Cargando…

Gravitational distribution of regional opening and closing pressures, hysteresis and atelectrauma in ARDS evaluated by electrical impedance tomography

BACKGROUND: The physiological behavior of lungs affected by the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) differs between inspiration and expiration and presents heterogeneous gravity-dependent distribution. This phenomenon, highlighted by the different distribution of opening/closing pressure and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Scaramuzzo, Gaetano, Spinelli, Elena, Spadaro, Savino, Santini, Alessandro, Tortolani, Donatella, Dalla Corte, Francesca, Pesenti, Antonio, Volta, Carlo Alberto, Grasselli, Giacomo, Mauri, Tommaso
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7579854/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33092607
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-020-03335-1
_version_ 1783598677573500928
author Scaramuzzo, Gaetano
Spinelli, Elena
Spadaro, Savino
Santini, Alessandro
Tortolani, Donatella
Dalla Corte, Francesca
Pesenti, Antonio
Volta, Carlo Alberto
Grasselli, Giacomo
Mauri, Tommaso
author_facet Scaramuzzo, Gaetano
Spinelli, Elena
Spadaro, Savino
Santini, Alessandro
Tortolani, Donatella
Dalla Corte, Francesca
Pesenti, Antonio
Volta, Carlo Alberto
Grasselli, Giacomo
Mauri, Tommaso
author_sort Scaramuzzo, Gaetano
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The physiological behavior of lungs affected by the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) differs between inspiration and expiration and presents heterogeneous gravity-dependent distribution. This phenomenon, highlighted by the different distribution of opening/closing pressure and by the hysteresis of the pressure–volume curve, can be studied by CT scan, but the technique expose the patient to radiations, cannot track changes during time and is not feasible at the bedside. Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) could help in assessing at the bedside regional inspiratory and expiratory mechanical properties. We evaluated regional opening/closing pressures, hysteresis and atelectrauma during inspiratory and expiratory low-flow pressure–volume curves in ARDS using electrical impedance tomography. METHODS: Pixel-level inspiratory and expiratory PV curves (PV(pixel)) between 5 and 40 cmH(2)O were constructed integrating EIT images and airway opening pressure signal from 8 ARDS patients. The lower inflection point in the inspiratory and expiratory PV(pixel) were used to find opening (OP(pixel)) and closing (CP(pixel)) pressures. A novel atelectrauma index (AtI) was calculated as the percentage of pixels opening during the inspiratory and closing during the expiratory PV curves. The maximal hysteresis (HysMax) was calculated as the maximal difference between normalized expiratory and inspiratory PV curves. Analyses were conducted in the global, dependent and non-dependent lung regions. RESULTS: Gaussian distribution was confirmed for both global OP(pixel) (r(2) = 0.90) and global CP(pixel) (r(2) = 0.94). The two distributions were significantly different with higher values for OP(pixel) (p < 0.0001). Regional OP(pixel) and CP(pixel) distributions were Gaussian, and in the dependent lung regions, both were significantly higher than in the non-dependent ones (p < 0.001). Both AtI and the HysMax were significantly higher in the dependent regions compared to the non-dependent ones (p < 0.05 for both). CONCLUSIONS: Gravity impacts the regional distribution of opening and closing pressure, hysteresis and atelectrauma, with higher values in the dorsal lung. Regional differences between inspiratory and expiratory lung physiology are detectable at the bedside using EIT and could allow in-depth characterization of ARDS phenotypes and guide personalized ventilation settings. GRAPHIC ABSTRACT: [Image: see text]
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7579854
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75798542020-10-23 Gravitational distribution of regional opening and closing pressures, hysteresis and atelectrauma in ARDS evaluated by electrical impedance tomography Scaramuzzo, Gaetano Spinelli, Elena Spadaro, Savino Santini, Alessandro Tortolani, Donatella Dalla Corte, Francesca Pesenti, Antonio Volta, Carlo Alberto Grasselli, Giacomo Mauri, Tommaso Crit Care Research BACKGROUND: The physiological behavior of lungs affected by the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) differs between inspiration and expiration and presents heterogeneous gravity-dependent distribution. This phenomenon, highlighted by the different distribution of opening/closing pressure and by the hysteresis of the pressure–volume curve, can be studied by CT scan, but the technique expose the patient to radiations, cannot track changes during time and is not feasible at the bedside. Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) could help in assessing at the bedside regional inspiratory and expiratory mechanical properties. We evaluated regional opening/closing pressures, hysteresis and atelectrauma during inspiratory and expiratory low-flow pressure–volume curves in ARDS using electrical impedance tomography. METHODS: Pixel-level inspiratory and expiratory PV curves (PV(pixel)) between 5 and 40 cmH(2)O were constructed integrating EIT images and airway opening pressure signal from 8 ARDS patients. The lower inflection point in the inspiratory and expiratory PV(pixel) were used to find opening (OP(pixel)) and closing (CP(pixel)) pressures. A novel atelectrauma index (AtI) was calculated as the percentage of pixels opening during the inspiratory and closing during the expiratory PV curves. The maximal hysteresis (HysMax) was calculated as the maximal difference between normalized expiratory and inspiratory PV curves. Analyses were conducted in the global, dependent and non-dependent lung regions. RESULTS: Gaussian distribution was confirmed for both global OP(pixel) (r(2) = 0.90) and global CP(pixel) (r(2) = 0.94). The two distributions were significantly different with higher values for OP(pixel) (p < 0.0001). Regional OP(pixel) and CP(pixel) distributions were Gaussian, and in the dependent lung regions, both were significantly higher than in the non-dependent ones (p < 0.001). Both AtI and the HysMax were significantly higher in the dependent regions compared to the non-dependent ones (p < 0.05 for both). CONCLUSIONS: Gravity impacts the regional distribution of opening and closing pressure, hysteresis and atelectrauma, with higher values in the dorsal lung. Regional differences between inspiratory and expiratory lung physiology are detectable at the bedside using EIT and could allow in-depth characterization of ARDS phenotypes and guide personalized ventilation settings. GRAPHIC ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] BioMed Central 2020-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7579854/ /pubmed/33092607 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-020-03335-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Scaramuzzo, Gaetano
Spinelli, Elena
Spadaro, Savino
Santini, Alessandro
Tortolani, Donatella
Dalla Corte, Francesca
Pesenti, Antonio
Volta, Carlo Alberto
Grasselli, Giacomo
Mauri, Tommaso
Gravitational distribution of regional opening and closing pressures, hysteresis and atelectrauma in ARDS evaluated by electrical impedance tomography
title Gravitational distribution of regional opening and closing pressures, hysteresis and atelectrauma in ARDS evaluated by electrical impedance tomography
title_full Gravitational distribution of regional opening and closing pressures, hysteresis and atelectrauma in ARDS evaluated by electrical impedance tomography
title_fullStr Gravitational distribution of regional opening and closing pressures, hysteresis and atelectrauma in ARDS evaluated by electrical impedance tomography
title_full_unstemmed Gravitational distribution of regional opening and closing pressures, hysteresis and atelectrauma in ARDS evaluated by electrical impedance tomography
title_short Gravitational distribution of regional opening and closing pressures, hysteresis and atelectrauma in ARDS evaluated by electrical impedance tomography
title_sort gravitational distribution of regional opening and closing pressures, hysteresis and atelectrauma in ards evaluated by electrical impedance tomography
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7579854/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33092607
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-020-03335-1
work_keys_str_mv AT scaramuzzogaetano gravitationaldistributionofregionalopeningandclosingpressureshysteresisandatelectraumainardsevaluatedbyelectricalimpedancetomography
AT spinellielena gravitationaldistributionofregionalopeningandclosingpressureshysteresisandatelectraumainardsevaluatedbyelectricalimpedancetomography
AT spadarosavino gravitationaldistributionofregionalopeningandclosingpressureshysteresisandatelectraumainardsevaluatedbyelectricalimpedancetomography
AT santinialessandro gravitationaldistributionofregionalopeningandclosingpressureshysteresisandatelectraumainardsevaluatedbyelectricalimpedancetomography
AT tortolanidonatella gravitationaldistributionofregionalopeningandclosingpressureshysteresisandatelectraumainardsevaluatedbyelectricalimpedancetomography
AT dallacortefrancesca gravitationaldistributionofregionalopeningandclosingpressureshysteresisandatelectraumainardsevaluatedbyelectricalimpedancetomography
AT pesentiantonio gravitationaldistributionofregionalopeningandclosingpressureshysteresisandatelectraumainardsevaluatedbyelectricalimpedancetomography
AT voltacarloalberto gravitationaldistributionofregionalopeningandclosingpressureshysteresisandatelectraumainardsevaluatedbyelectricalimpedancetomography
AT grasselligiacomo gravitationaldistributionofregionalopeningandclosingpressureshysteresisandatelectraumainardsevaluatedbyelectricalimpedancetomography
AT mauritommaso gravitationaldistributionofregionalopeningandclosingpressureshysteresisandatelectraumainardsevaluatedbyelectricalimpedancetomography