Cargando…
The Prevalence of Transfusion-transmitted Infections among Blood Donors in Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia
OBJECTIVES: Blood bank centers routinely screen for hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) to ensure the safety of blood supply and thus prevent the dissemination of these viruses via blood transfusion. We sought to evaluate the detection of transfus...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
OMJ
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7577371/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33110633 http://dx.doi.org/10.5001/omj.2020.86 |
_version_ | 1783598182525042688 |
---|---|
author | Ramli, Marini Zulkafli, Zefarina Chambers, Geoffrey Keith Zilan, Raja Sabrina Amani Raja Edinur, Hisham Atan |
author_facet | Ramli, Marini Zulkafli, Zefarina Chambers, Geoffrey Keith Zilan, Raja Sabrina Amani Raja Edinur, Hisham Atan |
author_sort | Ramli, Marini |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Blood bank centers routinely screen for hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) to ensure the safety of blood supply and thus prevent the dissemination of these viruses via blood transfusion. We sought to evaluate the detection of transfusion-transmitted infection (TTI) markers using standard serological methods and nucleic acid testing (NAT) among blood donors in Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia. METHODS: Donated blood units were assessed for the presence or absence of HBV, HCV, and HIV using two screening method: serology and NAT. Reactive blood samples were then subjected to serological confirmatory and NAT discriminatory assays. RESULTS: A total of 9669 donors were recruited from September 2017 to June 2018. Among these, 36 donors were reactive either for HBV, HCV, or HIV by serological testing and eight by NAT screening. However, only 10 (three for HBV and seven for HCV) donors tested positive using serological testing and five (two for HBV and three for HCV) by NAT discriminatory assays. Note that all five NAT positive donors detected in the NAT discriminatory assays were confirmed to be serologically reactive. Therefore, the prevalence of HBV, HCV, and HIV was 0.03%, 0.1%, and 0.0%, respectively, in our donor pool. CONCLUSIONS: Both serological and NAT screening and confirmatory assays should be used routinely to reduce the risk of infection transmission via the transfusion of blood and blood components. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7577371 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | OMJ |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75773712020-10-26 The Prevalence of Transfusion-transmitted Infections among Blood Donors in Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia Ramli, Marini Zulkafli, Zefarina Chambers, Geoffrey Keith Zilan, Raja Sabrina Amani Raja Edinur, Hisham Atan Oman Med J Original Article OBJECTIVES: Blood bank centers routinely screen for hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) to ensure the safety of blood supply and thus prevent the dissemination of these viruses via blood transfusion. We sought to evaluate the detection of transfusion-transmitted infection (TTI) markers using standard serological methods and nucleic acid testing (NAT) among blood donors in Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia. METHODS: Donated blood units were assessed for the presence or absence of HBV, HCV, and HIV using two screening method: serology and NAT. Reactive blood samples were then subjected to serological confirmatory and NAT discriminatory assays. RESULTS: A total of 9669 donors were recruited from September 2017 to June 2018. Among these, 36 donors were reactive either for HBV, HCV, or HIV by serological testing and eight by NAT screening. However, only 10 (three for HBV and seven for HCV) donors tested positive using serological testing and five (two for HBV and three for HCV) by NAT discriminatory assays. Note that all five NAT positive donors detected in the NAT discriminatory assays were confirmed to be serologically reactive. Therefore, the prevalence of HBV, HCV, and HIV was 0.03%, 0.1%, and 0.0%, respectively, in our donor pool. CONCLUSIONS: Both serological and NAT screening and confirmatory assays should be used routinely to reduce the risk of infection transmission via the transfusion of blood and blood components. OMJ 2020-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7577371/ /pubmed/33110633 http://dx.doi.org/10.5001/omj.2020.86 Text en The OMJ is Published Bimonthly and Copyrighted 2020 by the OMSB. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 License. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Original Article Ramli, Marini Zulkafli, Zefarina Chambers, Geoffrey Keith Zilan, Raja Sabrina Amani Raja Edinur, Hisham Atan The Prevalence of Transfusion-transmitted Infections among Blood Donors in Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia |
title | The Prevalence of Transfusion-transmitted Infections among Blood Donors in Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia |
title_full | The Prevalence of Transfusion-transmitted Infections among Blood Donors in Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia |
title_fullStr | The Prevalence of Transfusion-transmitted Infections among Blood Donors in Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia |
title_full_unstemmed | The Prevalence of Transfusion-transmitted Infections among Blood Donors in Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia |
title_short | The Prevalence of Transfusion-transmitted Infections among Blood Donors in Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia |
title_sort | prevalence of transfusion-transmitted infections among blood donors in hospital universiti sains malaysia |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7577371/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33110633 http://dx.doi.org/10.5001/omj.2020.86 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ramlimarini theprevalenceoftransfusiontransmittedinfectionsamongblooddonorsinhospitaluniversitisainsmalaysia AT zulkaflizefarina theprevalenceoftransfusiontransmittedinfectionsamongblooddonorsinhospitaluniversitisainsmalaysia AT chambersgeoffreykeith theprevalenceoftransfusiontransmittedinfectionsamongblooddonorsinhospitaluniversitisainsmalaysia AT zilanrajasabrinaamaniraja theprevalenceoftransfusiontransmittedinfectionsamongblooddonorsinhospitaluniversitisainsmalaysia AT edinurhishamatan theprevalenceoftransfusiontransmittedinfectionsamongblooddonorsinhospitaluniversitisainsmalaysia AT ramlimarini prevalenceoftransfusiontransmittedinfectionsamongblooddonorsinhospitaluniversitisainsmalaysia AT zulkaflizefarina prevalenceoftransfusiontransmittedinfectionsamongblooddonorsinhospitaluniversitisainsmalaysia AT chambersgeoffreykeith prevalenceoftransfusiontransmittedinfectionsamongblooddonorsinhospitaluniversitisainsmalaysia AT zilanrajasabrinaamaniraja prevalenceoftransfusiontransmittedinfectionsamongblooddonorsinhospitaluniversitisainsmalaysia AT edinurhishamatan prevalenceoftransfusiontransmittedinfectionsamongblooddonorsinhospitaluniversitisainsmalaysia |