Cargando…
Physical Management of Scar Tissue: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Objective: The aim of this systematic review with meta-analysis was to describe the status on the effects of physical scar treatments on pain, pigmentation, pliability, pruritus, scar thickening, and surface area. Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Subjects: Adults with any kind of scar ti...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7578190/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32589450 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/acm.2020.0109 |
_version_ | 1783598310668369920 |
---|---|
author | Deflorin, Carlina Hohenauer, Erich Stoop, Rahel van Daele, Ulrike Clijsen, Ron Taeymans, Jan |
author_facet | Deflorin, Carlina Hohenauer, Erich Stoop, Rahel van Daele, Ulrike Clijsen, Ron Taeymans, Jan |
author_sort | Deflorin, Carlina |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective: The aim of this systematic review with meta-analysis was to describe the status on the effects of physical scar treatments on pain, pigmentation, pliability, pruritus, scar thickening, and surface area. Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Subjects: Adults with any kind of scar tissue. Interventions: Physical scar management versus control or no scar management. Outcome measures: Pain, pigmentation, pliability, pruritus, surface area, scar thickness. Results: The overall results revealed that physical scar management is beneficial compared with the control treatment regarding the management of pain (p = 0.012), pruritus (p < 0.001), pigmentation (p = 0.010), pliability (p < 0.001), surface area (p < 0.001), and thickness (p = 0.022) of scar tissue in adults. The observed risk of bias was high for blinding of participants and personnel (47%) and low for other bias (100%). Conclusions: Physical scar management demonstrates moderate-to-strong effects on improvement of scar issues as related to signs and symptoms. These results show the importance of specific physical management of scar tissue. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7578190 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75781902020-10-22 Physical Management of Scar Tissue: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Deflorin, Carlina Hohenauer, Erich Stoop, Rahel van Daele, Ulrike Clijsen, Ron Taeymans, Jan J Altern Complement Med Review Articles Objective: The aim of this systematic review with meta-analysis was to describe the status on the effects of physical scar treatments on pain, pigmentation, pliability, pruritus, scar thickening, and surface area. Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Subjects: Adults with any kind of scar tissue. Interventions: Physical scar management versus control or no scar management. Outcome measures: Pain, pigmentation, pliability, pruritus, surface area, scar thickness. Results: The overall results revealed that physical scar management is beneficial compared with the control treatment regarding the management of pain (p = 0.012), pruritus (p < 0.001), pigmentation (p = 0.010), pliability (p < 0.001), surface area (p < 0.001), and thickness (p = 0.022) of scar tissue in adults. The observed risk of bias was high for blinding of participants and personnel (47%) and low for other bias (100%). Conclusions: Physical scar management demonstrates moderate-to-strong effects on improvement of scar issues as related to signs and symptoms. These results show the importance of specific physical management of scar tissue. Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2020-10-01 2020-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7578190/ /pubmed/32589450 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/acm.2020.0109 Text en © Carlina Deflorin et al. 2020; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. This Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Articles Deflorin, Carlina Hohenauer, Erich Stoop, Rahel van Daele, Ulrike Clijsen, Ron Taeymans, Jan Physical Management of Scar Tissue: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title | Physical Management of Scar Tissue: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Physical Management of Scar Tissue: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Physical Management of Scar Tissue: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Physical Management of Scar Tissue: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Physical Management of Scar Tissue: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | physical management of scar tissue: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Review Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7578190/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32589450 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/acm.2020.0109 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT deflorincarlina physicalmanagementofscartissueasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT hohenauererich physicalmanagementofscartissueasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT stooprahel physicalmanagementofscartissueasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT vandaeleulrike physicalmanagementofscartissueasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT clijsenron physicalmanagementofscartissueasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT taeymansjan physicalmanagementofscartissueasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |