Cargando…

External validation of the detection of indicators and vulnerabilities for emergency room trips (DIVERT) scale: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: The Detection of Indicators and Vulnerabilities of Emergency Room Trips (DIVERT) scale was developed to classify and estimate the risk of emergency department (ED) use among home care clients. The objective of this study was to externally validate the DIVERT scale in a secondary populati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mowbray, Fabrice I., Jones, Aaron, Schumacher, Connie, Hirdes, John, Costa, Andrew P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7576700/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33081709
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-020-01816-0
_version_ 1783598065703190528
author Mowbray, Fabrice I.
Jones, Aaron
Schumacher, Connie
Hirdes, John
Costa, Andrew P.
author_facet Mowbray, Fabrice I.
Jones, Aaron
Schumacher, Connie
Hirdes, John
Costa, Andrew P.
author_sort Mowbray, Fabrice I.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Detection of Indicators and Vulnerabilities of Emergency Room Trips (DIVERT) scale was developed to classify and estimate the risk of emergency department (ED) use among home care clients. The objective of this study was to externally validate the DIVERT scale in a secondary population of home care clients. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study, linking data from the Home Care Reporting System and the National Ambulatory Care Reporting System. Data were collected on older long-stay home care clients who received a RAI Home Care (RAI-HC) assessment. Data were collected for home care clients in the Canadian provinces of Ontario and Alberta, as well as in the cities of Winnipeg, Manitoba and Whitehorse, Yukon Territories between April 1, 2011 and September 30, 2014. The DIVERT scale was originally derived from the items of the RAI-HC through the use of recursive partitioning informed by a multinational clinical panel. This scale is currently implemented alongside the RAI-HC in provinces across Canada. The primary outcome of this study was ED visitation within 6 months of a RAI-HC assessment. RESULTS: The cohort contained 1,001,133 home care clients. The vast majority of cases received services in Ontario (88%), followed by Alberta (8%), Winnipeg (4%), and Whitehorse (< 1%). Across the four cohorts, the DIVERT scale demonstrated similar discriminative ability to the original validation work for all outcomes during the six-month follow-up: ED visitation (AUC = 0.617–0.647), two or more ED visits (AUC = 0.628–0.634) and hospital admission (AUC = 0.617–0.664). CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study support the external validity of the DIVERT scale. More specifically, the predictive accuracy of the DIVERT scale from the original work was similar to the accuracy demonstrated within a new cohort, created from different geographical regions and time periods.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7576700
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75767002020-10-21 External validation of the detection of indicators and vulnerabilities for emergency room trips (DIVERT) scale: a retrospective cohort study Mowbray, Fabrice I. Jones, Aaron Schumacher, Connie Hirdes, John Costa, Andrew P. BMC Geriatr Research Article BACKGROUND: The Detection of Indicators and Vulnerabilities of Emergency Room Trips (DIVERT) scale was developed to classify and estimate the risk of emergency department (ED) use among home care clients. The objective of this study was to externally validate the DIVERT scale in a secondary population of home care clients. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study, linking data from the Home Care Reporting System and the National Ambulatory Care Reporting System. Data were collected on older long-stay home care clients who received a RAI Home Care (RAI-HC) assessment. Data were collected for home care clients in the Canadian provinces of Ontario and Alberta, as well as in the cities of Winnipeg, Manitoba and Whitehorse, Yukon Territories between April 1, 2011 and September 30, 2014. The DIVERT scale was originally derived from the items of the RAI-HC through the use of recursive partitioning informed by a multinational clinical panel. This scale is currently implemented alongside the RAI-HC in provinces across Canada. The primary outcome of this study was ED visitation within 6 months of a RAI-HC assessment. RESULTS: The cohort contained 1,001,133 home care clients. The vast majority of cases received services in Ontario (88%), followed by Alberta (8%), Winnipeg (4%), and Whitehorse (< 1%). Across the four cohorts, the DIVERT scale demonstrated similar discriminative ability to the original validation work for all outcomes during the six-month follow-up: ED visitation (AUC = 0.617–0.647), two or more ED visits (AUC = 0.628–0.634) and hospital admission (AUC = 0.617–0.664). CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study support the external validity of the DIVERT scale. More specifically, the predictive accuracy of the DIVERT scale from the original work was similar to the accuracy demonstrated within a new cohort, created from different geographical regions and time periods. BioMed Central 2020-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7576700/ /pubmed/33081709 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-020-01816-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mowbray, Fabrice I.
Jones, Aaron
Schumacher, Connie
Hirdes, John
Costa, Andrew P.
External validation of the detection of indicators and vulnerabilities for emergency room trips (DIVERT) scale: a retrospective cohort study
title External validation of the detection of indicators and vulnerabilities for emergency room trips (DIVERT) scale: a retrospective cohort study
title_full External validation of the detection of indicators and vulnerabilities for emergency room trips (DIVERT) scale: a retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr External validation of the detection of indicators and vulnerabilities for emergency room trips (DIVERT) scale: a retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed External validation of the detection of indicators and vulnerabilities for emergency room trips (DIVERT) scale: a retrospective cohort study
title_short External validation of the detection of indicators and vulnerabilities for emergency room trips (DIVERT) scale: a retrospective cohort study
title_sort external validation of the detection of indicators and vulnerabilities for emergency room trips (divert) scale: a retrospective cohort study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7576700/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33081709
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-020-01816-0
work_keys_str_mv AT mowbrayfabricei externalvalidationofthedetectionofindicatorsandvulnerabilitiesforemergencyroomtripsdivertscalearetrospectivecohortstudy
AT jonesaaron externalvalidationofthedetectionofindicatorsandvulnerabilitiesforemergencyroomtripsdivertscalearetrospectivecohortstudy
AT schumacherconnie externalvalidationofthedetectionofindicatorsandvulnerabilitiesforemergencyroomtripsdivertscalearetrospectivecohortstudy
AT hirdesjohn externalvalidationofthedetectionofindicatorsandvulnerabilitiesforemergencyroomtripsdivertscalearetrospectivecohortstudy
AT costaandrewp externalvalidationofthedetectionofindicatorsandvulnerabilitiesforemergencyroomtripsdivertscalearetrospectivecohortstudy