Cargando…
Psychometric Properties of the Polish Version of the 36-Item WHODAS 2.0 in Patients with Low Back Pain
The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) is considered by the World Health Organization (WHO) to be a useful tool for assessing the functioning and disability of the general population as well as the effectiveness of the applied interventions. Until this study, n...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7579066/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33036141 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17197284 |
_version_ | 1783598502985596928 |
---|---|
author | Ćwirlej-Sozańska, Agnieszka Bejer, Agnieszka Wiśniowska-Szurlej, Agnieszka Wilmowska-Pietruszyńska, Anna de Sire, Alessandro Spalek, Renata Sozański, Bernard |
author_facet | Ćwirlej-Sozańska, Agnieszka Bejer, Agnieszka Wiśniowska-Szurlej, Agnieszka Wilmowska-Pietruszyńska, Anna de Sire, Alessandro Spalek, Renata Sozański, Bernard |
author_sort | Ćwirlej-Sozańska, Agnieszka |
collection | PubMed |
description | The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) is considered by the World Health Organization (WHO) to be a useful tool for assessing the functioning and disability of the general population as well as the effectiveness of the applied interventions. Until this study, no data regarding the validity of the 36-item WHODAS 2.0 in chronic low back pain (LBP) in Poland have been explored. This study was conducted on 92 patients suffering from chronic LBP admitted to the rehabilitation ward. The Polish version of the 36-item WHODAS 2.0, the Sf-36 Health Survey (SF-36), the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) questionnaires were applied to assess patients. The scale score reliability of the entire tool for the study population was very high. The Cronbach’s alpha test result for the entire scale was 0.92. For the overall result of the WHODAS 2.0, the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC(1,2)) was 0.928, which confirmed that the scale was consistent over time. The total result and the vast majority of domains of the 36-item WHODAS 2.0 correlated negatively with domains of the SF-36 questionnaire; thus, a higher WHODAS 2.0 score was associated with a lower score on the SF-36 questionnaire. We found that the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the total WHODAS 2.0 score in patients after rehabilitation for LBP was 4.87. Overall, the results indicated that the Polish version of the 36-item WHODAS is suitable for assessing health and disability status in patients with LBP. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7579066 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75790662020-10-29 Psychometric Properties of the Polish Version of the 36-Item WHODAS 2.0 in Patients with Low Back Pain Ćwirlej-Sozańska, Agnieszka Bejer, Agnieszka Wiśniowska-Szurlej, Agnieszka Wilmowska-Pietruszyńska, Anna de Sire, Alessandro Spalek, Renata Sozański, Bernard Int J Environ Res Public Health Article The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) is considered by the World Health Organization (WHO) to be a useful tool for assessing the functioning and disability of the general population as well as the effectiveness of the applied interventions. Until this study, no data regarding the validity of the 36-item WHODAS 2.0 in chronic low back pain (LBP) in Poland have been explored. This study was conducted on 92 patients suffering from chronic LBP admitted to the rehabilitation ward. The Polish version of the 36-item WHODAS 2.0, the Sf-36 Health Survey (SF-36), the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) questionnaires were applied to assess patients. The scale score reliability of the entire tool for the study population was very high. The Cronbach’s alpha test result for the entire scale was 0.92. For the overall result of the WHODAS 2.0, the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC(1,2)) was 0.928, which confirmed that the scale was consistent over time. The total result and the vast majority of domains of the 36-item WHODAS 2.0 correlated negatively with domains of the SF-36 questionnaire; thus, a higher WHODAS 2.0 score was associated with a lower score on the SF-36 questionnaire. We found that the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the total WHODAS 2.0 score in patients after rehabilitation for LBP was 4.87. Overall, the results indicated that the Polish version of the 36-item WHODAS is suitable for assessing health and disability status in patients with LBP. MDPI 2020-10-06 2020-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7579066/ /pubmed/33036141 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17197284 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Ćwirlej-Sozańska, Agnieszka Bejer, Agnieszka Wiśniowska-Szurlej, Agnieszka Wilmowska-Pietruszyńska, Anna de Sire, Alessandro Spalek, Renata Sozański, Bernard Psychometric Properties of the Polish Version of the 36-Item WHODAS 2.0 in Patients with Low Back Pain |
title | Psychometric Properties of the Polish Version of the 36-Item WHODAS 2.0 in Patients with Low Back Pain |
title_full | Psychometric Properties of the Polish Version of the 36-Item WHODAS 2.0 in Patients with Low Back Pain |
title_fullStr | Psychometric Properties of the Polish Version of the 36-Item WHODAS 2.0 in Patients with Low Back Pain |
title_full_unstemmed | Psychometric Properties of the Polish Version of the 36-Item WHODAS 2.0 in Patients with Low Back Pain |
title_short | Psychometric Properties of the Polish Version of the 36-Item WHODAS 2.0 in Patients with Low Back Pain |
title_sort | psychometric properties of the polish version of the 36-item whodas 2.0 in patients with low back pain |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7579066/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33036141 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17197284 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cwirlejsozanskaagnieszka psychometricpropertiesofthepolishversionofthe36itemwhodas20inpatientswithlowbackpain AT bejeragnieszka psychometricpropertiesofthepolishversionofthe36itemwhodas20inpatientswithlowbackpain AT wisniowskaszurlejagnieszka psychometricpropertiesofthepolishversionofthe36itemwhodas20inpatientswithlowbackpain AT wilmowskapietruszynskaanna psychometricpropertiesofthepolishversionofthe36itemwhodas20inpatientswithlowbackpain AT desirealessandro psychometricpropertiesofthepolishversionofthe36itemwhodas20inpatientswithlowbackpain AT spalekrenata psychometricpropertiesofthepolishversionofthe36itemwhodas20inpatientswithlowbackpain AT sozanskibernard psychometricpropertiesofthepolishversionofthe36itemwhodas20inpatientswithlowbackpain |