Cargando…

Dynamic differences between DNA damage repair responses in primary tumors and cell lines

The study of DNA damage repair response (DDR) in prostate cancer is restricted by the limited number of prostate cancer cell lines and lack of surrogates for heterogeneity in clinical samples. Here, we sought to leverage our experience with patient derived explants (PDEs) cultured ex vivo to study d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gilbreath, Collin, Ma, Shihong, Yu, Lan, Sonavane, Rajni, Roggero, Carlos M., Devineni, Anvita, Mauck, Ryan, Desai, Neil B., Bagrodia, Aditya, Kittler, Ralf, Raj, Ganesh V., Yin, Yi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Neoplasia Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7576517/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33096336
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tranon.2020.100898
_version_ 1783598030586380288
author Gilbreath, Collin
Ma, Shihong
Yu, Lan
Sonavane, Rajni
Roggero, Carlos M.
Devineni, Anvita
Mauck, Ryan
Desai, Neil B.
Bagrodia, Aditya
Kittler, Ralf
Raj, Ganesh V.
Yin, Yi
author_facet Gilbreath, Collin
Ma, Shihong
Yu, Lan
Sonavane, Rajni
Roggero, Carlos M.
Devineni, Anvita
Mauck, Ryan
Desai, Neil B.
Bagrodia, Aditya
Kittler, Ralf
Raj, Ganesh V.
Yin, Yi
author_sort Gilbreath, Collin
collection PubMed
description The study of DNA damage repair response (DDR) in prostate cancer is restricted by the limited number of prostate cancer cell lines and lack of surrogates for heterogeneity in clinical samples. Here, we sought to leverage our experience with patient derived explants (PDEs) cultured ex vivo to study dynamics of DDR in primary tumors following application of clinically relevant doses of ionizing radiation (IR) to tumor cells in their native 3-dimensional microenvironment. We compared DDR dynamics between prostate cancer cell lines, PDEs and xenograft derived explants (XDEs) following treatment with IR (2Gy) either alone or in combination with pharmacological modulators of DDR. We have shown that following treatment with 2Gy, DDR can be consistently detected in PDEs from multiple solid tumors, including prostate, kidney, testes, lung and breast, as evidenced by γ-H2AX, 53BP1, phospho-ATM and phospho-DNA-PKcs foci. By examining kinetics of resolution of IR-induced foci, we have shown that DDR in prostate PDEs (complete resolution in 8 h) is much faster than in prostate cancer cell lines (<50% resolution in 8 h). The transcriptional profile of DDR genes following 2Gy IR appears to be distinct between PDEs and cell lines. Pre-treatment with drugs targeting DDR pathways differentially alter the kinetics of DDR in the PDEs and cell lines, as evidenced by altered kinetics of foci resolution. This study highlights the utility of PDEs as a robust model system for short-term evaluation of DDR in primary solid tumors in clinically relevant microenvironment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7576517
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Neoplasia Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75765172020-10-30 Dynamic differences between DNA damage repair responses in primary tumors and cell lines Gilbreath, Collin Ma, Shihong Yu, Lan Sonavane, Rajni Roggero, Carlos M. Devineni, Anvita Mauck, Ryan Desai, Neil B. Bagrodia, Aditya Kittler, Ralf Raj, Ganesh V. Yin, Yi Transl Oncol Original Research The study of DNA damage repair response (DDR) in prostate cancer is restricted by the limited number of prostate cancer cell lines and lack of surrogates for heterogeneity in clinical samples. Here, we sought to leverage our experience with patient derived explants (PDEs) cultured ex vivo to study dynamics of DDR in primary tumors following application of clinically relevant doses of ionizing radiation (IR) to tumor cells in their native 3-dimensional microenvironment. We compared DDR dynamics between prostate cancer cell lines, PDEs and xenograft derived explants (XDEs) following treatment with IR (2Gy) either alone or in combination with pharmacological modulators of DDR. We have shown that following treatment with 2Gy, DDR can be consistently detected in PDEs from multiple solid tumors, including prostate, kidney, testes, lung and breast, as evidenced by γ-H2AX, 53BP1, phospho-ATM and phospho-DNA-PKcs foci. By examining kinetics of resolution of IR-induced foci, we have shown that DDR in prostate PDEs (complete resolution in 8 h) is much faster than in prostate cancer cell lines (<50% resolution in 8 h). The transcriptional profile of DDR genes following 2Gy IR appears to be distinct between PDEs and cell lines. Pre-treatment with drugs targeting DDR pathways differentially alter the kinetics of DDR in the PDEs and cell lines, as evidenced by altered kinetics of foci resolution. This study highlights the utility of PDEs as a robust model system for short-term evaluation of DDR in primary solid tumors in clinically relevant microenvironment. Neoplasia Press 2020-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7576517/ /pubmed/33096336 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tranon.2020.100898 Text en © 2020 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research
Gilbreath, Collin
Ma, Shihong
Yu, Lan
Sonavane, Rajni
Roggero, Carlos M.
Devineni, Anvita
Mauck, Ryan
Desai, Neil B.
Bagrodia, Aditya
Kittler, Ralf
Raj, Ganesh V.
Yin, Yi
Dynamic differences between DNA damage repair responses in primary tumors and cell lines
title Dynamic differences between DNA damage repair responses in primary tumors and cell lines
title_full Dynamic differences between DNA damage repair responses in primary tumors and cell lines
title_fullStr Dynamic differences between DNA damage repair responses in primary tumors and cell lines
title_full_unstemmed Dynamic differences between DNA damage repair responses in primary tumors and cell lines
title_short Dynamic differences between DNA damage repair responses in primary tumors and cell lines
title_sort dynamic differences between dna damage repair responses in primary tumors and cell lines
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7576517/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33096336
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tranon.2020.100898
work_keys_str_mv AT gilbreathcollin dynamicdifferencesbetweendnadamagerepairresponsesinprimarytumorsandcelllines
AT mashihong dynamicdifferencesbetweendnadamagerepairresponsesinprimarytumorsandcelllines
AT yulan dynamicdifferencesbetweendnadamagerepairresponsesinprimarytumorsandcelllines
AT sonavanerajni dynamicdifferencesbetweendnadamagerepairresponsesinprimarytumorsandcelllines
AT roggerocarlosm dynamicdifferencesbetweendnadamagerepairresponsesinprimarytumorsandcelllines
AT devinenianvita dynamicdifferencesbetweendnadamagerepairresponsesinprimarytumorsandcelllines
AT mauckryan dynamicdifferencesbetweendnadamagerepairresponsesinprimarytumorsandcelllines
AT desaineilb dynamicdifferencesbetweendnadamagerepairresponsesinprimarytumorsandcelllines
AT bagrodiaaditya dynamicdifferencesbetweendnadamagerepairresponsesinprimarytumorsandcelllines
AT kittlerralf dynamicdifferencesbetweendnadamagerepairresponsesinprimarytumorsandcelllines
AT rajganeshv dynamicdifferencesbetweendnadamagerepairresponsesinprimarytumorsandcelllines
AT yinyi dynamicdifferencesbetweendnadamagerepairresponsesinprimarytumorsandcelllines