Cargando…
Stress of Conscience Questionnaire (SCQ): exploring dimensionality and psychometric properties at a tertiary hospital in Australia
BACKGROUND: This study explored the psychometric properties and dimensionality of the Stress of Conscience Questionnaire (SCQ) in a sample of health professionals from a tertiary-level Australian hospital. The SCQ, a measure of stress of conscience, is a recently developed nine-item instrument for a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7576718/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33081845 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40359-020-00477-3 |
_version_ | 1783598069449752576 |
---|---|
author | Jokwiro, Yangama Pascoe, Elizabeth Edvardsson, Kristina Rahman, Muhammad Aziz McDonald, Ewan Lood, Qarin Edvardsson, David |
author_facet | Jokwiro, Yangama Pascoe, Elizabeth Edvardsson, Kristina Rahman, Muhammad Aziz McDonald, Ewan Lood, Qarin Edvardsson, David |
author_sort | Jokwiro, Yangama |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This study explored the psychometric properties and dimensionality of the Stress of Conscience Questionnaire (SCQ) in a sample of health professionals from a tertiary-level Australian hospital. The SCQ, a measure of stress of conscience, is a recently developed nine-item instrument for assessing frequently encountered stressful situations in health care, and the degree to which they trouble the conscience of health professionals. This is relevant because stress of conscience has been associated with negative experiences such as job strain and/or burnout. The validity of SCQ has not been explored beyond Scandinavian contexts. METHODS: A cross-sectional study of 253 health professionals was undertaken in 2015. The analysis involved estimates of reliability, variability and dimensionality. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were used to explore dimensionality and theoretical model fit respectively. RESULTS: Cronbach’s alpha of 0.84 showed internal consistency reliability. All individual items of the SCQ (N = 9) met the cut-off criteria for item-total correlations (> 0.3) indicating acceptable homogeneity. Adequate variability was confirmed for most of the items, with some items indicating floor or ceiling effects. EFA retained a single latent factor with adequate factor loadings for a unidimensional structure. When the two‐factor model was compared to the one‐factor model, the latter achieved better goodness of fit supporting a one-factor model for the SCQ. CONCLUSION: The SCQ, as a unidimensional measure of stress of conscience, achieved adequate reliability and variability in this study. Due to unidimensionality of the tool, summation of a total score can be a meaningful way forward to summarise and communicate results from future studies, enabling international comparisons. However, further exploration of the questionnaire in other cultures and clinical settings is recommended to explore the stability of the latent one-factor structure. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7576718 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75767182020-10-21 Stress of Conscience Questionnaire (SCQ): exploring dimensionality and psychometric properties at a tertiary hospital in Australia Jokwiro, Yangama Pascoe, Elizabeth Edvardsson, Kristina Rahman, Muhammad Aziz McDonald, Ewan Lood, Qarin Edvardsson, David BMC Psychol Research Article BACKGROUND: This study explored the psychometric properties and dimensionality of the Stress of Conscience Questionnaire (SCQ) in a sample of health professionals from a tertiary-level Australian hospital. The SCQ, a measure of stress of conscience, is a recently developed nine-item instrument for assessing frequently encountered stressful situations in health care, and the degree to which they trouble the conscience of health professionals. This is relevant because stress of conscience has been associated with negative experiences such as job strain and/or burnout. The validity of SCQ has not been explored beyond Scandinavian contexts. METHODS: A cross-sectional study of 253 health professionals was undertaken in 2015. The analysis involved estimates of reliability, variability and dimensionality. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were used to explore dimensionality and theoretical model fit respectively. RESULTS: Cronbach’s alpha of 0.84 showed internal consistency reliability. All individual items of the SCQ (N = 9) met the cut-off criteria for item-total correlations (> 0.3) indicating acceptable homogeneity. Adequate variability was confirmed for most of the items, with some items indicating floor or ceiling effects. EFA retained a single latent factor with adequate factor loadings for a unidimensional structure. When the two‐factor model was compared to the one‐factor model, the latter achieved better goodness of fit supporting a one-factor model for the SCQ. CONCLUSION: The SCQ, as a unidimensional measure of stress of conscience, achieved adequate reliability and variability in this study. Due to unidimensionality of the tool, summation of a total score can be a meaningful way forward to summarise and communicate results from future studies, enabling international comparisons. However, further exploration of the questionnaire in other cultures and clinical settings is recommended to explore the stability of the latent one-factor structure. BioMed Central 2020-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7576718/ /pubmed/33081845 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40359-020-00477-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Jokwiro, Yangama Pascoe, Elizabeth Edvardsson, Kristina Rahman, Muhammad Aziz McDonald, Ewan Lood, Qarin Edvardsson, David Stress of Conscience Questionnaire (SCQ): exploring dimensionality and psychometric properties at a tertiary hospital in Australia |
title | Stress of Conscience Questionnaire (SCQ): exploring dimensionality and psychometric properties at a tertiary hospital in Australia |
title_full | Stress of Conscience Questionnaire (SCQ): exploring dimensionality and psychometric properties at a tertiary hospital in Australia |
title_fullStr | Stress of Conscience Questionnaire (SCQ): exploring dimensionality and psychometric properties at a tertiary hospital in Australia |
title_full_unstemmed | Stress of Conscience Questionnaire (SCQ): exploring dimensionality and psychometric properties at a tertiary hospital in Australia |
title_short | Stress of Conscience Questionnaire (SCQ): exploring dimensionality and psychometric properties at a tertiary hospital in Australia |
title_sort | stress of conscience questionnaire (scq): exploring dimensionality and psychometric properties at a tertiary hospital in australia |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7576718/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33081845 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40359-020-00477-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jokwiroyangama stressofconsciencequestionnairescqexploringdimensionalityandpsychometricpropertiesatatertiaryhospitalinaustralia AT pascoeelizabeth stressofconsciencequestionnairescqexploringdimensionalityandpsychometricpropertiesatatertiaryhospitalinaustralia AT edvardssonkristina stressofconsciencequestionnairescqexploringdimensionalityandpsychometricpropertiesatatertiaryhospitalinaustralia AT rahmanmuhammadaziz stressofconsciencequestionnairescqexploringdimensionalityandpsychometricpropertiesatatertiaryhospitalinaustralia AT mcdonaldewan stressofconsciencequestionnairescqexploringdimensionalityandpsychometricpropertiesatatertiaryhospitalinaustralia AT loodqarin stressofconsciencequestionnairescqexploringdimensionalityandpsychometricpropertiesatatertiaryhospitalinaustralia AT edvardssondavid stressofconsciencequestionnairescqexploringdimensionalityandpsychometricpropertiesatatertiaryhospitalinaustralia |