Cargando…

Treatment of Refractory Convulsive Status Epilepticus: A Comprehensive Review by the American Epilepsy Society Treatments Committee

PURPOSE: Established tonic–clonic status epilepticus (SE) does not stop in one-third of patients when treated with an intravenous (IV) benzodiazepine bolus followed by a loading dose of a second antiseizure medication (ASM). These patients have refractory status epilepticus (RSE) and a high risk of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vossler, David G., Bainbridge, Jacquelyn L., Boggs, Jane G., Novotny, Edward J., Loddenkemper, Tobias, Faught, Edward, Amengual-Gual, Marta, Fischer, Sarah N., Gloss, David S., Olson, Donald M., Towne, Alan R., Naritoku, Dean, Welty, Timothy E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7576920/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32822230
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1535759720928269
_version_ 1783598111882477568
author Vossler, David G.
Bainbridge, Jacquelyn L.
Boggs, Jane G.
Novotny, Edward J.
Loddenkemper, Tobias
Faught, Edward
Amengual-Gual, Marta
Fischer, Sarah N.
Gloss, David S.
Olson, Donald M.
Towne, Alan R.
Naritoku, Dean
Welty, Timothy E.
author_facet Vossler, David G.
Bainbridge, Jacquelyn L.
Boggs, Jane G.
Novotny, Edward J.
Loddenkemper, Tobias
Faught, Edward
Amengual-Gual, Marta
Fischer, Sarah N.
Gloss, David S.
Olson, Donald M.
Towne, Alan R.
Naritoku, Dean
Welty, Timothy E.
author_sort Vossler, David G.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Established tonic–clonic status epilepticus (SE) does not stop in one-third of patients when treated with an intravenous (IV) benzodiazepine bolus followed by a loading dose of a second antiseizure medication (ASM). These patients have refractory status epilepticus (RSE) and a high risk of morbidity and death. For patients with convulsive refractory status epilepticus (CRSE), we sought to determine the strength of evidence for 8 parenteral ASMs used as third-line treatment in stopping clinical CRSE. METHODS: A structured literature search (MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, CINAHL) was performed to identify original studies on the treatment of CRSE in children and adults using IV brivaracetam, ketamine, lacosamide, levetiracetam (LEV), midazolam (MDZ), pentobarbital (PTB; and thiopental), propofol (PRO), and valproic acid (VPA). Adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg), magnesium sulfate, and pyridoxine were added to determine the effectiveness in treating hard-to-control seizures in special circumstances. Studies were evaluated by predefined criteria and were classified by strength of evidence in stopping clinical CRSE (either as the last ASM added or compared to another ASM) according to the 2017 American Academy of Neurology process. RESULTS: No studies exist on the use of ACTH, corticosteroids, or IVIg for the treatment of CRSE. Small series and case reports exist on the use of these agents in the treatment of RSE of suspected immune etiology, severe epileptic encephalopathies, and rare epilepsy syndromes. For adults with CRSE, insufficient evidence exists on the effectiveness of brivaracetam (level U; 4 class IV studies). For children and adults with CRSE, insufficient evidence exists on the effectiveness of ketamine (level U; 25 class IV studies). For children and adults with CRSE, it is possible that lacosamide is effective at stopping RSE (level C; 2 class III, 14 class IV studies). For children with CRSE, insufficient evidence exists that LEV and VPA are equally effective (level U, 1 class III study). For adults with CRSE, insufficient evidence exists to support the effectiveness of LEV (level U; 2 class IV studies). Magnesium sulfate may be effective in the treatment of eclampsia, but there are only case reports of its use for CRSE. For children with CRSE, insufficient evidence exists to support either that MDZ and diazepam infusions are equally effective (level U; 1 class III study) or that MDZ infusion and PTB are equally effective (level U; 1 class III study). For adults with CRSE, insufficient evidence exists to support either that MDZ infusion and PRO are equally effective (level U; 1 class III study) or that low-dose and high-dose MDZ infusions are equally effective (level U; 1 class III study). For children and adults with CRSE, insufficient evidence exists to support that MDZ is effective as the last drug added (level U; 29 class IV studies). For adults with CRSE, insufficient evidence exists to support that PTB and PRO are equally effective (level U; 1 class III study). For adults and children with CRSE, insufficient evidence exists to support that PTB is effective as the last ASM added (level U; 42 class IV studies). For CRSE, insufficient evidence exists to support that PRO is effective as the last ASM used (level U; 26 class IV studies). No pediatric-only studies exist on the use of PRO for CRSE, and many guidelines do not recommend its use in children aged <16 years. Pyridoxine-dependent and pyridoxine-responsive epilepsies should be considered in children presenting between birth and age 3 years with refractory seizures and no imaging lesion or other acquired cause of seizures. For children with CRSE, insufficient evidence exists that VPA and diazepam infusion are equally effective (level U, 1 class III study). No class I to III studies have been reported in adults treated with VPA for CRSE. In comparison, for children and adults with established convulsive SE (ie, not RSE), after an initial benzodiazepine, it is likely that loading doses of LEV 60 mg/kg, VPA 40 mg/kg, and fosphenytoin 20 mg PE/kg are equally effective at stopping SE (level B, 1 class I study). CONCLUSIONS: Mostly insufficient evidence exists on the efficacy of stopping clinical CRSE using brivaracetam, lacosamide, LEV, valproate, ketamine, MDZ, PTB, and PRO either as the last ASM or compared to others of these drugs. Adrenocorticotropic hormone, IVIg, corticosteroids, magnesium sulfate, and pyridoxine have been used in special situations but have not been studied for CRSE. For the treatment of established convulsive SE (ie, not RSE), LEV, VPA, and fosphenytoin are likely equally effective, but whether this is also true for CRSE is unknown. Triple-masked, randomized controlled trials are needed to compare the effectiveness of parenteral anesthetizing and nonanesthetizing ASMs in the treatment of CRSE.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7576920
