Wallis H test, with p < 0.05 considered significant. RESULTS: A total of 107 patients who accessed MIFP were included. A total of 55 (51.4%) identified as White, 3 (2.8%) as Black, 13 (12.2%) as Asian, 6 (5.6%) as Hispanic, 3 (2.8%) as other, and 27 (25.2%) did not report. A total of 78.5% of patients had insurance. There was no significant difference in racial distribution by cancer type (p = 0.255). A subgroup analysis excluding the BRCA+ patients and races not reported by the census (n = 69) was then performed, showing a statistically significant difference between observed (O) and expected (E) cases of fertility preservation (FP) by race at our center—White 47O/32E, Black 3O/15E, Asian 13O/7E, and Hispanic 6O/15E (p < 0.001). A statistically significant difference in racial distribution by FP type was observed. CONCLUSIONS: There is a difference in the observed vs expected racial distribution of patients accessing MIFP. Further studies are needed to identify modifiable factors to better ensure equal opportunity to all patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7576106
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75761062020-10-21 Equal opportunity for all? An analysis of race and ethnicity in fertility preservation in New York City Voigt, Paxton E. Blakemore, Jennifer K. McCulloh, David Fino, M. Elizabeth J Assist Reprod Genet Fertility Preservation PURPOSE: To compare the racial and ethnic make-up of patients who accessed medically indicated fertility preservation services (MIFP) against the overall racial diversity (including Hispanic origin) across women of reproductive age diagnosed with cancer in New York City (NYC). METHODS: All patients who completed at least one MIFP between January 2017 and December 2018 were reviewed. Race was self-reported. A calculation of the expected racial distribution across women of reproductive age with cancer in NYC was determined using the most recent NYC census data. Statistical analysis included chi-square goodness of fit and test for independence and Kruskal-Wallis H test, with p < 0.05 considered significant. RESULTS: A total of 107 patients who accessed MIFP were included. A total of 55 (51.4%) identified as White, 3 (2.8%) as Black, 13 (12.2%) as Asian, 6 (5.6%) as Hispanic, 3 (2.8%) as other, and 27 (25.2%) did not report. A total of 78.5% of patients had insurance. There was no significant difference in racial distribution by cancer type (p = 0.255). A subgroup analysis excluding the BRCA+ patients and races not reported by the census (n = 69) was then performed, showing a statistically significant difference between observed (O) and expected (E) cases of fertility preservation (FP) by race at our center—White 47O/32E, Black 3O/15E, Asian 13O/7E, and Hispanic 6O/15E (p < 0.001). A statistically significant difference in racial distribution by FP type was observed. CONCLUSIONS: There is a difference in the observed vs expected racial distribution of patients accessing MIFP. Further studies are needed to identify modifiable factors to better ensure equal opportunity to all patients. Springer US 2020-10-21 2020-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7576106/ /pubmed/33085025 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10815-020-01980-7 Text en © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020
spellingShingle Fertility Preservation
Voigt, Paxton E.
Blakemore, Jennifer K.
McCulloh, David
Fino, M. Elizabeth
Equal opportunity for all? An analysis of race and ethnicity in fertility preservation in New York City
title Equal opportunity for all? An analysis of race and ethnicity in fertility preservation in New York City
title_full Equal opportunity for all? An analysis of race and ethnicity in fertility preservation in New York City
title_fullStr Equal opportunity for all? An analysis of race and ethnicity in fertility preservation in New York City
title_full_unstemmed Equal opportunity for all? An analysis of race and ethnicity in fertility preservation in New York City
title_short Equal opportunity for all? An analysis of race and ethnicity in fertility preservation in New York City
title_sort equal opportunity for all? an analysis of race and ethnicity in fertility preservation in new york city
topic Fertility Preservation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7576106/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33085025
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10815-020-01980-7
work_keys_str_mv AT voigtpaxtone equalopportunityforallananalysisofraceandethnicityinfertilitypreservationinnewyorkcity
AT blakemorejenniferk equalopportunityforallananalysisofraceandethnicityinfertilitypreservationinnewyorkcity
AT mccullohdavid equalopportunityforallananalysisofraceandethnicityinfertilitypreservationinnewyorkcity
AT finomelizabeth equalopportunityforallananalysisofraceandethnicityinfertilitypreservationinnewyorkcity