Cargando…
Comparison between Gradual Reduced Nicotine Content and Usual Nicotine Content Groups on Subjective Cigarette Ratings in a Randomized Double-Blind Trial
In 2018, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued an advanced notice of proposed rulemaking to reduce nicotine in tobacco products to produce a minimally addictive or nonaddictive effect, but there was a research gap in the subjective responses of reduced-nicotine-content cigarett...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7579069/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32993116 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17197047 |
_version_ | 1783598503664025600 |
---|---|
author | Lin, Wenxue Krebs, Nicolle M. Zhu, Junjia Foulds, Jonathan Horn, Kimberly Muscat, Joshua E. |
author_facet | Lin, Wenxue Krebs, Nicolle M. Zhu, Junjia Foulds, Jonathan Horn, Kimberly Muscat, Joshua E. |
author_sort | Lin, Wenxue |
collection | PubMed |
description | In 2018, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued an advanced notice of proposed rulemaking to reduce nicotine in tobacco products to produce a minimally addictive or nonaddictive effect, but there was a research gap in the subjective responses of reduced-nicotine-content cigarettes. We compared the responses of the modified cigarette evaluation questionnaire (mCEQ) and cigarette-liking scale (CLS) between the gradually reduced nicotine content (RNC) group and the usual nicotine content (UNC) group. Linear mixed-effects models for repeated measures were used to analyze and compare the change over time for the mCEQ and CLS across the two treatment groups (RNC and UNC). We found that the change over time for the mCEQ and CLS was significant between the RNC and the UNC treatment groups at the beginning of visit 6 with 1.4 mg nicotine/cigarette. At visits 8 and 9, the RNC group reported significantly lower satisfaction scores compared to UNC. Subscale analysis showed that smoking satisfaction decreased in RNC while other measures, such as cigarette enjoyment, did not change. Understanding the impact of nicotine reduction on cigarette subjective responses through evaluation and liking scales would provide valuable information to the FDA on nicotine reduction policies for cigarettes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7579069 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75790692020-10-29 Comparison between Gradual Reduced Nicotine Content and Usual Nicotine Content Groups on Subjective Cigarette Ratings in a Randomized Double-Blind Trial Lin, Wenxue Krebs, Nicolle M. Zhu, Junjia Foulds, Jonathan Horn, Kimberly Muscat, Joshua E. Int J Environ Res Public Health Article In 2018, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued an advanced notice of proposed rulemaking to reduce nicotine in tobacco products to produce a minimally addictive or nonaddictive effect, but there was a research gap in the subjective responses of reduced-nicotine-content cigarettes. We compared the responses of the modified cigarette evaluation questionnaire (mCEQ) and cigarette-liking scale (CLS) between the gradually reduced nicotine content (RNC) group and the usual nicotine content (UNC) group. Linear mixed-effects models for repeated measures were used to analyze and compare the change over time for the mCEQ and CLS across the two treatment groups (RNC and UNC). We found that the change over time for the mCEQ and CLS was significant between the RNC and the UNC treatment groups at the beginning of visit 6 with 1.4 mg nicotine/cigarette. At visits 8 and 9, the RNC group reported significantly lower satisfaction scores compared to UNC. Subscale analysis showed that smoking satisfaction decreased in RNC while other measures, such as cigarette enjoyment, did not change. Understanding the impact of nicotine reduction on cigarette subjective responses through evaluation and liking scales would provide valuable information to the FDA on nicotine reduction policies for cigarettes. MDPI 2020-09-26 2020-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7579069/ /pubmed/32993116 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17197047 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Lin, Wenxue Krebs, Nicolle M. Zhu, Junjia Foulds, Jonathan Horn, Kimberly Muscat, Joshua E. Comparison between Gradual Reduced Nicotine Content and Usual Nicotine Content Groups on Subjective Cigarette Ratings in a Randomized Double-Blind Trial |
title | Comparison between Gradual Reduced Nicotine Content and Usual Nicotine Content Groups on Subjective Cigarette Ratings in a Randomized Double-Blind Trial |
title_full | Comparison between Gradual Reduced Nicotine Content and Usual Nicotine Content Groups on Subjective Cigarette Ratings in a Randomized Double-Blind Trial |
title_fullStr | Comparison between Gradual Reduced Nicotine Content and Usual Nicotine Content Groups on Subjective Cigarette Ratings in a Randomized Double-Blind Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison between Gradual Reduced Nicotine Content and Usual Nicotine Content Groups on Subjective Cigarette Ratings in a Randomized Double-Blind Trial |
title_short | Comparison between Gradual Reduced Nicotine Content and Usual Nicotine Content Groups on Subjective Cigarette Ratings in a Randomized Double-Blind Trial |
title_sort | comparison between gradual reduced nicotine content and usual nicotine content groups on subjective cigarette ratings in a randomized double-blind trial |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7579069/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32993116 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17197047 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT linwenxue comparisonbetweengradualreducednicotinecontentandusualnicotinecontentgroupsonsubjectivecigaretteratingsinarandomizeddoubleblindtrial AT krebsnicollem comparisonbetweengradualreducednicotinecontentandusualnicotinecontentgroupsonsubjectivecigaretteratingsinarandomizeddoubleblindtrial AT zhujunjia comparisonbetweengradualreducednicotinecontentandusualnicotinecontentgroupsonsubjectivecigaretteratingsinarandomizeddoubleblindtrial AT fouldsjonathan comparisonbetweengradualreducednicotinecontentandusualnicotinecontentgroupsonsubjectivecigaretteratingsinarandomizeddoubleblindtrial AT hornkimberly comparisonbetweengradualreducednicotinecontentandusualnicotinecontentgroupsonsubjectivecigaretteratingsinarandomizeddoubleblindtrial AT muscatjoshuae comparisonbetweengradualreducednicotinecontentandusualnicotinecontentgroupsonsubjectivecigaretteratingsinarandomizeddoubleblindtrial |