Cargando…

An exploratory study to evaluate visual function endpoints in non-advanced age-related macular degeneration

BACKGROUND: To prevent irreversible vision loss in age-related macular degeneration (AMD), it is critical to detect retinal dysfunction before permanent structural loss occurs. In the current study we evaluated a series of visual function tests to identify potential endpoints to detect visual dysfun...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Narayanan, Divya, Rodriguez, John, Wallstrom, Garrick, Welch, Donna, Chapin, Matthew, Arrigg, Paul, Abelson, Mark
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7579935/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33092549
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-020-01683-8
_version_ 1783598695077380096
author Narayanan, Divya
Rodriguez, John
Wallstrom, Garrick
Welch, Donna
Chapin, Matthew
Arrigg, Paul
Abelson, Mark
author_facet Narayanan, Divya
Rodriguez, John
Wallstrom, Garrick
Welch, Donna
Chapin, Matthew
Arrigg, Paul
Abelson, Mark
author_sort Narayanan, Divya
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To prevent irreversible vision loss in age-related macular degeneration (AMD), it is critical to detect retinal dysfunction before permanent structural loss occurs. In the current study we evaluated a series of visual function tests to identify potential endpoints to detect visual dysfunction in non-advanced AMD. METHODS: A series of visual function tests were performed on 23 non-advanced AMD subjects (AREDS grade 1–4 on simplified scale) and 34 age-matched normals (AREDS grade 0). Tests included some commonly used endpoints such as ETDRS visual acuity (VA), low luminance (LL) 2.0ND ETDRS VA, MNREAD as well as newly developed tests such as the Ora-VCF™ test, Ora-tablet reading test, color sensitivity etc. Differences between the two groups were compared for each test. Test-retest repeatability and reproducibility was assessed on a subset of subjects and percent agreement was calculated. RESULTS: There was no difference in standard ETDRS VA between non-advanced AMD (0.06 ± 0.02 logMAR) and normal groups (0.04 ± 0.02 logMAR) (p = 0.57). LL 2.0 ETDRS VA and MNREAD showed no difference between the groups (p > 0.05). Ora-VCF™ test was significantly worse in the non-advanced AMD group compared to normals (0.67 ± 0.07 in AMD; 0.45 ± 0.04 in normals, p = 0.005). Non-advanced AMD subjects also had significantly worse reading performance using the Ora-tablet with LL 2.0ND (114.55 ± 11.22 wpm in AMD; 145.17 ± 9.55 wpm in normals p = 0.049). No significant difference between the groups was noted using other tests. Repeatability was 82% for Ora-VCF™ test and 92% for Ora-tablet LL 2.0ND reading. Reproducibility was 89% for both Ora-VCF™ test and Ora-tablet LL 2.0ND reading. CONCLUSION: While there was no significant difference between non-advanced AMD and normal groups using some current common endpoints such as ETDRS VA, LL 2.0 ETDRS VA or MNREAD, Ora-VCF™ test and Ora-tablet LL 2.0ND reading tests were able to identify significant visual dysfunction in non-advanced AMD subjects. These tests show promise as endpoints for AMD studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7579935
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75799352020-10-22 An exploratory study to evaluate visual function endpoints in non-advanced age-related macular degeneration Narayanan, Divya Rodriguez, John Wallstrom, Garrick Welch, Donna Chapin, Matthew Arrigg, Paul Abelson, Mark BMC Ophthalmol Research Article BACKGROUND: To prevent irreversible vision loss in age-related macular degeneration (AMD), it is critical to detect retinal dysfunction before permanent structural loss occurs. In the current study we evaluated a series of visual function tests to identify potential endpoints to detect visual dysfunction in non-advanced AMD. METHODS: A series of visual function tests were performed on 23 non-advanced AMD subjects (AREDS grade 1–4 on simplified scale) and 34 age-matched normals (AREDS grade 0). Tests included some commonly used endpoints such as ETDRS visual acuity (VA), low luminance (LL) 2.0ND ETDRS VA, MNREAD as well as newly developed tests such as the Ora-VCF™ test, Ora-tablet reading