Cargando…

Survival of South African patients on renal replacement therapy

BACKGROUND: The majority of South Africans rely on a resource-constrained public healthcare sector, where access to renal replacement therapy (RRT) is strictly rationed. The incidence of RRT in this sector is only 4.4 per million population (pmp), whereas it is 139 pmp in the private sector, which s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jardine, Thabiet, Wong, Esther, Steenkamp, Retha, Caskey, Fergus J, Davids, Mogamat Razeen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7577754/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33124999
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfaa012
_version_ 1783598240244957184
author Jardine, Thabiet
Wong, Esther
Steenkamp, Retha
Caskey, Fergus J
Davids, Mogamat Razeen
author_facet Jardine, Thabiet
Wong, Esther
Steenkamp, Retha
Caskey, Fergus J
Davids, Mogamat Razeen
author_sort Jardine, Thabiet
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The majority of South Africans rely on a resource-constrained public healthcare sector, where access to renal replacement therapy (RRT) is strictly rationed. The incidence of RRT in this sector is only 4.4 per million population (pmp), whereas it is 139 pmp in the private sector, which serves mainly the 16% of South Africans who have medical insurance. Data on the outcomes of RRT may influence policies and resource allocation. This study evaluated, for the first time, the survival of South African patients starting RRT based on data from the South African Renal Registry. METHODS: The cohort included patients with end-stage kidney disease who initiated RRT between January 2013 and September 2016. Data were collected on potential risk factors for mortality. Failure events included stopping treatment without recovery of renal function and death. Patients were censored at 1 year or upon recovery of renal function or loss to follow-up. The 1-year patient survival was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method and the association of potential risk factors with survival was assessed using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS: The cohort comprised 6187 patients. The median age was 52.5 years, 47.2% had diabetes, 10.2% were human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positive and 82.2% had haemodialysis as their first RRT modality. A total of 542 patients died within 1 year of initiating RRT, and overall 1-year survival was 90.4% [95% confidence interval (CI) 89.6–91.2]. Survival was similar in patients treated in the private sector as compared with the public healthcare sector [hazard ratio 0.93 (95% CI 0.72–1.21)]. Higher mortality was associated with older age and a primary renal diagnosis of ‘Other’ or ‘Aetiology unknown’. When compared with those residing in the Western Cape, patients residing in the Northern Cape, Eastern Cape, Mpumalanga and Free State provinces had higher mortality. There was no difference in mortality based on ethnicity, diabetes or treatment modality. The 1-year survival was 95.9 and 94.2% in HIV-positive and -negative patients, respectively. One-fifth of the cohort had no data on HIV status and the survival in this group was considerably lower at 77.1% (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The survival rates of South African patients accessing RRT are comparable to those in better-resourced countries. It is still unclear what effect, if any, HIV infection has on survival.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7577754
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75777542020-10-28 Survival of South African patients on renal replacement therapy Jardine, Thabiet Wong, Esther Steenkamp, Retha Caskey, Fergus J Davids, Mogamat Razeen Clin Kidney J Original Articles BACKGROUND: The majority of South Africans rely on a resource-constrained public healthcare sector, where access to renal replacement therapy (RRT) is strictly rationed. The incidence of RRT in this sector is only 4.4 per million population (pmp), whereas it is 139 pmp in the private sector, which serves mainly the 16% of South Africans who have medical insurance. Data on the outcomes of RRT may influence policies and resource allocation. This study evaluated, for the first time, the survival of South African patients starting RRT based on data from the South African Renal Registry. METHODS: The cohort included patients with end-stage kidney disease who initiated RRT between January 2013 and September 2016. Data were collected on potential risk factors for mortality. Failure events included stopping treatment without recovery of renal function and death. Patients were censored at 1 year or upon recovery of renal function or loss to follow-up. The 1-year patient survival was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method and the association of potential risk factors with survival was assessed using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS: The cohort comprised 6187 patients. The median age was 52.5 years, 47.2% had diabetes, 10.2% were human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positive and 82.2% had haemodialysis as their first RRT modality. A total of 542 patients died within 1 year of initiating RRT, and overall 1-year survival was 90.4% [95% confidence interval (CI) 89.6–91.2]. Survival was similar in patients treated in the private sector as compared with the public healthcare sector [hazard ratio 0.93 (95% CI 0.72–1.21)]. Higher mortality was associated with older age and a primary renal diagnosis of ‘Other’ or ‘Aetiology unknown’. When compared with those residing in the Western Cape, patients residing in the Northern Cape, Eastern Cape, Mpumalanga and Free State provinces had higher mortality. There was no difference in mortality based on ethnicity, diabetes or treatment modality. The 1-year survival was 95.9 and 94.2% in HIV-positive and -negative patients, respectively. One-fifth of the cohort had no data on HIV status and the survival in this group was considerably lower at 77.1% (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The survival rates of South African patients accessing RRT are comparable to those in better-resourced countries. It is still unclear what effect, if any, HIV infection has on survival. Oxford University Press 2020-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7577754/ /pubmed/33124999 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfaa012 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Original Articles
Jardine, Thabiet
Wong, Esther
Steenkamp, Retha
Caskey, Fergus J
Davids, Mogamat Razeen
Survival of South African patients on renal replacement therapy
title Survival of South African patients on renal replacement therapy
title_full Survival of South African patients on renal replacement therapy
title_fullStr Survival of South African patients on renal replacement therapy
title_full_unstemmed Survival of South African patients on renal replacement therapy
title_short Survival of South African patients on renal replacement therapy
title_sort survival of south african patients on renal replacement therapy
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7577754/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33124999
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfaa012
work_keys_str_mv AT jardinethabiet survivalofsouthafricanpatientsonrenalreplacementtherapy
AT wongesther survivalofsouthafricanpatientsonrenalreplacementtherapy
AT steenkampretha survivalofsouthafricanpatientsonrenalreplacementtherapy
AT caskeyfergusj survivalofsouthafricanpatientsonrenalreplacementtherapy
AT davidsmogamatrazeen survivalofsouthafricanpatientsonrenalreplacementtherapy