Cargando…

Physiological effects of different recruitment maneuvers in a pig model of ARDS

BACKGROUND: In acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), lung recruitment maneuvers can recruit collapsed alveoli in gravity-dependent lung regions, improving the homogeneity of ventilation distribution. This study used electrical impedance tomography to investigate the physiological effects of di...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xia, Feiping, Pan, Chun, Wang, Lihui, Liu, Ling, Liu, Songqiao, Guo, Fengmei, Yang, Yi, Huang, Yingzi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7576861/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33087066
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-020-01164-x
_version_ 1783598100497039360
author Xia, Feiping
Pan, Chun
Wang, Lihui
Liu, Ling
Liu, Songqiao
Guo, Fengmei
Yang, Yi
Huang, Yingzi
author_facet Xia, Feiping
Pan, Chun
Wang, Lihui
Liu, Ling
Liu, Songqiao
Guo, Fengmei
Yang, Yi
Huang, Yingzi
author_sort Xia, Feiping
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), lung recruitment maneuvers can recruit collapsed alveoli in gravity-dependent lung regions, improving the homogeneity of ventilation distribution. This study used electrical impedance tomography to investigate the physiological effects of different recruitment maneuvers for alveolar recruitment in a pig model of ARDS. METHODS: ARDS was induced in ten healthy male pigs with repeated bronchoalveolar lavage until the ratio of arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO(2)) of fraction of inspired oxygen (P/F) was < 100 mmHg and remained stable for 30 min (T(ARDS)). ARDS pigs underwent three sequential recruitment maneuvers, including sustained inflation, increments of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), and pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) applied in random order, with 30 mins at a PEEP of 5 cmH(2)O between maneuvers. Respiratory mechanics, hemodynamics, arterial blood gas, and electrical impedance tomography were recorded at baseline, T(ARDS), and before and after each recruitment maneuver. RESULTS: In all ten pigs, ARDS was successfully induced with a mean 2.8 ± 1.03 L bronchoalveolar lavages. PaO(2), P/F, and compliance were significantly improved after recruitment with sustained inflation, increments of PEEP or PCV (all p < 0.05), and there were no significant differences between maneuvers. Global inhomogeneity index significantly decreased after recruitment with sustained inflation, increments of PEEP, or PCV. There were no significant differences in global inhomogeneity before or after recruitment with the different maneuvers. The decrease in global inhomogeneity index (ΔGI) was significantly greater after recruitment with increments of PEEP compared to sustained inflation (p = 0.023), but there was no significant difference in ΔGI between increments of PEEP and PCV or between sustained inflation and PCV. CONCLUSION: Sustained inflation, increments of PEEP, and PCV increased oxygenation, and regional and global compliance of the respiratory system, and decreased inhomogeneous gas distribution in ARDS pigs. Increments of PEEP significantly improved inhomogeneity of the lung compared to sustained inflation, while there was no difference between increments of PEEP and PCV or between sustained inflation and PCV.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7576861
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75768612020-10-22 Physiological effects of different recruitment maneuvers in a pig model of ARDS Xia, Feiping Pan, Chun Wang, Lihui Liu, Ling Liu, Songqiao Guo, Fengmei Yang, Yi Huang, Yingzi BMC Anesthesiol Research Article BACKGROUND: In acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), lung recruitment maneuvers can recruit collapsed alveoli in gravity-dependent lung regions, improving the homogeneity of ventilation distribution. This study used electrical impedance tomography to investigate the physiological effects of different recruitment maneuvers for alveolar recruitment in a pig model of ARDS. METHODS: ARDS was induced in ten healthy male pigs with repeated bronchoalveolar lavage until the ratio of arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO(2)) of fraction of inspired oxygen (P/F) was < 100 mmHg and remained stable for 30 min (T(ARDS)). ARDS pigs underwent three sequential recruitment maneuvers, including sustained inflation, increments of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), and pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) applied in random order, with 30 mins at a PEEP of 5 cmH(2)O between maneuvers. Respiratory mechanics, hemodynamics, arterial blood gas, and electrical impedance tomography were recorded at baseline, T(ARDS), and before and after each recruitment maneuver. RESULTS: In all ten pigs, ARDS was successfully induced with a mean 2.8 ± 1.03 L bronchoalveolar lavages. PaO(2), P/F, and compliance were significantly improved after recruitment with sustained inflation, increments of PEEP or PCV (all p < 0.05), and there were no significant differences between maneuvers. Global inhomogeneity index significantly decreased after recruitment with sustained inflation, increments of PEEP, or PCV. There were no significant differences in global inhomogeneity before or after recruitment with the different maneuvers. The decrease in global inhomogeneity index (ΔGI) was significantly greater after recruitment with increments of PEEP compared to sustained inflation (p = 0.023), but there was no significant difference in ΔGI between increments of PEEP and PCV or between sustained inflation and PCV. CONCLUSION: Sustained inflation, increments of PEEP, and PCV increased oxygenation, and regional and global compliance of the respiratory system, and decreased inhomogeneous gas distribution in ARDS pigs. Increments of PEEP significantly improved inhomogeneity of the lung compared to sustained inflation, while there was no difference between increments of PEEP and PCV or between sustained inflation and PCV. BioMed Central 2020-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7576861/ /pubmed/33087066 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-020-01164-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Xia, Feiping
Pan, Chun
Wang, Lihui
Liu, Ling
Liu, Songqiao
Guo, Fengmei
Yang, Yi
Huang, Yingzi
Physiological effects of different recruitment maneuvers in a pig model of ARDS
title Physiological effects of different recruitment maneuvers in a pig model of ARDS
title_full Physiological effects of different recruitment maneuvers in a pig model of ARDS
title_fullStr Physiological effects of different recruitment maneuvers in a pig model of ARDS
title_full_unstemmed Physiological effects of different recruitment maneuvers in a pig model of ARDS
title_short Physiological effects of different recruitment maneuvers in a pig model of ARDS
title_sort physiological effects of different recruitment maneuvers in a pig model of ards
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7576861/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33087066
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-020-01164-x
work_keys_str_mv AT xiafeiping physiologicaleffectsofdifferentrecruitmentmaneuversinapigmodelofards
AT panchun physiologicaleffectsofdifferentrecruitmentmaneuversinapigmodelofards
AT wanglihui physiologicaleffectsofdifferentrecruitmentmaneuversinapigmodelofards
AT liuling physiologicaleffectsofdifferentrecruitmentmaneuversinapigmodelofards
AT liusongqiao physiologicaleffectsofdifferentrecruitmentmaneuversinapigmodelofards
AT guofengmei physiologicaleffectsofdifferentrecruitmentmaneuversinapigmodelofards
AT yangyi physiologicaleffectsofdifferentrecruitmentmaneuversinapigmodelofards
AT huangyingzi physiologicaleffectsofdifferentrecruitmentmaneuversinapigmodelofards