Cargando…
Head-Out Water-Based Protocols to Assess Cardiorespiratory Fitness—Systematic Review
The aquatic environment offers cardiorespiratory training and testing options particularly for individuals unable to adequately train or test on land because of weight bearing, pain or disability concerns. No systematic review exists describing cardiorespiratory fitness protocols used in an aquatic...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7579306/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33023128 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17197215 |
_version_ | 1783598559531106304 |
---|---|
author | Ogonowska-Slodownik, Anna Richley Geigle, Paula Morgulec-Adamowicz, Natalia |
author_facet | Ogonowska-Slodownik, Anna Richley Geigle, Paula Morgulec-Adamowicz, Natalia |
author_sort | Ogonowska-Slodownik, Anna |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aquatic environment offers cardiorespiratory training and testing options particularly for individuals unable to adequately train or test on land because of weight bearing, pain or disability concerns. No systematic review exists describing cardiorespiratory fitness protocols used in an aquatic environment. This review investigated the different head-out water-based protocols used to assess cardiorespiratory fitness. Our comprehensive, systematic review included 41 studies with each included paper methodological quality assessed using the statistical review of general papers checklist. Diverse protocols arose with three major categories identified: conducted in shallow water, deep water, and using special equipment. Thirty-seven articles presented data for peak/maximal oxygen consumption (VO(2peak)/VO(2max)). Twenty-eight of 37 studies predefined criteria for reaching a valid VO(2peak)/VO(2max) with shallow water exercise demonstrating 20.6 to 57.2 mL/kg/min; deep water running 20.32 to 48.4 mL/kg/min; and underwater treadmill and cycling 28.64 to 62.2 mL/kg/min. No single, accepted head-out water-based protocol for evaluating cardiorespiratory fitness arose. For clinical use three cardiorespiratory fitness testing concepts ensued: water temperature of 28–30 °C with difference of maximum 1 °C between testing participants and/or testing sessions; water depth adapted for participant aquatic experiences and abilities; and intensity increment of 10–15 metronome beats per minute. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7579306 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75793062020-10-29 Head-Out Water-Based Protocols to Assess Cardiorespiratory Fitness—Systematic Review Ogonowska-Slodownik, Anna Richley Geigle, Paula Morgulec-Adamowicz, Natalia Int J Environ Res Public Health Review The aquatic environment offers cardiorespiratory training and testing options particularly for individuals unable to adequately train or test on land because of weight bearing, pain or disability concerns. No systematic review exists describing cardiorespiratory fitness protocols used in an aquatic environment. This review investigated the different head-out water-based protocols used to assess cardiorespiratory fitness. Our comprehensive, systematic review included 41 studies with each included paper methodological quality assessed using the statistical review of general papers checklist. Diverse protocols arose with three major categories identified: conducted in shallow water, deep water, and using special equipment. Thirty-seven articles presented data for peak/maximal oxygen consumption (VO(2peak)/VO(2max)). Twenty-eight of 37 studies predefined criteria for reaching a valid VO(2peak)/VO(2max) with shallow water exercise demonstrating 20.6 to 57.2 mL/kg/min; deep water running 20.32 to 48.4 mL/kg/min; and underwater treadmill and cycling 28.64 to 62.2 mL/kg/min. No single, accepted head-out water-based protocol for evaluating cardiorespiratory fitness arose. For clinical use three cardiorespiratory fitness testing concepts ensued: water temperature of 28–30 °C with difference of maximum 1 °C between testing participants and/or testing sessions; water depth adapted for participant aquatic experiences and abilities; and intensity increment of 10–15 metronome beats per minute. MDPI 2020-10-02 2020-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7579306/ /pubmed/33023128 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17197215 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Ogonowska-Slodownik, Anna Richley Geigle, Paula Morgulec-Adamowicz, Natalia Head-Out Water-Based Protocols to Assess Cardiorespiratory Fitness—Systematic Review |
title | Head-Out Water-Based Protocols to Assess Cardiorespiratory Fitness—Systematic Review |
title_full | Head-Out Water-Based Protocols to Assess Cardiorespiratory Fitness—Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Head-Out Water-Based Protocols to Assess Cardiorespiratory Fitness—Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Head-Out Water-Based Protocols to Assess Cardiorespiratory Fitness—Systematic Review |
title_short | Head-Out Water-Based Protocols to Assess Cardiorespiratory Fitness—Systematic Review |
title_sort | head-out water-based protocols to assess cardiorespiratory fitness—systematic review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7579306/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33023128 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17197215 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ogonowskaslodownikanna headoutwaterbasedprotocolstoassesscardiorespiratoryfitnesssystematicreview AT richleygeiglepaula headoutwaterbasedprotocolstoassesscardiorespiratoryfitnesssystematicreview AT morgulecadamowicznatalia headoutwaterbasedprotocolstoassesscardiorespiratoryfitnesssystematicreview |