Cargando…

Head-Out Water-Based Protocols to Assess Cardiorespiratory Fitness—Systematic Review

The aquatic environment offers cardiorespiratory training and testing options particularly for individuals unable to adequately train or test on land because of weight bearing, pain or disability concerns. No systematic review exists describing cardiorespiratory fitness protocols used in an aquatic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ogonowska-Slodownik, Anna, Richley Geigle, Paula, Morgulec-Adamowicz, Natalia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7579306/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33023128
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17197215
_version_ 1783598559531106304
author Ogonowska-Slodownik, Anna
Richley Geigle, Paula
Morgulec-Adamowicz, Natalia
author_facet Ogonowska-Slodownik, Anna
Richley Geigle, Paula
Morgulec-Adamowicz, Natalia
author_sort Ogonowska-Slodownik, Anna
collection PubMed
description The aquatic environment offers cardiorespiratory training and testing options particularly for individuals unable to adequately train or test on land because of weight bearing, pain or disability concerns. No systematic review exists describing cardiorespiratory fitness protocols used in an aquatic environment. This review investigated the different head-out water-based protocols used to assess cardiorespiratory fitness. Our comprehensive, systematic review included 41 studies with each included paper methodological quality assessed using the statistical review of general papers checklist. Diverse protocols arose with three major categories identified: conducted in shallow water, deep water, and using special equipment. Thirty-seven articles presented data for peak/maximal oxygen consumption (VO(2peak)/VO(2max)). Twenty-eight of 37 studies predefined criteria for reaching a valid VO(2peak)/VO(2max) with shallow water exercise demonstrating 20.6 to 57.2 mL/kg/min; deep water running 20.32 to 48.4 mL/kg/min; and underwater treadmill and cycling 28.64 to 62.2 mL/kg/min. No single, accepted head-out water-based protocol for evaluating cardiorespiratory fitness arose. For clinical use three cardiorespiratory fitness testing concepts ensued: water temperature of 28–30 °C with difference of maximum 1 °C between testing participants and/or testing sessions; water depth adapted for participant aquatic experiences and abilities; and intensity increment of 10–15 metronome beats per minute.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7579306
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75793062020-10-29 Head-Out Water-Based Protocols to Assess Cardiorespiratory Fitness—Systematic Review Ogonowska-Slodownik, Anna Richley Geigle, Paula Morgulec-Adamowicz, Natalia Int J Environ Res Public Health Review The aquatic environment offers cardiorespiratory training and testing options particularly for individuals unable to adequately train or test on land because of weight bearing, pain or disability concerns. No systematic review exists describing cardiorespiratory fitness protocols used in an aquatic environment. This review investigated the different head-out water-based protocols used to assess cardiorespiratory fitness. Our comprehensive, systematic review included 41 studies with each included paper methodological quality assessed using the statistical review of general papers checklist. Diverse protocols arose with three major categories identified: conducted in shallow water, deep water, and using special equipment. Thirty-seven articles presented data for peak/maximal oxygen consumption (VO(2peak)/VO(2max)). Twenty-eight of 37 studies predefined criteria for reaching a valid VO(2peak)/VO(2max) with shallow water exercise demonstrating 20.6 to 57.2 mL/kg/min; deep water running 20.32 to 48.4 mL/kg/min; and underwater treadmill and cycling 28.64 to 62.2 mL/kg/min. No single, accepted head-out water-based protocol for evaluating cardiorespiratory fitness arose. For clinical use three cardiorespiratory fitness testing concepts ensued: water temperature of 28–30 °C with difference of maximum 1 °C between testing participants and/or testing sessions; water depth adapted for participant aquatic experiences and abilities; and intensity increment of 10–15 metronome beats per minute. MDPI 2020-10-02 2020-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7579306/ /pubmed/33023128 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17197215 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Ogonowska-Slodownik, Anna
Richley Geigle, Paula
Morgulec-Adamowicz, Natalia
Head-Out Water-Based Protocols to Assess Cardiorespiratory Fitness—Systematic Review
title Head-Out Water-Based Protocols to Assess Cardiorespiratory Fitness—Systematic Review
title_full Head-Out Water-Based Protocols to Assess Cardiorespiratory Fitness—Systematic Review
title_fullStr Head-Out Water-Based Protocols to Assess Cardiorespiratory Fitness—Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Head-Out Water-Based Protocols to Assess Cardiorespiratory Fitness—Systematic Review
title_short Head-Out Water-Based Protocols to Assess Cardiorespiratory Fitness—Systematic Review
title_sort head-out water-based protocols to assess cardiorespiratory fitness—systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7579306/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33023128
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17197215
work_keys_str_mv AT ogonowskaslodownikanna headoutwaterbasedprotocolstoassesscardiorespiratoryfitnesssystematicreview
AT richleygeiglepaula headoutwaterbasedprotocolstoassesscardiorespiratoryfitnesssystematicreview
AT morgulecadamowicznatalia headoutwaterbasedprotocolstoassesscardiorespiratoryfitnesssystematicreview