Cargando…

Physical Management of Scar Tissue: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objective: The aim of this systematic review with meta-analysis was to describe the status on the effects of physical scar treatments on pain, pigmentation, pliability, pruritus, scar thickening, and surface area. Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Subjects: Adults with any kind of scar ti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Deflorin, Carlina, Hohenauer, Erich, Stoop, Rahel, van Daele, Ulrike, Clijsen, Ron, Taeymans, Jan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7578190/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32589450
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/acm.2020.0109
_version_ 1783598310668369920
author Deflorin, Carlina
Hohenauer, Erich
Stoop, Rahel
van Daele, Ulrike
Clijsen, Ron
Taeymans, Jan
author_facet Deflorin, Carlina
Hohenauer, Erich
Stoop, Rahel
van Daele, Ulrike
Clijsen, Ron
Taeymans, Jan
author_sort Deflorin, Carlina
collection PubMed
description Objective: The aim of this systematic review with meta-analysis was to describe the status on the effects of physical scar treatments on pain, pigmentation, pliability, pruritus, scar thickening, and surface area. Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Subjects: Adults with any kind of scar tissue. Interventions: Physical scar management versus control or no scar management. Outcome measures: Pain, pigmentation, pliability, pruritus, surface area, scar thickness. Results: The overall results revealed that physical scar management is beneficial compared with the control treatment regarding the management of pain (p = 0.012), pruritus (p < 0.001), pigmentation (p = 0.010), pliability (p < 0.001), surface area (p < 0.001), and thickness (p = 0.022) of scar tissue in adults. The observed risk of bias was high for blinding of participants and personnel (47%) and low for other bias (100%). Conclusions: Physical scar management demonstrates moderate-to-strong effects on improvement of scar issues as related to signs and symptoms. These results show the importance of specific physical management of scar tissue.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7578190
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75781902020-10-22 Physical Management of Scar Tissue: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Deflorin, Carlina Hohenauer, Erich Stoop, Rahel van Daele, Ulrike Clijsen, Ron Taeymans, Jan J Altern Complement Med Review Articles Objective: The aim of this systematic review with meta-analysis was to describe the status on the effects of physical scar treatments on pain, pigmentation, pliability, pruritus, scar thickening, and surface area. Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Subjects: Adults with any kind of scar tissue. Interventions: Physical scar management versus control or no scar management. Outcome measures: Pain, pigmentation, pliability, pruritus, surface area, scar thickness. Results: The overall results revealed that physical scar management is beneficial compared with the control treatment regarding the management of pain (p = 0.012), pruritus (p < 0.001), pigmentation (p = 0.010), pliability (p < 0.001), surface area (p < 0.001), and thickness (p = 0.022) of scar tissue in adults. The observed risk of bias was high for blinding of participants and personnel (47%) and low for other bias (100%). Conclusions: Physical scar management demonstrates moderate-to-strong effects on improvement of scar issues as related to signs and symptoms. These results show the importance of specific physical management of scar tissue. Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2020-10-01 2020-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7578190/ /pubmed/32589450 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/acm.2020.0109 Text en © Carlina Deflorin et al. 2020; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. This Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Articles
Deflorin, Carlina
Hohenauer, Erich
Stoop, Rahel
van Daele, Ulrike
Clijsen, Ron
Taeymans, Jan
Physical Management of Scar Tissue: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Physical Management of Scar Tissue: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Physical Management of Scar Tissue: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Physical Management of Scar Tissue: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Physical Management of Scar Tissue: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Physical Management of Scar Tissue: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort physical management of scar tissue: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7578190/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32589450
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/acm.2020.0109
work_keys_str_mv AT deflorincarlina physicalmanagementofscartissueasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hohenauererich physicalmanagementofscartissueasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT stooprahel physicalmanagementofscartissueasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT vandaeleulrike physicalmanagementofscartissueasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT clijsenron physicalmanagementofscartissueasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT taeymansjan physicalmanagementofscartissueasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis