Cargando…

Validation of a method to quantify microfibres present in aquatic surface microlayers

Many of the methods for microplastics quantification in the environment are criticised creating problems with data validity. Quantification of microplastics in the surface microlayer of aquatic environments using glass plate dipping holds promise as a simple field method, but its efficiency has yet...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Birkenhead, Joshua, Radford, Freya, Stead, Jessica L., Cundy, Andrew B., Hudson, Malcolm D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7578636/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33087751
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-74635-3
_version_ 1783598409400188928
author Birkenhead, Joshua
Radford, Freya
Stead, Jessica L.
Cundy, Andrew B.
Hudson, Malcolm D.
author_facet Birkenhead, Joshua
Radford, Freya
Stead, Jessica L.
Cundy, Andrew B.
Hudson, Malcolm D.
author_sort Birkenhead, Joshua
collection PubMed
description Many of the methods for microplastics quantification in the environment are criticised creating problems with data validity. Quantification of microplastics in the surface microlayer of aquatic environments using glass plate dipping holds promise as a simple field method, but its efficiency has yet to be validated. We tested a standard glass plate dipping method to assess recovery of four common polymer microfibres and two common natural fibres, under three different salinities (freshwater, brackish water, saltwater). Overall recovery rates were low (26.8 ± 1.54%) but higher recoveries were observed under saltwater treatments (36.5 ± 3.01%) than brackish water (24.5 ± 1.92%) or freshwater (19.3 ± 1.92%). The fibre types showed different recovery rates, with acrylic yielding significantly higher recovery rates (37.0 ± 2.71%) than other fibres across treatments. No clear relationship between the density of the fibres and the recovery efficiency was seen. We suggest that, where this method is used for monitoring microplastics, the results will typically underestimate the total amount present, but that recovery is sufficiently consistent to allow comparison of differences between sampling locations. When comparing data across river-estuarine or similar transects salinity should be monitored to account for salinity-induced differences in sampling recovery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7578636
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75786362020-10-23 Validation of a method to quantify microfibres present in aquatic surface microlayers Birkenhead, Joshua Radford, Freya Stead, Jessica L. Cundy, Andrew B. Hudson, Malcolm D. Sci Rep Article Many of the methods for microplastics quantification in the environment are criticised creating problems with data validity. Quantification of microplastics in the surface microlayer of aquatic environments using glass plate dipping holds promise as a simple field method, but its efficiency has yet to be validated. We tested a standard glass plate dipping method to assess recovery of four common polymer microfibres and two common natural fibres, under three different salinities (freshwater, brackish water, saltwater). Overall recovery rates were low (26.8 ± 1.54%) but higher recoveries were observed under saltwater treatments (36.5 ± 3.01%) than brackish water (24.5 ± 1.92%) or freshwater (19.3 ± 1.92%). The fibre types showed different recovery rates, with acrylic yielding significantly higher recovery rates (37.0 ± 2.71%) than other fibres across treatments. No clear relationship between the density of the fibres and the recovery efficiency was seen. We suggest that, where this method is used for monitoring microplastics, the results will typically underestimate the total amount present, but that recovery is sufficiently consistent to allow comparison of differences between sampling locations. When comparing data across river-estuarine or similar transects salinity should be monitored to account for salinity-induced differences in sampling recovery. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7578636/ /pubmed/33087751 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-74635-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Birkenhead, Joshua
Radford, Freya
Stead, Jessica L.
Cundy, Andrew B.
Hudson, Malcolm D.
Validation of a method to quantify microfibres present in aquatic surface microlayers
title Validation of a method to quantify microfibres present in aquatic surface microlayers
title_full Validation of a method to quantify microfibres present in aquatic surface microlayers
title_fullStr Validation of a method to quantify microfibres present in aquatic surface microlayers
title_full_unstemmed Validation of a method to quantify microfibres present in aquatic surface microlayers
title_short Validation of a method to quantify microfibres present in aquatic surface microlayers
title_sort validation of a method to quantify microfibres present in aquatic surface microlayers
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7578636/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33087751
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-74635-3
work_keys_str_mv AT birkenheadjoshua validationofamethodtoquantifymicrofibrespresentinaquaticsurfacemicrolayers
AT radfordfreya validationofamethodtoquantifymicrofibrespresentinaquaticsurfacemicrolayers
AT steadjessical validationofamethodtoquantifymicrofibrespresentinaquaticsurfacemicrolayers
AT cundyandrewb validationofamethodtoquantifymicrofibrespresentinaquaticsurfacemicrolayers
AT hudsonmalcolmd validationofamethodtoquantifymicrofibrespresentinaquaticsurfacemicrolayers