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75769202020-10-28 Treatment of Refractory Convulsive Status Epilepticus: A Comprehensive Review by the American Epilepsy Society Treatments Committee Vossler, David G. Bainbridge, Jacquelyn L. Boggs, Jane G. Novotny, Edward J. Loddenkemper, Tobias Faught, Edward Amengual-Gual, Marta Fischer, Sarah N. Gloss, David S. Olson, Donald M. Towne, Alan R. Naritoku, Dean Welty, Timothy E. Epilepsy Curr Current Review in Clinical Science PURPOSE: Established tonic–clonic status epilepticus (SE) does not stop in one-third of patients when treated with an intravenous (IV) benzodiazepine bolus followed by a loading dose of a second antiseizure medication (ASM). These patients have refractory status epilepticus (RSE) and a high risk of morbidity and death. For patients with convulsive refractory status epilepticus (CRSE), we sought to determine the strength of evidence for 8 parenteral ASMs used as third-line treatment in stopping clinical CRSE. METHODS: A structured literature search (MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, CINAHL) was performed to identify original studies on the treatment of CRSE in children and adults using IV brivaracetam, ketamine, lacosamide, levetiracetam (LEV), midazolam (MDZ), pentobarbital (PTB; and thiopental), propofol (PRO), and valproic acid (VPA). Adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg), magnesium sulfate, and pyridoxine were added to determine the effectiveness in treating hard-to-control seizures in special circumstances. Studies were evaluated by predefined criteria and were classified by strength of evidence in stopping clinical CRSE (either as the last ASM added or compared to another ASM) according to the 2017 American Academy of Neurology process. RESULTS: No studies exist on the use of ACTH, corticosteroids, or IVIg for the treatment of CRSE. Small series and case reports exist on the use of these agents in the treatment of RSE of suspected immune etiology, severe epileptic encephalopathies, and rare epilepsy syndromes. For adults with CRSE, insufficient evidence exists on the effectiveness of brivaracetam (level U; 4 class IV studies). For children and adults with CRSE, insufficient evidence exists on the effectiveness of ketamine (level U; 25 class IV studies). For children and adults with CRSE, it is possible that lacosamide is effective at stopping RSE (level C; 2 class III, 14 class IV studies). For children with CRSE, insufficient evidence exists that LEV and VPA are equally effective (level U, 1 class III study). For adults with CRSE, insufficient evidence exists to support the effectiveness of LEV (level U; 2 class IV studies). Magnesium sulfate may be effective in the treatment of eclampsia, but there are only case reports of its use for CRSE. For children with CRSE, insufficient evidence exists to support either that MDZ and diazepam infusions are equally effective (level U; 1 class III study) or that MDZ infusion and PTB are equally effective (level U; 1 class III study). For adults with CRSE, insufficient evidence exists to support either that MDZ infusion and PRO are equally effective (level U; 1 class III study) or that low-dose and high-dose MDZ infusions are equally effective (level U; 1 class III study). For children and adults with CRSE, insufficient evidence exists to support that MDZ is effective as the last drug added (level U; 29 class IV studies). For adults with CRSE, insufficient evidence exists to support that PTB and PRO are equally effective (level U; 1 class III study). For adults and children with CRSE, insufficient evidence exists to support that PTB is effective as the last ASM added (level U; 42 class IV studies). For CRSE, insufficient evidence exists to support that PRO is effective as the last ASM used (level U; 26 class IV studies). No pediatric-only studies exist on the use of PRO for CRSE, and many guidelines do not recommend its use in children aged <16 years. Pyridoxine-dependent and pyridoxine-responsive epilepsies should be considered in children presenting between birth and age 3 years with refractory seizures and no imaging lesion or other acquired cause of seizures. For children with CRSE, insufficient evidence exists that VPA and diazepam infusion are equally effective (level U, 1 class III study). No class I to III studies have been reported in adults treated with VPA for CRSE. In comparison, for children and adults with established convulsive SE (ie, not RSE), after an initial benzodiazepine, it is likely that loading doses of LEV 60 mg/kg, VPA 40 mg/kg, and fosphenytoin 20 mg PE/kg are equally effective at stopping SE (level B, 1 class I study). CONCLUSIONS: Mostly insufficient evidence exists on the efficacy of stopping clinical CRSE using brivaracetam, lacosamide, LEV, valproate, ketamine, MDZ, PTB, and PRO either as the last ASM or compared to others of these drugs. Adrenocorticotropic hormone, IVIg, corticosteroids, magnesium sulfate, and pyridoxine have been used in special situations but have not been studied for CRSE. For the treatment of established convulsive SE (ie, not RSE), LEV, VPA, and fosphenytoin are likely equally effective, but whether this is also true for CRSE is unknown. Triple-masked, randomized controlled trials are needed to compare the effectiveness of parenteral anesthetizing and nonanesthetizing ASMs in the treatment of CRSE. SAGE Publications 2020-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7576920/ /pubmed/32822230 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1535759720928269 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Current Review in Clinical Science
Vossler, David G.
Bainbridge, Jacquelyn L.
Boggs, Jane G.
Novotny, Edward J.
Loddenkemper, Tobias
Faught, Edward
Amengual-Gual, Marta
Fischer, Sarah N.
Gloss, David S.
Olson, Donald M.
Towne, Alan R.
Naritoku, Dean
Welty, Timothy E.
Treatment of Refractory Convulsive Status Epilepticus: A Comprehensive Review by the American Epilepsy Society Treatments Committee
title Treatment of Refractory Convulsive Status Epilepticus: A Comprehensive Review by the American Epilepsy Society Treatments Committee
title_full Treatment of Refractory Convulsive Status Epilepticus: A Comprehensive Review by the American Epilepsy Society Treatments Committee
title_fullStr Treatment of Refractory Convulsive Status Epilepticus: A Comprehensive Review by the American Epilepsy Society Treatments Committee
title_full_unstemmed Treatment of Refractory Convulsive Status Epilepticus: A Comprehensive Review by the American Epilepsy Society Treatments Committee
title_short Treatment of Refractory Convulsive Status Epilepticus: A Comprehensive Review by the American Epilepsy Society Treatments Committee
title_sort treatment of refractory convulsive status epilepticus: a comprehensive review by the american epilepsy society treatments committee
topic Current Review in Clinical Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7576920/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32822230
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1535759720928269
work_keys_str_mv AT vosslerdavidg treatmentofrefractoryconvulsivestatusepilepticusacomprehensivereviewbytheamericanepilepsysocietytreatmentscommittee
AT bainbridgejacquelynl treatmentofrefractoryconvulsivestatusepilepticusacomprehensivereviewbytheamericanepilepsysocietytreatmentscommittee
AT boggsjaneg treatmentofrefractoryconvulsivestatusepilepticusacomprehensivereviewbytheamericanepilepsysocietytreatmentscommittee
AT novotnyedwardj treatmentofrefractoryconvulsivestatusepilepticusacomprehensivereviewbytheamericanepilepsysocietytreatmentscommittee
AT loddenkempertobias treatmentofrefractoryconvulsivestatusepilepticusacomprehensivereviewbytheamericanepilepsysocietytreatmentscommittee
AT faughtedward treatmentofrefractoryconvulsivestatusepilepticusacomprehensivereviewbytheamericanepilepsysocietytreatmentscommittee
AT amengualgualmarta treatmentofrefractoryconvulsivestatusepilepticusacomprehensivereviewbytheamericanepilepsysocietytreatmentscommittee
AT fischersarahn treatmentofrefractoryconvulsivestatusepilepticusacomprehensivereviewbytheamericanepilepsysocietytreatmentscommittee
AT glossdavids treatmentofrefractoryconvulsivestatusepilepticusacomprehensivereviewbytheamericanepilepsysocietytreatmentscommittee
AT olsondonaldm treatmentofrefractoryconvulsivestatusepilepticusacomprehensivereviewbytheamericanepilepsysocietytreatmentscommittee
AT townealanr treatmentofrefractoryconvulsivestatusepilepticusacomprehensivereviewbytheamericanepilepsysocietytreatmentscommittee
AT naritokudean treatmentofrefractoryconvulsivestatusepilepticusacomprehensivereviewbytheamericanepilepsysocietytreatmentscommittee
AT weltytimothye treatmentofrefractoryconvulsivestatusepilepticusacomprehensivereviewbytheamericanepilepsysocietytreatmentscommittee