Cargando…

Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ) in mainland China: an investigation of reliability, validity, and responsiveness

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to investigate the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of JOACMEQ for CSM patients in mainland China. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on 91 patients with CSM in our hospital from March 2015 to June 2015. Patients completed the JOACMEQ, the mJO...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhou, Feifei, Li, Shuyang, Zhang, Yilong, Zhao, Yanbin, Ju, Kevin L., Zhang, Fengshan, Pan, Shengfa, Sun, Yu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7579864/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33092600
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-020-01602-x
_version_ 1783598679210328064
author Zhou, Feifei
Li, Shuyang
Zhang, Yilong
Zhao, Yanbin
Ju, Kevin L.
Zhang, Fengshan
Pan, Shengfa
Sun, Yu
author_facet Zhou, Feifei
Li, Shuyang
Zhang, Yilong
Zhao, Yanbin
Ju, Kevin L.
Zhang, Fengshan
Pan, Shengfa
Sun, Yu
author_sort Zhou, Feifei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to investigate the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of JOACMEQ for CSM patients in mainland China. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on 91 patients with CSM in our hospital from March 2015 to June 2015. Patients completed the JOACMEQ, the mJOA and the SF-36 questionnaires during the process. Cronbach's α was used to evaluate the internal consistency reliability, and test–retest reliability was checked. An exploratory factor analysis was used to determine the correlations among the JOACMEQ questions and the construct validity. The concurrent validity was assessed by Spearman correlation coefficient. The internal responsiveness was determined by effect sizes and standardized response means. External responsiveness was determined by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve on the basis of the Youden Index. RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 57.61 years old. The mean follow-up was 24 months. JOACMEQ showed a good internal consistency (Cronbach's α, 0.897). Test–retest reliability showing good result (Pearson's correlation, 0.695–0.905). Our data were amenable to factor analysis (KMO = 0.816, Bartlett's test, χ(2)(45) = 1199.99, p < 0.001), and five factors above 1 were strongly loaded and clustered for each of the five factors. Comparing the scales preoperative to those 2 years postoperative, the average scores of the subscales all increased, and both the ES and SRM showing satisfied responsiveness. In external responsiveness analysis, the recovery rate a appeared to be most responsive to post-operative improvement. CONCLUSIONS: The Simplified Chinese version of JOACMEQ was well-developed with great reliability and sensitive responsiveness. Our study demonstrated that JOACMEQ has content psychometric properties to identify postoperative improvements in CSM patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7579864
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75798642020-10-22 Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ) in mainland China: an investigation of reliability, validity, and responsiveness Zhou, Feifei Li, Shuyang Zhang, Yilong Zhao, Yanbin Ju, Kevin L. Zhang, Fengshan Pan, Shengfa Sun, Yu Health Qual Life Outcomes Research BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to investigate the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of JOACMEQ for CSM patients in mainland China. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on 91 patients with CSM in our hospital from March 2015 to June 2015. Patients completed the JOACMEQ, the mJOA and the SF-36 questionnaires during the process. Cronbach's α was used to evaluate the internal consistency reliability, and test–retest reliability was checked. An exploratory factor analysis was used to determine the correlations among the JOACMEQ questions and the construct validity. The concurrent validity was assessed by Spearman correlation coefficient. The internal responsiveness was determined by effect sizes and standardized response means. External responsiveness was determined by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve on the basis of the Youden Index. RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 57.61 years old. The mean follow-up was 24 months. JOACMEQ showed a good internal consistency (Cronbach's α, 0.897). Test–retest reliability showing good result (Pearson's correlation, 0.695–0.905). Our data were amenable to factor analysis (KMO = 0.816, Bartlett's test, χ(2)(45) = 1199.99, p < 0.001), and five factors above 1 were strongly loaded and clustered for each of the five factors. Comparing the scales preoperative to those 2 years postoperative, the average scores of the subscales all increased, and both the ES and SRM showing satisfied responsiveness. In external responsiveness analysis, the recovery rate a appeared to be most responsive to post-operative improvement. CONCLUSIONS: The Simplified Chinese version of JOACMEQ was well-developed with great reliability and sensitive responsiveness. Our study demonstrated that JOACMEQ has content psychometric properties to identify postoperative improvements in CSM patients. BioMed Central 2020-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7579864/ /pubmed/33092600 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-020-01602-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Zhou, Feifei
Li, Shuyang
Zhang, Yilong
Zhao, Yanbin
Ju, Kevin L.
Zhang, Fengshan
Pan, Shengfa
Sun, Yu
Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ) in mainland China: an investigation of reliability, validity, and responsiveness
title Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ) in mainland China: an investigation of reliability, validity, and responsiveness
title_full Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ) in mainland China: an investigation of reliability, validity, and responsiveness
title_fullStr Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ) in mainland China: an investigation of reliability, validity, and responsiveness
title_full_unstemmed Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ) in mainland China: an investigation of reliability, validity, and responsiveness
title_short Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ) in mainland China: an investigation of reliability, validity, and responsiveness
title_sort japanese orthopaedic association cervical myelopathy evaluation questionnaire (joacmeq) in mainland china: an investigation of reliability, validity, and responsiveness
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7579864/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33092600
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-020-01602-x
work_keys_str_mv AT zhoufeifei japaneseorthopaedicassociationcervicalmyelopathyevaluationquestionnairejoacmeqinmainlandchinaaninvestigationofreliabilityvalidityandresponsiveness
AT lishuyang japaneseorthopaedicassociationcervicalmyelopathyevaluationquestionnairejoacmeqinmainlandchinaaninvestigationofreliabilityvalidityandresponsiveness
AT zhangyilong japaneseorthopaedicassociationcervicalmyelopathyevaluationquestionnairejoacmeqinmainlandchinaaninvestigationofreliabilityvalidityandresponsiveness
AT zhaoyanbin japaneseorthopaedicassociationcervicalmyelopathyevaluationquestionnairejoacmeqinmainlandchinaaninvestigationofreliabilityvalidityandresponsiveness
AT jukevinl japaneseorthopaedicassociationcervicalmyelopathyevaluationquestionnairejoacmeqinmainlandchinaaninvestigationofreliabilityvalidityandresponsiveness
AT zhangfengshan japaneseorthopaedicassociationcervicalmyelopathyevaluationquestionnairejoacmeqinmainlandchinaaninvestigationofreliabilityvalidityandresponsiveness
AT panshengfa japaneseorthopaedicassociationcervicalmyelopathyevaluationquestionnairejoacmeqinmainlandchinaaninvestigationofreliabilityvalidityandresponsiveness
AT sunyu japaneseorthopaedicassociationcervicalmyelopathyevaluationquestionnairejoacmeqinmainlandchinaaninvestigationofreliabilityvalidityandresponsiveness