Cargando…

The effectiveness of preemptive analgesia for relieving postoperative pain after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS): a prospective, non-randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of preemptive analgesia (PA) for relieving postoperative pain and reducing the side effects of analgesics following video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) has not yet been determined. This study intends to test the clinical application value of PA in the perioperat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kong, Min, Li, Xiaodong, Shen, Jianfei, Ye, Minhua, Xiang, Haifei, Ma, Dehua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7578504/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33145067
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-20-2500
_version_ 1783598381004750848
author Kong, Min
Li, Xiaodong
Shen, Jianfei
Ye, Minhua
Xiang, Haifei
Ma, Dehua
author_facet Kong, Min
Li, Xiaodong
Shen, Jianfei
Ye, Minhua
Xiang, Haifei
Ma, Dehua
author_sort Kong, Min
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of preemptive analgesia (PA) for relieving postoperative pain and reducing the side effects of analgesics following video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) has not yet been determined. This study intends to test the clinical application value of PA in the perioperative period of VATS. METHODS: From January 2018 to August 2018, we divided patients who underwent VATS in our hospital into a trial group (PA group) and a control group (traditional analgesia group, TA group). The PA group received a PA program, and the TA group was administered a conventional postoperative analgesia scheme. We compared the two groups according to the intensity of postoperative pain using the numeric rating scale (NRS), the incidence rate of analgesic drug-related adverse reactions, and the severity of stress-induced inflammation. RESULTS: One hundred five cases from the PA group, and 80 cases from the TA group were included in the analysis. There were no significant differences between the two groups in baseline characteristics (P>0.05). The PA group had a lower incidence rate of side effects from the analgesics compared to the TA group, and there was a statistical difference at 48 and 72 hours after surgery (P<0.05). The PA group had a slightly lower score than the TA group for postoperative resting pain. However, this difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). The motion pain NRS score of the PA group was lower than the TA group, and although there were no significant differences at 4, 24, and 48 hours (P>0.05), there was a statistically significant difference at 72 hours (P<0.05). In the subset of patients with motion pain NRS ≥3 points, the PA group was marginally higher than the TA group at 4 hours (P>0.05) but was lower than the TA group at 24, 48, and 72 hours, with a statistically significant difference at 24 and 72 hours (P<0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in perioperative stress indexes between the two groups (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: PA can relieve postoperative pain following VATS and reduce the incidence rate of analgesic drug-related adverse effects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7578504
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75785042020-11-02 The effectiveness of preemptive analgesia for relieving postoperative pain after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS): a prospective, non-randomized controlled trial Kong, Min Li, Xiaodong Shen, Jianfei Ye, Minhua Xiang, Haifei Ma, Dehua J Thorac Dis Original Article BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of preemptive analgesia (PA) for relieving postoperative pain and reducing the side effects of analgesics following video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) has not yet been determined. This study intends to test the clinical application value of PA in the perioperative period of VATS. METHODS: From January 2018 to August 2018, we divided patients who underwent VATS in our hospital into a trial group (PA group) and a control group (traditional analgesia group, TA group). The PA group received a PA program, and the TA group was administered a conventional postoperative analgesia scheme. We compared the two groups according to the intensity of postoperative pain using the numeric rating scale (NRS), the incidence rate of analgesic drug-related adverse reactions, and the severity of stress-induced inflammation. RESULTS: One hundred five cases from the PA group, and 80 cases from the TA group were included in the analysis. There were no significant differences between the two groups in baseline characteristics (P>0.05). The PA group had a lower incidence rate of side effects from the analgesics compared to the TA group, and there was a statistical difference at 48 and 72 hours after surgery (P<0.05). The PA group had a slightly lower score than the TA group for postoperative resting pain. However, this difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). The motion pain NRS score of the PA group was lower than the TA group, and although there were no significant differences at 4, 24, and 48 hours (P>0.05), there was a statistically significant difference at 72 hours (P<0.05). In the subset of patients with motion pain NRS ≥3 points, the PA group was marginally higher than the TA group at 4 hours (P>0.05) but was lower than the TA group at 24, 48, and 72 hours, with a statistically significant difference at 24 and 72 hours (P<0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in perioperative stress indexes between the two groups (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: PA can relieve postoperative pain following VATS and reduce the incidence rate of analgesic drug-related adverse effects. AME Publishing Company 2020-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7578504/ /pubmed/33145067 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-20-2500 Text en 2020 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Kong, Min
Li, Xiaodong
Shen, Jianfei
Ye, Minhua
Xiang, Haifei
Ma, Dehua
The effectiveness of preemptive analgesia for relieving postoperative pain after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS): a prospective, non-randomized controlled trial
title The effectiveness of preemptive analgesia for relieving postoperative pain after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS): a prospective, non-randomized controlled trial
title_full The effectiveness of preemptive analgesia for relieving postoperative pain after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS): a prospective, non-randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr The effectiveness of preemptive analgesia for relieving postoperative pain after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS): a prospective, non-randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed The effectiveness of preemptive analgesia for relieving postoperative pain after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS): a prospective, non-randomized controlled trial
title_short The effectiveness of preemptive analgesia for relieving postoperative pain after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS): a prospective, non-randomized controlled trial
title_sort effectiveness of preemptive analgesia for relieving postoperative pain after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (vats): a prospective, non-randomized controlled trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7578504/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33145067
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-20-2500
work_keys_str_mv AT kongmin theeffectivenessofpreemptiveanalgesiaforrelievingpostoperativepainaftervideoassistedthoracoscopicsurgeryvatsaprospectivenonrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lixiaodong theeffectivenessofpreemptiveanalgesiaforrelievingpostoperativepainaftervideoassistedthoracoscopicsurgeryvatsaprospectivenonrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT shenjianfei theeffectivenessofpreemptiveanalgesiaforrelievingpostoperativepainaftervideoassistedthoracoscopicsurgeryvatsaprospectivenonrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT yeminhua theeffectivenessofpreemptiveanalgesiaforrelievingpostoperativepainaftervideoassistedthoracoscopicsurgeryvatsaprospectivenonrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT xianghaifei theeffectivenessofpreemptiveanalgesiaforrelievingpostoperativepainaftervideoassistedthoracoscopicsurgeryvatsaprospectivenonrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT madehua theeffectivenessofpreemptiveanalgesiaforrelievingpostoperativepainaftervideoassistedthoracoscopicsurgeryvatsaprospectivenonrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kongmin effectivenessofpreemptiveanalgesiaforrelievingpostoperativepainaftervideoassistedthoracoscopicsurgeryvatsaprospectivenonrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lixiaodong effectivenessofpreemptiveanalgesiaforrelievingpostoperativepainaftervideoassistedthoracoscopicsurgeryvatsaprospectivenonrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT shenjianfei effectivenessofpreemptiveanalgesiaforrelievingpostoperativepainaftervideoassistedthoracoscopicsurgeryvatsaprospectivenonrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT yeminhua effectivenessofpreemptiveanalgesiaforrelievingpostoperativepainaftervideoassistedthoracoscopicsurgeryvatsaprospectivenonrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT xianghaifei effectivenessofpreemptiveanalgesiaforrelievingpostoperativepainaftervideoassistedthoracoscopicsurgeryvatsaprospectivenonrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT madehua effectivenessofpreemptiveanalgesiaforrelievingpostoperativepainaftervideoassistedthoracoscopicsurgeryvatsaprospectivenonrandomizedcontrolledtrial