Cargando…
Towards an understanding of GPs’ viewpoint on diagnosing postnatal depression in general practice: a small-scale realist evaluation
BACKGROUND: Less than half of postnatal depression cases are identified in routine clinical assessment. Guidelines and current literature suggest that general practitioners (GPs) may have an opportunistic role in detecting postnatal depression due to their early contact and existing rapport with man...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7576521/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33032675 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1463423620000316 |
_version_ | 1783598031524855808 |
---|---|
author | Sriranjan, Ashvanthi Nadira Abrams, Ruth Wong, Geoff Park, Sophie |
author_facet | Sriranjan, Ashvanthi Nadira Abrams, Ruth Wong, Geoff Park, Sophie |
author_sort | Sriranjan, Ashvanthi Nadira |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Less than half of postnatal depression cases are identified in routine clinical assessment. Guidelines and current literature suggest that general practitioners (GPs) may have an opportunistic role in detecting postnatal depression due to their early contact and existing rapport with many new mothers. There is limited research on the diagnostic approaches chosen by GPs in different GP−patient contexts. Our small-scale study evaluates the thought processes of seven GPs based in one practice when forming a clinical diagnosis of postnatal depression under different contexts. METHODS: Seven GP participants were interviewed using case vignettes about postnatal depression, based on an adapted Johari’s window framework. A realist approach to analysis was undertaken with the intention of understanding GPs’ responses to different situations. Context−mechanism−outcome configurations were constructed, and a programme theory was formed to consolidate the findings. FINDINGS: Findings suggest that diagnoses may be a clinician-led or collaborative process between GP and patient. In collaborative contexts, stigmatising views were addressed by GPs, time for self-reflection was encouraged and mothers’ views were accounted for. Clinician-led diagnoses often occurred in contexts where there was a lack of acknowledgement of symptoms on behalf of the patient or where safety was a concern. The personal and clinical experience of GPs themselves, as well as effective communication channels with other primary care professionals, was significant mechanisms. CONCLUSION: GPs use a variety of strategies to support patient disclosure and acceptance of their condition. The complexity of GP−patient contexts may influence the clinical thought process. We address some of the gaps in existing literature by exploring postnatal depression diagnosis in primary care and provide tentative explanations to suggest what works, for whom and in what contexts. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7576521 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75765212020-10-29 Towards an understanding of GPs’ viewpoint on diagnosing postnatal depression in general practice: a small-scale realist evaluation Sriranjan, Ashvanthi Nadira Abrams, Ruth Wong, Geoff Park, Sophie Prim Health Care Res Dev Research BACKGROUND: Less than half of postnatal depression cases are identified in routine clinical assessment. Guidelines and current literature suggest that general practitioners (GPs) may have an opportunistic role in detecting postnatal depression due to their early contact and existing rapport with many new mothers. There is limited research on the diagnostic approaches chosen by GPs in different GP−patient contexts. Our small-scale study evaluates the thought processes of seven GPs based in one practice when forming a clinical diagnosis of postnatal depression under different contexts. METHODS: Seven GP participants were interviewed using case vignettes about postnatal depression, based on an adapted Johari’s window framework. A realist approach to analysis was undertaken with the intention of understanding GPs’ responses to different situations. Context−mechanism−outcome configurations were constructed, and a programme theory was formed to consolidate the findings. FINDINGS: Findings suggest that diagnoses may be a clinician-led or collaborative process between GP and patient. In collaborative contexts, stigmatising views were addressed by GPs, time for self-reflection was encouraged and mothers’ views were accounted for. Clinician-led diagnoses often occurred in contexts where there was a lack of acknowledgement of symptoms on behalf of the patient or where safety was a concern. The personal and clinical experience of GPs themselves, as well as effective communication channels with other primary care professionals, was significant mechanisms. CONCLUSION: GPs use a variety of strategies to support patient disclosure and acceptance of their condition. The complexity of GP−patient contexts may influence the clinical thought process. We address some of the gaps in existing literature by exploring postnatal depression diagnosis in primary care and provide tentative explanations to suggest what works, for whom and in what contexts. Cambridge University Press 2020-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7576521/ /pubmed/33032675 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1463423620000316 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Sriranjan, Ashvanthi Nadira Abrams, Ruth Wong, Geoff Park, Sophie Towards an understanding of GPs’ viewpoint on diagnosing postnatal depression in general practice: a small-scale realist evaluation |
title | Towards an understanding of GPs’ viewpoint on diagnosing postnatal depression in general practice: a small-scale realist evaluation |
title_full | Towards an understanding of GPs’ viewpoint on diagnosing postnatal depression in general practice: a small-scale realist evaluation |
title_fullStr | Towards an understanding of GPs’ viewpoint on diagnosing postnatal depression in general practice: a small-scale realist evaluation |
title_full_unstemmed | Towards an understanding of GPs’ viewpoint on diagnosing postnatal depression in general practice: a small-scale realist evaluation |
title_short | Towards an understanding of GPs’ viewpoint on diagnosing postnatal depression in general practice: a small-scale realist evaluation |
title_sort | towards an understanding of gps’ viewpoint on diagnosing postnatal depression in general practice: a small-scale realist evaluation |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7576521/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33032675 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1463423620000316 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sriranjanashvanthinadira towardsanunderstandingofgpsviewpointondiagnosingpostnataldepressioningeneralpracticeasmallscalerealistevaluation AT abramsruth towardsanunderstandingofgpsviewpointondiagnosingpostnataldepressioningeneralpracticeasmallscalerealistevaluation AT wonggeoff towardsanunderstandingofgpsviewpointondiagnosingpostnataldepressioningeneralpracticeasmallscalerealistevaluation AT parksophie towardsanunderstandingofgpsviewpointondiagnosingpostnataldepressioningeneralpracticeasmallscalerealistevaluation |