Cargando…

Letter on Predicting the number of sites needed to deliver a multicentre clinical trial within a limited time frame in the UK

ABSTRACT: When planning a multicentre clinical trial, it can be difficult to predict the time needed to open individual sites, and this in turn impacts on the total number of sites needed, the budget and the time frame for a clinical trial to be delivered successfully. This is of particular importan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Greenwood, Rosemary, Pell, Julie, Foscarini-Craggs, Paula, Wale, Katharine, Thomas, Ian, Bradbury, Charlotte
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7579882/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33087161
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-04798-x
_version_ 1783598682946404352
author Greenwood, Rosemary
Pell, Julie
Foscarini-Craggs, Paula
Wale, Katharine
Thomas, Ian
Bradbury, Charlotte
author_facet Greenwood, Rosemary
Pell, Julie
Foscarini-Craggs, Paula
Wale, Katharine
Thomas, Ian
Bradbury, Charlotte
author_sort Greenwood, Rosemary
collection PubMed
description ABSTRACT: When planning a multicentre clinical trial, it can be difficult to predict the time needed to open individual sites, and this in turn impacts on the total number of sites needed, the budget and the time frame for a clinical trial to be delivered successfully. This is of particular importance for funding applications with a limited time frame and budget such as NIHR RfPB. It is more efficient and cost-effective to open the total number of sites needed at the outset of a trial, rather than to respond later to slow site opening and recruitment. Here, we share our experience of successfully delivering a multicentre clinical trial for a rare disease within a limited time frame and budget by approximately doubling the number of sites initially predicted to be needed. We initially predicted 20 sites would be needed to deliver the clinical trial, but early on in the trial, the number of sites was more than doubled to allow successful recruitment of the target sample size within the desired time frame. Of the 48 ethically approved sites, the median time from ethical approval of a site to opening for recruitment was 182 days (95% confidence interval [143 to 245 days]) and ranged from 18 to 613 days. In four (9%) of these sites, part of the delay was due to pharmacy sign off not being given when R&D had issued capacity and capability (C&C). Delays due to pharmacy sign off varied from 10 days to over 3 months delay in two sites (94 days and 102 days). A mathematical solution to the problem of planning a study with a short recruitment window has been given to support the planning and costing of grants with fixed time constraints: number of sites = required sample size divided by (number of eligible patients per site per month times recruitment rate times (the number of months accrual minus 6 months)). We expect these results to help others who are planning multicentre clinical trials in the UK. Ethical approval from NRES Committee South West (IRAS number 225959). TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT Number 2017-001171-23. Registered on 26 June 2017
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7579882
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75798822020-10-22 Letter on Predicting the number of sites needed to deliver a multicentre clinical trial within a limited time frame in the UK Greenwood, Rosemary Pell, Julie Foscarini-Craggs, Paula Wale, Katharine Thomas, Ian Bradbury, Charlotte Trials Letter ABSTRACT: When planning a multicentre clinical trial, it can be difficult to predict the time needed to open individual sites, and this in turn impacts on the total number of sites needed, the budget and the time frame for a clinical trial to be delivered successfully. This is of particular importance for funding applications with a limited time frame and budget such as NIHR RfPB. It is more efficient and cost-effective to open the total number of sites needed at the outset of a trial, rather than to respond later to slow site opening and recruitment. Here, we share our experience of successfully delivering a multicentre clinical trial for a rare disease within a limited time frame and budget by approximately doubling the number of sites initially predicted to be needed. We initially predicted 20 sites would be needed to deliver the clinical trial, but early on in the trial, the number of sites was more than doubled to allow successful recruitment of the target sample size within the desired time frame. Of the 48 ethically approved sites, the median time from ethical approval of a site to opening for recruitment was 182 days (95% confidence interval [143 to 245 days]) and ranged from 18 to 613 days. In four (9%) of these sites, part of the delay was due to pharmacy sign off not being given when R&D had issued capacity and capability (C&C). Delays due to pharmacy sign off varied from 10 days to over 3 months delay in two sites (94 days and 102 days). A mathematical solution to the problem of planning a study with a short recruitment window has been given to support the planning and costing of grants with fixed time constraints: number of sites = required sample size divided by (number of eligible patients per site per month times recruitment rate times (the number of months accrual minus 6 months)). We expect these results to help others who are planning multicentre clinical trials in the UK. Ethical approval from NRES Committee South West (IRAS number 225959). TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT Number 2017-001171-23. Registered on 26 June 2017 BioMed Central 2020-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7579882/ /pubmed/33087161 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-04798-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Letter
Greenwood, Rosemary
Pell, Julie
Foscarini-Craggs, Paula
Wale, Katharine
Thomas, Ian
Bradbury, Charlotte
Letter on Predicting the number of sites needed to deliver a multicentre clinical trial within a limited time frame in the UK
title Letter on Predicting the number of sites needed to deliver a multicentre clinical trial within a limited time frame in the UK
title_full Letter on Predicting the number of sites needed to deliver a multicentre clinical trial within a limited time frame in the UK
title_fullStr Letter on Predicting the number of sites needed to deliver a multicentre clinical trial within a limited time frame in the UK
title_full_unstemmed Letter on Predicting the number of sites needed to deliver a multicentre clinical trial within a limited time frame in the UK
title_short Letter on Predicting the number of sites needed to deliver a multicentre clinical trial within a limited time frame in the UK
title_sort letter on predicting the number of sites needed to deliver a multicentre clinical trial within a limited time frame in the uk
topic Letter
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7579882/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33087161
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-04798-x
work_keys_str_mv AT greenwoodrosemary letteronpredictingthenumberofsitesneededtodeliveramulticentreclinicaltrialwithinalimitedtimeframeintheuk
AT pelljulie letteronpredictingthenumberofsitesneededtodeliveramulticentreclinicaltrialwithinalimitedtimeframeintheuk
AT foscarinicraggspaula letteronpredictingthenumberofsitesneededtodeliveramulticentreclinicaltrialwithinalimitedtimeframeintheuk
AT walekatharine letteronpredictingthenumberofsitesneededtodeliveramulticentreclinicaltrialwithinalimitedtimeframeintheuk
AT thomasian letteronpredictingthenumberofsitesneededtodeliveramulticentreclinicaltrialwithinalimitedtimeframeintheuk
AT bradburycharlotte letteronpredictingthenumberofsitesneededtodeliveramulticentreclinicaltrialwithinalimitedtimeframeintheuk