Cargando…

External Validation of the Core Obesity Model to Assess the Cost-Effectiveness of Weight Management Interventions

BACKGROUND: For economic models to be considered fit for purpose, it is vital that their outputs can be interpreted with confidence by clinicians, budget holders and other stakeholders. Consequently, thorough validation of models should be carried out to enhance confidence in their predictions. Here...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lopes, Sandra, Johansen, Pierre, Lamotte, Mark, McEwan, Phil, Olivieri, Anamaria-Vera, Foos, Volker
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7578171/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32656686
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40273-020-00941-3
_version_ 1783598308353114112
author Lopes, Sandra
Johansen, Pierre
Lamotte, Mark
McEwan, Phil
Olivieri, Anamaria-Vera
Foos, Volker
author_facet Lopes, Sandra
Johansen, Pierre
Lamotte, Mark
McEwan, Phil
Olivieri, Anamaria-Vera
Foos, Volker
author_sort Lopes, Sandra
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: For economic models to be considered fit for purpose, it is vital that their outputs can be interpreted with confidence by clinicians, budget holders and other stakeholders. Consequently, thorough validation of models should be carried out to enhance confidence in their predictions. Here, we present results of external dependent and independent validations of the Core Obesity Model (COM), which was developed to assess the cost-effectiveness of weight management interventions. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to assess the external validity of the COM (version 6.1), in line with best practice guidance from the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research and the Society for Medical Decision Making. METHODS: For validation, suitable sources and outcomes were identified, and used to populate the COM with relevant inputs to allow prediction of study outcomes. Study characteristics were entered into the COM to replicate either the studies used to develop the model (dependent validation) or those not included in the model (independent validation). The concordance between predicted and observed outcomes was then assessed using established statistical methods and generation of mean error estimates. RESULTS: For most outcomes, the predictions of the COM showed good linear correlation with observed outcomes, as evidenced by the high coefficients of determination (R(2) values). The independent validation revealed a degree of underestimation in predictions of cardiovascular (CV) disease and mortality, and type 2 diabetes. CONCLUSION: The predictions generated by the risk equations used in the COM showed good concordance both with the studies used to develop the model and with studies not included in the model. In particular, the concordance observed in the external dependent validation suggests that the COM accurately predicts obesity-related event rates observed in the studies used to develop the model. However, the impact of existing CV risk, as well as mortality, is a key area for future refinement of the COM. Our results should increase confidence in the estimates derived from the COM and reduce uncertainty associated with analyses using this model. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40273-020-00941-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7578171
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75781712020-10-27 External Validation of the Core Obesity Model to Assess the Cost-Effectiveness of Weight Management Interventions Lopes, Sandra Johansen, Pierre Lamotte, Mark McEwan, Phil Olivieri, Anamaria-Vera Foos, Volker Pharmacoeconomics Original Research Article BACKGROUND: For economic models to be considered fit for purpose, it is vital that their outputs can be interpreted with confidence by clinicians, budget holders and other stakeholders. Consequently, thorough validation of models should be carried out to enhance confidence in their predictions. Here, we present results of external dependent and independent validations of the Core Obesity Model (COM), which was developed to assess the cost-effectiveness of weight management interventions. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to assess the external validity of the COM (version 6.1), in line with best practice guidance from the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research and the Society for Medical Decision Making. METHODS: For validation, suitable sources and outcomes were identified, and used to populate the COM with relevant inputs to allow prediction of study outcomes. Study characteristics were entered into the COM to replicate either the studies used to develop the model (dependent validation) or those not included in the model (independent validation). The concordance between predicted and observed outcomes was then assessed using established statistical methods and generation of mean error estimates. RESULTS: For most outcomes, the predictions of the COM showed good linear correlation with observed outcomes, as evidenced by the high coefficients of determination (R(2) values). The independent validation revealed a degree of underestimation in predictions of cardiovascular (CV) disease and mortality, and type 2 diabetes. CONCLUSION: The predictions generated by the risk equations used in the COM showed good concordance both with the studies used to develop the model and with studies not included in the model. In particular, the concordance observed in the external dependent validation suggests that the COM accurately predicts obesity-related event rates observed in the studies used to develop the model. However, the impact of existing CV risk, as well as mortality, is a key area for future refinement of the COM. Our results should increase confidence in the estimates derived from the COM and reduce uncertainty associated with analyses using this model. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40273-020-00941-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2020-07-13 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7578171/ /pubmed/32656686 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40273-020-00941-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Lopes, Sandra
Johansen, Pierre
Lamotte, Mark
McEwan, Phil
Olivieri, Anamaria-Vera
Foos, Volker
External Validation of the Core Obesity Model to Assess the Cost-Effectiveness of Weight Management Interventions
title External Validation of the Core Obesity Model to Assess the Cost-Effectiveness of Weight Management Interventions
title_full External Validation of the Core Obesity Model to Assess the Cost-Effectiveness of Weight Management Interventions
title_fullStr External Validation of the Core Obesity Model to Assess the Cost-Effectiveness of Weight Management Interventions
title_full_unstemmed External Validation of the Core Obesity Model to Assess the Cost-Effectiveness of Weight Management Interventions
title_short External Validation of the Core Obesity Model to Assess the Cost-Effectiveness of Weight Management Interventions
title_sort external validation of the core obesity model to assess the cost-effectiveness of weight management interventions
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7578171/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32656686
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40273-020-00941-3
work_keys_str_mv AT lopessandra externalvalidationofthecoreobesitymodeltoassessthecosteffectivenessofweightmanagementinterventions
AT johansenpierre externalvalidationofthecoreobesitymodeltoassessthecosteffectivenessofweightmanagementinterventions
AT lamottemark externalvalidationofthecoreobesitymodeltoassessthecosteffectivenessofweightmanagementinterventions
AT mcewanphil externalvalidationofthecoreobesitymodeltoassessthecosteffectivenessofweightmanagementinterventions
AT olivierianamariavera externalvalidationofthecoreobesitymodeltoassessthecosteffectivenessofweightmanagementinterventions
AT foosvolker externalvalidationofthecoreobesitymodeltoassessthecosteffectivenessofweightmanagementinterventions