Cargando…

A randomised test of the effect of medical v. lay idiom on assessment of perceived mental health condition in the USA

AIMS: To test the impact of using different idioms in epidemiological interviews on the prevalence and correlates of poor mental health and mental health service use. METHODS: We conducted a randomised methodological experiment in a nationally representative sample of the US adult population, compar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Breslau, J., McBain, R., Wong, E. C., Roth, E., Burnam, M. A., Cefalu, M. S., Collins, R. L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7576519/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33028455
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S2045796020000840
_version_ 1783598031038316544
author Breslau, J.
McBain, R.
Wong, E. C.
Roth, E.
Burnam, M. A.
Cefalu, M. S.
Collins, R. L.
author_facet Breslau, J.
McBain, R.
Wong, E. C.
Roth, E.
Burnam, M. A.
Cefalu, M. S.
Collins, R. L.
author_sort Breslau, J.
collection PubMed
description AIMS: To test the impact of using different idioms in epidemiological interviews on the prevalence and correlates of poor mental health and mental health service use. METHODS: We conducted a randomised methodological experiment in a nationally representative sample of the US adult population, comparing a lay idiom, which asked about ‘problems with your emotions or nerves’ with a more medical idiom, which asked about ‘problems with your mental health’. Differences across study arms in the associations of endorsement of problems with the Kessler-6 (a validated assessment of psychological distress), demographic characteristics, self-rated health and mental health service use were examined. RESULTS: Respondents were about half as likely to endorse a problem when asked with the more medical idiom (18.1%) than when asked with the lay idiom (35.1%). The medical idiom had a significantly larger area under the ROC curve when compared against a validated measure of psychological distress than the lay idiom (0.91 v. 0.87, p = 0.012). The proportion of the population who endorsed a problem but did not receive treatment in the past year was less than half as large for the medical idiom (7.90%) than for the lay idiom (20.94%). Endorsement of problems differed in its associations with age, sex, race/ethnicity and self-rated health depending on the question idiom. For instance, the odds of endorsing problems were threefold higher in the youngest than the oldest age group when the medical idiom was used (OR = 3.07; 95% CI 1.47–6.41) but did not differ across age groups when the lay idiom was used (OR = 0.76; 95% CI 0.43–1.36). CONCLUSION: Choice of idiom in epidemiological questionnaires can affect the apparent correlates of poor mental health and service use. Cultural change within populations over time may require changes in instrument wording to maintain consistency in epidemiological measurement of psychiatric conditions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7576519
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75765192020-10-28 A randomised test of the effect of medical v. lay idiom on assessment of perceived mental health condition in the USA Breslau, J. McBain, R. Wong, E. C. Roth, E. Burnam, M. A. Cefalu, M. S. Collins, R. L. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci Original Article AIMS: To test the impact of using different idioms in epidemiological interviews on the prevalence and correlates of poor mental health and mental health service use. METHODS: We conducted a randomised methodological experiment in a nationally representative sample of the US adult population, comparing a lay idiom, which asked about ‘problems with your emotions or nerves’ with a more medical idiom, which asked about ‘problems with your mental health’. Differences across study arms in the associations of endorsement of problems with the Kessler-6 (a validated assessment of psychological distress), demographic characteristics, self-rated health and mental health service use were examined. RESULTS: Respondents were about half as likely to endorse a problem when asked with the more medical idiom (18.1%) than when asked with the lay idiom (35.1%). The medical idiom had a significantly larger area under the ROC curve when compared against a validated measure of psychological distress than the lay idiom (0.91 v. 0.87, p = 0.012). The proportion of the population who endorsed a problem but did not receive treatment in the past year was less than half as large for the medical idiom (7.90%) than for the lay idiom (20.94%). Endorsement of problems differed in its associations with age, sex, race/ethnicity and self-rated health depending on the question idiom. For instance, the odds of endorsing problems were threefold higher in the youngest than the oldest age group when the medical idiom was used (OR = 3.07; 95% CI 1.47–6.41) but did not differ across age groups when the lay idiom was used (OR = 0.76; 95% CI 0.43–1.36). CONCLUSION: Choice of idiom in epidemiological questionnaires can affect the apparent correlates of poor mental health and service use. Cultural change within populations over time may require changes in instrument wording to maintain consistency in epidemiological measurement of psychiatric conditions. Cambridge University Press 2020-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7576519/ /pubmed/33028455 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S2045796020000840 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
spellingShingle Original Article
Breslau, J.
McBain, R.
Wong, E. C.
Roth, E.
Burnam, M. A.
Cefalu, M. S.
Collins, R. L.
A randomised test of the effect of medical v. lay idiom on assessment of perceived mental health condition in the USA
title A randomised test of the effect of medical v. lay idiom on assessment of perceived mental health condition in the USA
title_full A randomised test of the effect of medical v. lay idiom on assessment of perceived mental health condition in the USA
title_fullStr A randomised test of the effect of medical v. lay idiom on assessment of perceived mental health condition in the USA
title_full_unstemmed A randomised test of the effect of medical v. lay idiom on assessment of perceived mental health condition in the USA
title_short A randomised test of the effect of medical v. lay idiom on assessment of perceived mental health condition in the USA
title_sort randomised test of the effect of medical v. lay idiom on assessment of perceived mental health condition in the usa
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7576519/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33028455
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S2045796020000840
work_keys_str_mv AT breslauj arandomisedtestoftheeffectofmedicalvlayidiomonassessmentofperceivedmentalhealthconditionintheusa
AT mcbainr arandomisedtestoftheeffectofmedicalvlayidiomonassessmentofperceivedmentalhealthconditionintheusa
AT wongec arandomisedtestoftheeffectofmedicalvlayidiomonassessmentofperceivedmentalhealthconditionintheusa
AT rothe arandomisedtestoftheeffectofmedicalvlayidiomonassessmentofperceivedmentalhealthconditionintheusa
AT burnamma arandomisedtestoftheeffectofmedicalvlayidiomonassessmentofperceivedmentalhealthconditionintheusa
AT cefalums arandomisedtestoftheeffectofmedicalvlayidiomonassessmentofperceivedmentalhealthconditionintheusa
AT collinsrl arandomisedtestoftheeffectofmedicalvlayidiomonassessmentofperceivedmentalhealthconditionintheusa
AT breslauj randomisedtestoftheeffectofmedicalvlayidiomonassessmentofperceivedmentalhealthconditionintheusa
AT mcbainr randomisedtestoftheeffectofmedicalvlayidiomonassessmentofperceivedmentalhealthconditionintheusa
AT wongec randomisedtestoftheeffectofmedicalvlayidiomonassessmentofperceivedmentalhealthconditionintheusa
AT rothe randomisedtestoftheeffectofmedicalvlayidiomonassessmentofperceivedmentalhealthconditionintheusa
AT burnamma randomisedtestoftheeffectofmedicalvlayidiomonassessmentofperceivedmentalhealthconditionintheusa
AT cefalums randomisedtestoftheeffectofmedicalvlayidiomonassessmentofperceivedmentalhealthconditionintheusa
AT collinsrl randomisedtestoftheeffectofmedicalvlayidiomonassessmentofperceivedmentalhealthconditionintheusa