Cargando…

The Prevalence of Transfusion-transmitted Infections among Blood Donors in Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia

OBJECTIVES: Blood bank centers routinely screen for hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) to ensure the safety of blood supply and thus prevent the dissemination of these viruses via blood transfusion. We sought to evaluate the detection of transfus...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ramli, Marini, Zulkafli, Zefarina, Chambers, Geoffrey Keith, Zilan, Raja Sabrina Amani Raja, Edinur, Hisham Atan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: OMJ 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7577371/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33110633
http://dx.doi.org/10.5001/omj.2020.86
_version_ 1783598182525042688
author Ramli, Marini
Zulkafli, Zefarina
Chambers, Geoffrey Keith
Zilan, Raja Sabrina Amani Raja
Edinur, Hisham Atan
author_facet Ramli, Marini
Zulkafli, Zefarina
Chambers, Geoffrey Keith
Zilan, Raja Sabrina Amani Raja
Edinur, Hisham Atan
author_sort Ramli, Marini
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Blood bank centers routinely screen for hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) to ensure the safety of blood supply and thus prevent the dissemination of these viruses via blood transfusion. We sought to evaluate the detection of transfusion-transmitted infection (TTI) markers using standard serological methods and nucleic acid testing (NAT) among blood donors in Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia. METHODS: Donated blood units were assessed for the presence or absence of HBV, HCV, and HIV using two screening method: serology and NAT. Reactive blood samples were then subjected to serological confirmatory and NAT discriminatory assays. RESULTS: A total of 9669 donors were recruited from September 2017 to June 2018. Among these, 36 donors were reactive either for HBV, HCV, or HIV by serological testing and eight by NAT screening. However, only 10 (three for HBV and seven for HCV) donors tested positive using serological testing and five (two for HBV and three for HCV) by NAT discriminatory assays. Note that all five NAT positive donors detected in the NAT discriminatory assays were confirmed to be serologically reactive. Therefore, the prevalence of HBV, HCV, and HIV was 0.03%, 0.1%, and 0.0%, respectively, in our donor pool. CONCLUSIONS: Both serological and NAT screening and confirmatory assays should be used routinely to reduce the risk of infection transmission via the transfusion of blood and blood components.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7577371
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher OMJ
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75773712020-10-26 The Prevalence of Transfusion-transmitted Infections among Blood Donors in Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia Ramli, Marini Zulkafli, Zefarina Chambers, Geoffrey Keith Zilan, Raja Sabrina Amani Raja Edinur, Hisham Atan Oman Med J Original Article OBJECTIVES: Blood bank centers routinely screen for hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) to ensure the safety of blood supply and thus prevent the dissemination of these viruses via blood transfusion. We sought to evaluate the detection of transfusion-transmitted infection (TTI) markers using standard serological methods and nucleic acid testing (NAT) among blood donors in Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia. METHODS: Donated blood units were assessed for the presence or absence of HBV, HCV, and HIV using two screening method: serology and NAT. Reactive blood samples were then subjected to serological confirmatory and NAT discriminatory assays. RESULTS: A total of 9669 donors were recruited from September 2017 to June 2018. Among these, 36 donors were reactive either for HBV, HCV, or HIV by serological testing and eight by NAT screening. However, only 10 (three for HBV and seven for HCV) donors tested positive using serological testing and five (two for HBV and three for HCV) by NAT discriminatory assays. Note that all five NAT positive donors detected in the NAT discriminatory assays were confirmed to be serologically reactive. Therefore, the prevalence of HBV, HCV, and HIV was 0.03%, 0.1%, and 0.0%, respectively, in our donor pool. CONCLUSIONS: Both serological and NAT screening and confirmatory assays should be used routinely to reduce the risk of infection transmission via the transfusion of blood and blood components. OMJ 2020-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7577371/ /pubmed/33110633 http://dx.doi.org/10.5001/omj.2020.86 Text en The OMJ is Published Bimonthly and Copyrighted 2020 by the OMSB. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 License. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Original Article
Ramli, Marini
Zulkafli, Zefarina
Chambers, Geoffrey Keith
Zilan, Raja Sabrina Amani Raja
Edinur, Hisham Atan
The Prevalence of Transfusion-transmitted Infections among Blood Donors in Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia
title The Prevalence of Transfusion-transmitted Infections among Blood Donors in Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia
title_full The Prevalence of Transfusion-transmitted Infections among Blood Donors in Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia
title_fullStr The Prevalence of Transfusion-transmitted Infections among Blood Donors in Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia
title_full_unstemmed The Prevalence of Transfusion-transmitted Infections among Blood Donors in Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia
title_short The Prevalence of Transfusion-transmitted Infections among Blood Donors in Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia
title_sort prevalence of transfusion-transmitted infections among blood donors in hospital universiti sains malaysia
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7577371/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33110633
http://dx.doi.org/10.5001/omj.2020.86
work_keys_str_mv AT ramlimarini theprevalenceoftransfusiontransmittedinfectionsamongblooddonorsinhospitaluniversitisainsmalaysia
AT zulkaflizefarina theprevalenceoftransfusiontransmittedinfectionsamongblooddonorsinhospitaluniversitisainsmalaysia
AT chambersgeoffreykeith theprevalenceoftransfusiontransmittedinfectionsamongblooddonorsinhospitaluniversitisainsmalaysia
AT zilanrajasabrinaamaniraja theprevalenceoftransfusiontransmittedinfectionsamongblooddonorsinhospitaluniversitisainsmalaysia
AT edinurhishamatan theprevalenceoftransfusiontransmittedinfectionsamongblooddonorsinhospitaluniversitisainsmalaysia
AT ramlimarini prevalenceoftransfusiontransmittedinfectionsamongblooddonorsinhospitaluniversitisainsmalaysia
AT zulkaflizefarina prevalenceoftransfusiontransmittedinfectionsamongblooddonorsinhospitaluniversitisainsmalaysia
AT chambersgeoffreykeith prevalenceoftransfusiontransmittedinfectionsamongblooddonorsinhospitaluniversitisainsmalaysia
AT zilanrajasabrinaamaniraja prevalenceoftransfusiontransmittedinfectionsamongblooddonorsinhospitaluniversitisainsmalaysia
AT edinurhishamatan prevalenceoftransfusiontransmittedinfectionsamongblooddonorsinhospitaluniversitisainsmalaysia