Cargando…

Use of Neurodynamic or Orthopedic Tension Tests for the Diagnosis of Lumbar and Lumbosacral Radiculopathies: Study of the Diagnostic Validity

Background: Lumbar radiculopathy is a nerve root disorder whose correct diagnosis is essential. The objective of the present study was to analyze the reliability diagnostic validity of eight neurodynamic and/or orthopedic tension tests using magnetic resonance imaging as the Gold Standard. Methods:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: González Espinosa de los Monteros, Francisco Javier, Gonzalez-Medina, Gloria, Ardila, Elisa Maria Garrido, Mansilla, Juan Rodríguez, Expósito, José Paz, Ruiz, Petronila Oliva
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7579046/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32993094
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17197046
_version_ 1783598498215624704
author González Espinosa de los Monteros, Francisco Javier
Gonzalez-Medina, Gloria
Ardila, Elisa Maria Garrido
Mansilla, Juan Rodríguez
Expósito, José Paz
Ruiz, Petronila Oliva
author_facet González Espinosa de los Monteros, Francisco Javier
Gonzalez-Medina, Gloria
Ardila, Elisa Maria Garrido
Mansilla, Juan Rodríguez
Expósito, José Paz
Ruiz, Petronila Oliva
author_sort González Espinosa de los Monteros, Francisco Javier
collection PubMed
description Background: Lumbar radiculopathy is a nerve root disorder whose correct diagnosis is essential. The objective of the present study was to analyze the reliability diagnostic validity of eight neurodynamic and/or orthopedic tension tests using magnetic resonance imaging as the Gold Standard. Methods: An epidemiological study of randomized consecutive cases which was observational, descriptive, transversal, double blinded and was conducted following the Standards for Reporting Diagnostic accuracy studies (STARD) declaration. The sample size was 864 participants. Internal and external validity (CI = 95%) and reliability, were calculated for all tests performed independently. The diagnostic validity of the combined and multiple tests in parallel was also calculated. Results: The analysis indicated that only two tests performed independently had external validity, but neither had reliability or precision. The Straight Leg Raise test and the Bragard test performed in a multiple parallel way showed high sensitivity (97.40%), high negative predictive value (PV− 96.64%) and external validity (Likelihood Ratio− 0.05). The combined test of the Slump test and the Dejerine’s triad had internal and external validity. Conclusions: The Straight Leg Raise test and the Bragard test performed in a multiple parallel way and the combined test of the Slump Test and the Dejerine’s triad have clinical validity to discard lumbar or lumbar-sacral radiculopathy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7579046
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75790462020-10-29 Use of Neurodynamic or Orthopedic Tension Tests for the Diagnosis of Lumbar and Lumbosacral Radiculopathies: Study of the Diagnostic Validity González Espinosa de los Monteros, Francisco Javier Gonzalez-Medina, Gloria Ardila, Elisa Maria Garrido Mansilla, Juan Rodríguez Expósito, José Paz Ruiz, Petronila Oliva Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Background: Lumbar radiculopathy is a nerve root disorder whose correct diagnosis is essential. The objective of the present study was to analyze the reliability diagnostic validity of eight neurodynamic and/or orthopedic tension tests using magnetic resonance imaging as the Gold Standard. Methods: An epidemiological study of randomized consecutive cases which was observational, descriptive, transversal, double blinded and was conducted following the Standards for Reporting Diagnostic accuracy studies (STARD) declaration. The sample size was 864 participants. Internal and external validity (CI = 95%) and reliability, were calculated for all tests performed independently. The diagnostic validity of the combined and multiple tests in parallel was also calculated. Results: The analysis indicated that only two tests performed independently had external validity, but neither had reliability or precision. The Straight Leg Raise test and the Bragard test performed in a multiple parallel way showed high sensitivity (97.40%), high negative predictive value (PV− 96.64%) and external validity (Likelihood Ratio− 0.05). The combined test of the Slump test and the Dejerine’s triad had internal and external validity. Conclusions: The Straight Leg Raise test and the Bragard test performed in a multiple parallel way and the combined test of the Slump Test and the Dejerine’s triad have clinical validity to discard lumbar or lumbar-sacral radiculopathy. MDPI 2020-09-26 2020-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7579046/ /pubmed/32993094 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17197046 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
González Espinosa de los Monteros, Francisco Javier
Gonzalez-Medina, Gloria
Ardila, Elisa Maria Garrido
Mansilla, Juan Rodríguez
Expósito, José Paz
Ruiz, Petronila Oliva
Use of Neurodynamic or Orthopedic Tension Tests for the Diagnosis of Lumbar and Lumbosacral Radiculopathies: Study of the Diagnostic Validity
title Use of Neurodynamic or Orthopedic Tension Tests for the Diagnosis of Lumbar and Lumbosacral Radiculopathies: Study of the Diagnostic Validity
title_full Use of Neurodynamic or Orthopedic Tension Tests for the Diagnosis of Lumbar and Lumbosacral Radiculopathies: Study of the Diagnostic Validity
title_fullStr Use of Neurodynamic or Orthopedic Tension Tests for the Diagnosis of Lumbar and Lumbosacral Radiculopathies: Study of the Diagnostic Validity
title_full_unstemmed Use of Neurodynamic or Orthopedic Tension Tests for the Diagnosis of Lumbar and Lumbosacral Radiculopathies: Study of the Diagnostic Validity
title_short Use of Neurodynamic or Orthopedic Tension Tests for the Diagnosis of Lumbar and Lumbosacral Radiculopathies: Study of the Diagnostic Validity
title_sort use of neurodynamic or orthopedic tension tests for the diagnosis of lumbar and lumbosacral radiculopathies: study of the diagnostic validity
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7579046/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32993094
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17197046
work_keys_str_mv AT gonzalezespinosadelosmonterosfranciscojavier useofneurodynamicororthopedictensiontestsforthediagnosisoflumbarandlumbosacralradiculopathiesstudyofthediagnosticvalidity
AT gonzalezmedinagloria useofneurodynamicororthopedictensiontestsforthediagnosisoflumbarandlumbosacralradiculopathiesstudyofthediagnosticvalidity
AT ardilaelisamariagarrido useofneurodynamicororthopedictensiontestsforthediagnosisoflumbarandlumbosacralradiculopathiesstudyofthediagnosticvalidity
AT mansillajuanrodriguez useofneurodynamicororthopedictensiontestsforthediagnosisoflumbarandlumbosacralradiculopathiesstudyofthediagnosticvalidity
AT expositojosepaz useofneurodynamicororthopedictensiontestsforthediagnosisoflumbarandlumbosacralradiculopathiesstudyofthediagnosticvalidity
AT ruizpetronilaoliva useofneurodynamicororthopedictensiontestsforthediagnosisoflumbarandlumbosacralradiculopathiesstudyofthediagnosticvalidity