Cargando…

Why do they do it? A grounded theory study of the use of low-value care among primary health care physicians

BACKGROUND: The use of low-value care (LVC) is widespread and has an impact on both the use of resources and the quality of care. However, few studies have thus far studied the factors influencing the use of LVC from the perspective of the practitioners themselves. The aim of this study is to unders...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ingvarsson, Sara, Augustsson, Hanna, Hasson, Henna, Nilsen, Per, von Thiele Schwarz, Ulrica, von Knorring, Mia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7579796/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33087154
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-020-01052-5
_version_ 1783598668074450944
author Ingvarsson, Sara
Augustsson, Hanna
Hasson, Henna
Nilsen, Per
von Thiele Schwarz, Ulrica
von Knorring, Mia
author_facet Ingvarsson, Sara
Augustsson, Hanna
Hasson, Henna
Nilsen, Per
von Thiele Schwarz, Ulrica
von Knorring, Mia
author_sort Ingvarsson, Sara
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The use of low-value care (LVC) is widespread and has an impact on both the use of resources and the quality of care. However, few studies have thus far studied the factors influencing the use of LVC from the perspective of the practitioners themselves. The aim of this study is to understand why physicians within primary care use LVC. METHODS: Six primary health care centers in the Stockholm Region were purposively selected. Focus group discussions were conducted with physicians (n = 31) working in the centers. The discussions were coded inductively using a grounded theory approach. RESULTS: Three main reasons for performing LVC were identified. Uncertainty and disagreement about what not to do was related to being unaware of the LVC status of a practice, guidelines perceived as conflicting, guidelines perceived to be irrelevant for the target patient population, or a lack of trust in the guidelines. Perceived pressure from others concerned patient pressure, pressure from other physicians, or pressure from the health care system. A desire to do something for the patients was associated with the fact that the visit in itself prompts action, symptoms to relieve, or that patients' emotions need to be reassured. The three reasons are interdependent. Uncertainty and disagreement about what not to do have made it more difficult to handle the pressure from others and to refrain from doing something for the patients. The pressure from others and the desire to do something for the patients enhanced the uncertainty and disagreement about what not to do. Furthermore, the pressure from others influenced the desire to do something for the patients. CONCLUSIONS: Three reasons work together to explain primary care physicians’ use of LVC: uncertainty and disagreement about what not to do, perceived pressure from others, and the desire to do something for the patients. The reasons may, in turn, be influenced by the health care system, but the decision nevertheless seemed to be up to the individual physician. The findings suggest that the de-implementation of LVC needs to address the three reasons from a systems perspective.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7579796
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75797962020-10-22 Why do they do it? A grounded theory study of the use of low-value care among primary health care physicians Ingvarsson, Sara Augustsson, Hanna Hasson, Henna Nilsen, Per von Thiele Schwarz, Ulrica von Knorring, Mia Implement Sci Research BACKGROUND: The use of low-value care (LVC) is widespread and has an impact on both the use of resources and the quality of care. However, few studies have thus far studied the factors influencing the use of LVC from the perspective of the practitioners themselves. The aim of this study is to understand why physicians within primary care use LVC. METHODS: Six primary health care centers in the Stockholm Region were purposively selected. Focus group discussions were conducted with physicians (n = 31) working in the centers. The discussions were coded inductively using a grounded theory approach. RESULTS: Three main reasons for performing LVC were identified. Uncertainty and disagreement about what not to do was related to being unaware of the LVC status of a practice, guidelines perceived as conflicting, guidelines perceived to be irrelevant for the target patient population, or a lack of trust in the guidelines. Perceived pressure from others concerned patient pressure, pressure from other physicians, or pressure from the health care system. A desire to do something for the patients was associated with the fact that the visit in itself prompts action, symptoms to relieve, or that patients' emotions need to be reassured. The three reasons are interdependent. Uncertainty and disagreement about what not to do have made it more difficult to handle the pressure from others and to refrain from doing something for the patients. The pressure from others and the desire to do something for the patients enhanced the uncertainty and disagreement about what not to do. Furthermore, the pressure from others influenced the desire to do something for the patients. CONCLUSIONS: Three reasons work together to explain primary care physicians’ use of LVC: uncertainty and disagreement about what not to do, perceived pressure from others, and the desire to do something for the patients. The reasons may, in turn, be influenced by the health care system, but the decision nevertheless seemed to be up to the individual physician. The findings suggest that the de-implementation of LVC needs to address the three reasons from a systems perspective. BioMed Central 2020-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7579796/ /pubmed/33087154 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-020-01052-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Ingvarsson, Sara
Augustsson, Hanna
Hasson, Henna
Nilsen, Per
von Thiele Schwarz, Ulrica
von Knorring, Mia
Why do they do it? A grounded theory study of the use of low-value care among primary health care physicians
title Why do they do it? A grounded theory study of the use of low-value care among primary health care physicians
title_full Why do they do it? A grounded theory study of the use of low-value care among primary health care physicians
title_fullStr Why do they do it? A grounded theory study of the use of low-value care among primary health care physicians
title_full_unstemmed Why do they do it? A grounded theory study of the use of low-value care among primary health care physicians
title_short Why do they do it? A grounded theory study of the use of low-value care among primary health care physicians
title_sort why do they do it? a grounded theory study of the use of low-value care among primary health care physicians
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7579796/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33087154
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-020-01052-5
work_keys_str_mv AT ingvarssonsara whydotheydoitagroundedtheorystudyoftheuseoflowvaluecareamongprimaryhealthcarephysicians
AT augustssonhanna whydotheydoitagroundedtheorystudyoftheuseoflowvaluecareamongprimaryhealthcarephysicians
AT hassonhenna whydotheydoitagroundedtheorystudyoftheuseoflowvaluecareamongprimaryhealthcarephysicians
AT nilsenper whydotheydoitagroundedtheorystudyoftheuseoflowvaluecareamongprimaryhealthcarephysicians
AT vonthieleschwarzulrica whydotheydoitagroundedtheorystudyoftheuseoflowvaluecareamongprimaryhealthcarephysicians
AT vonknorringmia whydotheydoitagroundedtheorystudyoftheuseoflowvaluecareamongprimaryhealthcarephysicians