Cargando…
Validation of a method to quantify microfibres present in aquatic surface microlayers
Many of the methods for microplastics quantification in the environment are criticised creating problems with data validity. Quantification of microplastics in the surface microlayer of aquatic environments using glass plate dipping holds promise as a simple field method, but its efficiency has yet...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7578636/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33087751 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-74635-3 |
_version_ | 1783598409400188928 |
---|---|
author | Birkenhead, Joshua Radford, Freya Stead, Jessica L. Cundy, Andrew B. Hudson, Malcolm D. |
author_facet | Birkenhead, Joshua Radford, Freya Stead, Jessica L. Cundy, Andrew B. Hudson, Malcolm D. |
author_sort | Birkenhead, Joshua |
collection | PubMed |
description | Many of the methods for microplastics quantification in the environment are criticised creating problems with data validity. Quantification of microplastics in the surface microlayer of aquatic environments using glass plate dipping holds promise as a simple field method, but its efficiency has yet to be validated. We tested a standard glass plate dipping method to assess recovery of four common polymer microfibres and two common natural fibres, under three different salinities (freshwater, brackish water, saltwater). Overall recovery rates were low (26.8 ± 1.54%) but higher recoveries were observed under saltwater treatments (36.5 ± 3.01%) than brackish water (24.5 ± 1.92%) or freshwater (19.3 ± 1.92%). The fibre types showed different recovery rates, with acrylic yielding significantly higher recovery rates (37.0 ± 2.71%) than other fibres across treatments. No clear relationship between the density of the fibres and the recovery efficiency was seen. We suggest that, where this method is used for monitoring microplastics, the results will typically underestimate the total amount present, but that recovery is sufficiently consistent to allow comparison of differences between sampling locations. When comparing data across river-estuarine or similar transects salinity should be monitored to account for salinity-induced differences in sampling recovery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7578636 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75786362020-10-23 Validation of a method to quantify microfibres present in aquatic surface microlayers Birkenhead, Joshua Radford, Freya Stead, Jessica L. Cundy, Andrew B. Hudson, Malcolm D. Sci Rep Article Many of the methods for microplastics quantification in the environment are criticised creating problems with data validity. Quantification of microplastics in the surface microlayer of aquatic environments using glass plate dipping holds promise as a simple field method, but its efficiency has yet to be validated. We tested a standard glass plate dipping method to assess recovery of four common polymer microfibres and two common natural fibres, under three different salinities (freshwater, brackish water, saltwater). Overall recovery rates were low (26.8 ± 1.54%) but higher recoveries were observed under saltwater treatments (36.5 ± 3.01%) than brackish water (24.5 ± 1.92%) or freshwater (19.3 ± 1.92%). The fibre types showed different recovery rates, with acrylic yielding significantly higher recovery rates (37.0 ± 2.71%) than other fibres across treatments. No clear relationship between the density of the fibres and the recovery efficiency was seen. We suggest that, where this method is used for monitoring microplastics, the results will typically underestimate the total amount present, but that recovery is sufficiently consistent to allow comparison of differences between sampling locations. When comparing data across river-estuarine or similar transects salinity should be monitored to account for salinity-induced differences in sampling recovery. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7578636/ /pubmed/33087751 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-74635-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Birkenhead, Joshua Radford, Freya Stead, Jessica L. Cundy, Andrew B. Hudson, Malcolm D. Validation of a method to quantify microfibres present in aquatic surface microlayers |
title | Validation of a method to quantify microfibres present in aquatic surface microlayers |
title_full | Validation of a method to quantify microfibres present in aquatic surface microlayers |
title_fullStr | Validation of a method to quantify microfibres present in aquatic surface microlayers |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of a method to quantify microfibres present in aquatic surface microlayers |
title_short | Validation of a method to quantify microfibres present in aquatic surface microlayers |
title_sort | validation of a method to quantify microfibres present in aquatic surface microlayers |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7578636/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33087751 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-74635-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT birkenheadjoshua validationofamethodtoquantifymicrofibrespresentinaquaticsurfacemicrolayers AT radfordfreya validationofamethodtoquantifymicrofibrespresentinaquaticsurfacemicrolayers AT steadjessical validationofamethodtoquantifymicrofibrespresentinaquaticsurfacemicrolayers AT cundyandrewb validationofamethodtoquantifymicrofibrespresentinaquaticsurfacemicrolayers AT hudsonmalcolmd validationofamethodtoquantifymicrofibrespresentinaquaticsurfacemicrolayers |