test, color sensitivity etc. Differences between the two groups were compared for each test. Test-retest repeatability and reproducibility was assessed on a subset of subjects and percent agreement was calculated. RESULTS: There was no difference in standard ETDRS VA between non-advanced AMD (0.06 ± 0.02 logMAR) and normal groups (0.04 ± 0.02 logMAR) (p = 0.57). LL 2.0 ETDRS VA and MNREAD showed no difference between the groups (p > 0.05). Ora-VCF™ test was significantly worse in the non-advanced AMD group compared to normals (0.67 ± 0.07 in AMD; 0.45 ± 0.04 in normals, p = 0.005). Non-advanced AMD subjects also had significantly worse reading performance using the Ora-tablet with LL 2.0ND (114.55 ± 11.22 wpm in AMD; 145.17 ± 9.55 wpm in normals p = 0.049). No significant difference between the groups was noted using other tests. Repeatability was 82% for Ora-VCF™ test and 92% for Ora-tablet LL 2.0ND reading. Reproducibility was 89% for both Ora-VCF™ test and Ora-tablet LL 2.0ND reading. CONCLUSION: While there was no significant difference between non-advanced AMD and normal groups using some current common endpoints such as ETDRS VA, LL 2.0 ETDRS VA or MNREAD, Ora-VCF™ test and Ora-tablet LL 2.0ND reading tests were able to identify significant visual dysfunction in non-advanced AMD subjects. These tests show promise as endpoints for AMD studies. BioMed Central 2020-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7579935/ /pubmed/33092549 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-020-01683-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Narayanan, Divya
Rodriguez, John
Wallstrom, Garrick
Welch, Donna
Chapin, Matthew
Arrigg, Paul
Abelson, Mark
An exploratory study to evaluate visual function endpoints in non-advanced age-related macular degeneration
title An exploratory study to evaluate visual function endpoints in non-advanced age-related macular degeneration
title_full An exploratory study to evaluate visual function endpoints in non-advanced age-related macular degeneration
title_fullStr An exploratory study to evaluate visual function endpoints in non-advanced age-related macular degeneration
title_full_unstemmed An exploratory study to evaluate visual function endpoints in non-advanced age-related macular degeneration
title_short An exploratory study to evaluate visual function endpoints in non-advanced age-related macular degeneration
title_sort exploratory study to evaluate visual function endpoints in non-advanced age-related macular degeneration
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7579935/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33092549
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-020-01683-8
work_keys_str_mv AT narayanandivya anexploratorystudytoevaluatevisualfunctionendpointsinnonadvancedagerelatedmaculardegeneration
AT rodriguezjohn anexploratorystudytoevaluatevisualfunctionendpointsinnonadvancedagerelatedmaculardegeneration
AT wallstromgarrick anexploratorystudytoevaluatevisualfunctionendpointsinnonadvancedagerelatedmaculardegeneration
AT welchdonna anexploratorystudytoevaluatevisualfunctionendpointsinnonadvancedagerelatedmaculardegeneration
AT chapinmatthew anexploratorystudytoevaluatevisualfunctionendpointsinnonadvancedagerelatedmaculardegeneration
AT arriggpaul anexploratorystudytoevaluatevisualfunctionendpointsinnonadvancedagerelatedmaculardegeneration
AT abelsonmark anexploratorystudytoevaluatevisualfunctionendpointsinnonadvancedagerelatedmaculardegeneration
AT narayanandivya exploratorystudytoevaluatevisualfunctionendpointsinnonadvancedagerelatedmaculardegeneration
AT rodriguezjohn exploratorystudytoevaluatevisualfunctionendpointsinnonadvancedagerelatedmaculardegeneration
AT wallstromgarrick exploratorystudytoevaluatevisualfunctionendpointsinnonadvancedagerelatedmaculardegeneration
AT welchdonna exploratorystudytoevaluatevisualfunctionendpointsinnonadvancedagerelatedmaculardegeneration
AT chapinmatthew exploratorystudytoevaluatevisualfunctionendpointsinnonadvancedagerelatedmaculardegeneration
AT arriggpaul exploratorystudytoevaluatevisualfunctionendpointsinnonadvancedagerelatedmaculardegeneration
AT abelsonmark exploratorystudytoevaluatevisualfunctionendpointsinnonadvancedagerelatedmaculardegeneration