Cargando…

Comparison of the detection rates for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) of the 2013 Philippine Academy of Ophthalmology (PAO) Revised Philippine Guidelines and the 2005 PAO-Philippine Pediatric Society (PPS) Guidelines for ROP screening in the Philippine General Hospital: a 5-year review

OBJECTIVES: Compare the detection rates of the 2013 Philippine Academy of Ophthalmology (PAO) guidelines for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) screening and the 2005 PAO-Philippine Pediatric Society guidelines in identifying infants who develop ROP in the 5-year study period in the Philippine General...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Paulino, Jose Antonio Tan, Santiago, Alvina Pauline Dy, Santiago, Darby Espiritu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7577054/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33094166
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2020-000448
_version_ 1783598133983313920
author Paulino, Jose Antonio Tan
Santiago, Alvina Pauline Dy
Santiago, Darby Espiritu
author_facet Paulino, Jose Antonio Tan
Santiago, Alvina Pauline Dy
Santiago, Darby Espiritu
author_sort Paulino, Jose Antonio Tan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Compare the detection rates of the 2013 Philippine Academy of Ophthalmology (PAO) guidelines for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) screening and the 2005 PAO-Philippine Pediatric Society guidelines in identifying infants who develop ROP in the 5-year study period in the Philippine General Hospital (PGH). Secondary objectives include determination of ROP prevalence; correlation of gestational age (GA), birth weight (BW) and other risk factors to ROP; and identification of the most common intervention. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Retrospective cross-sectional study of ROP records between 1 December 2013 and 30 November 2018 from the Medical Retina Service of the Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences of the institution was studied. Variables with p value <0.05 were considered significant. STATA V.14 was used for all analysis. RESULTS: Only 851 of 898 infants screened for ROP were included in the study. Of these 698 would have been screened based on 2005 guidelines. All 118 infants with ROP were identified by both guidelines. Detection rate was higher using the 2005 than the 2013 guidelines (16.9% vs 13.3%, p value=0.0496). ROP prevalence was 9.7%. Among those with ROP, 70% have at least one identified risk factor, topped by sepsis, pneumonia, hyaline membrane disease, blood transfusion and oxygen supplementation. Only 8% required intervention consisting of laser, anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injection, surgery or in combination. CONCLUSION: In PGH, no infants with ROP were missed using the 2005 recommendations. There was no added benefit of increasing threshold for BW and GA as recommended by the 2013 PAO guidelines. Screening guidelines should, however, be tailored to institutional needs, requirements and experience.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7577054
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75770542020-10-21 Comparison of the detection rates for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) of the 2013 Philippine Academy of Ophthalmology (PAO) Revised Philippine Guidelines and the 2005 PAO-Philippine Pediatric Society (PPS) Guidelines for ROP screening in the Philippine General Hospital: a 5-year review Paulino, Jose Antonio Tan Santiago, Alvina Pauline Dy Santiago, Darby Espiritu BMJ Open Ophthalmol Original Research OBJECTIVES: Compare the detection rates of the 2013 Philippine Academy of Ophthalmology (PAO) guidelines for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) screening and the 2005 PAO-Philippine Pediatric Society guidelines in identifying infants who develop ROP in the 5-year study period in the Philippine General Hospital (PGH). Secondary objectives include determination of ROP prevalence; correlation of gestational age (GA), birth weight (BW) and other risk factors to ROP; and identification of the most common intervention. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Retrospective cross-sectional study of ROP records between 1 December 2013 and 30 November 2018 from the Medical Retina Service of the Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences of the institution was studied. Variables with p value <0.05 were considered significant. STATA V.14 was used for all analysis. RESULTS: Only 851 of 898 infants screened for ROP were included in the study. Of these 698 would have been screened based on 2005 guidelines. All 118 infants with ROP were identified by both guidelines. Detection rate was higher using the 2005 than the 2013 guidelines (16.9% vs 13.3%, p value=0.0496). ROP prevalence was 9.7%. Among those with ROP, 70% have at least one identified risk factor, topped by sepsis, pneumonia, hyaline membrane disease, blood transfusion and oxygen supplementation. Only 8% required intervention consisting of laser, anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injection, surgery or in combination. CONCLUSION: In PGH, no infants with ROP were missed using the 2005 recommendations. There was no added benefit of increasing threshold for BW and GA as recommended by the 2013 PAO guidelines. Screening guidelines should, however, be tailored to institutional needs, requirements and experience. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7577054/ /pubmed/33094166 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2020-000448 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Research
Paulino, Jose Antonio Tan
Santiago, Alvina Pauline Dy
Santiago, Darby Espiritu
Comparison of the detection rates for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) of the 2013 Philippine Academy of Ophthalmology (PAO) Revised Philippine Guidelines and the 2005 PAO-Philippine Pediatric Society (PPS) Guidelines for ROP screening in the Philippine General Hospital: a 5-year review
title Comparison of the detection rates for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) of the 2013 Philippine Academy of Ophthalmology (PAO) Revised Philippine Guidelines and the 2005 PAO-Philippine Pediatric Society (PPS) Guidelines for ROP screening in the Philippine General Hospital: a 5-year review
title_full Comparison of the detection rates for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) of the 2013 Philippine Academy of Ophthalmology (PAO) Revised Philippine Guidelines and the 2005 PAO-Philippine Pediatric Society (PPS) Guidelines for ROP screening in the Philippine General Hospital: a 5-year review
title_fullStr Comparison of the detection rates for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) of the 2013 Philippine Academy of Ophthalmology (PAO) Revised Philippine Guidelines and the 2005 PAO-Philippine Pediatric Society (PPS) Guidelines for ROP screening in the Philippine General Hospital: a 5-year review
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the detection rates for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) of the 2013 Philippine Academy of Ophthalmology (PAO) Revised Philippine Guidelines and the 2005 PAO-Philippine Pediatric Society (PPS) Guidelines for ROP screening in the Philippine General Hospital: a 5-year review
title_short Comparison of the detection rates for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) of the 2013 Philippine Academy of Ophthalmology (PAO) Revised Philippine Guidelines and the 2005 PAO-Philippine Pediatric Society (PPS) Guidelines for ROP screening in the Philippine General Hospital: a 5-year review
title_sort comparison of the detection rates for retinopathy of prematurity (rop) of the 2013 philippine academy of ophthalmology (pao) revised philippine guidelines and the 2005 pao-philippine pediatric society (pps) guidelines for rop screening in the philippine general hospital: a 5-year review
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7577054/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33094166
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2020-000448
work_keys_str_mv AT paulinojoseantoniotan comparisonofthedetectionratesforretinopathyofprematurityropofthe2013philippineacademyofophthalmologypaorevisedphilippineguidelinesandthe2005paophilippinepediatricsocietyppsguidelinesforropscreeninginthephilippinegeneralhospitala5yearreview
AT santiagoalvinapaulinedy comparisonofthedetectionratesforretinopathyofprematurityropofthe2013philippineacademyofophthalmologypaorevisedphilippineguidelinesandthe2005paophilippinepediatricsocietyppsguidelinesforropscreeninginthephilippinegeneralhospitala5yearreview
AT santiagodarbyespiritu comparisonofthedetectionratesforretinopathyofprematurityropofthe2013philippineacademyofophthalmologypaorevisedphilippineguidelinesandthe2005paophilippinepediatricsocietyppsguidelinesforropscreeninginthephilippinegeneralhospitala5yearreview