Cargando…
An exploratory study to evaluate visual function endpoints in non-advanced age-related macular degeneration
BACKGROUND: To prevent irreversible vision loss in age-related macular degeneration (AMD), it is critical to detect retinal dysfunction before permanent structural loss occurs. In the current study we evaluated a series of visual function tests to identify potential endpoints to detect visual dysfun...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7579935/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33092549 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-020-01683-8 |
_version_ | 1783598695077380096 |
---|---|
author | Narayanan, Divya Rodriguez, John Wallstrom, Garrick Welch, Donna Chapin, Matthew Arrigg, Paul Abelson, Mark |
author_facet | Narayanan, Divya Rodriguez, John Wallstrom, Garrick Welch, Donna Chapin, Matthew Arrigg, Paul Abelson, Mark |
author_sort | Narayanan, Divya |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To prevent irreversible vision loss in age-related macular degeneration (AMD), it is critical to detect retinal dysfunction before permanent structural loss occurs. In the current study we evaluated a series of visual function tests to identify potential endpoints to detect visual dysfunction in non-advanced AMD. METHODS: A series of visual function tests were performed on 23 non-advanced AMD subjects (AREDS grade 1–4 on simplified scale) and 34 age-matched normals (AREDS grade 0). Tests included some commonly used endpoints such as ETDRS visual acuity (VA), low luminance (LL) 2.0ND ETDRS VA, MNREAD as well as newly developed tests such as the Ora-VCF™ test, Ora-tablet reading test, color sensitivity etc. Differences between the two groups were compared for each test. Test-retest repeatability and reproducibility was assessed on a subset of subjects and percent agreement was calculated. RESULTS: There was no difference in standard ETDRS VA between non-advanced AMD (0.06 ± 0.02 logMAR) and normal groups (0.04 ± 0.02 logMAR) (p = 0.57). LL 2.0 ETDRS VA and MNREAD showed no difference between the groups (p > 0.05). Ora-VCF™ test was significantly worse in the non-advanced AMD group compared to normals (0.67 ± 0.07 in AMD; 0.45 ± 0.04 in normals, p = 0.005). Non-advanced AMD subjects also had significantly worse reading performance using the Ora-tablet with LL 2.0ND (114.55 ± 11.22 wpm in AMD; 145.17 ± 9.55 wpm in normals p = 0.049). No significant difference between the groups was noted using other tests. Repeatability was 82% for Ora-VCF™ test and 92% for Ora-tablet LL 2.0ND reading. Reproducibility was 89% for both Ora-VCF™ test and Ora-tablet LL 2.0ND reading. CONCLUSION: While there was no significant difference between non-advanced AMD and normal groups using some current common endpoints such as ETDRS VA, LL 2.0 ETDRS VA or MNREAD, Ora-VCF™ test and Ora-tablet LL 2.0ND reading tests were able to identify significant visual dysfunction in non-advanced AMD subjects. These tests show promise as endpoints for AMD studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7579935 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75799352020-10-22 An exploratory study to evaluate visual function endpoints in non-advanced age-related macular degeneration Narayanan, Divya Rodriguez, John Wallstrom, Garrick Welch, Donna Chapin, Matthew Arrigg, Paul Abelson, Mark BMC Ophthalmol Research Article BACKGROUND: To prevent irreversible vision loss in age-related macular degeneration (AMD), it is critical to detect retinal dysfunction before permanent structural loss occurs. In the current study we evaluated a series of visual function tests to identify potential endpoints to detect visual dysfunction in non-advanced AMD. METHODS: A series of visual function tests were performed on 23 non-advanced AMD subjects (AREDS grade 1–4 on simplified scale) and 34 age-matched normals (AREDS grade 0). Tests included some commonly used endpoints such as ETDRS visual acuity (VA), low luminance (LL) 2.0ND ETDRS VA, MNREAD as well as newly developed tests such as the Ora-VCF™ test, Ora-tablet reading test, color sensitivity etc. Differences between the two groups were compared for each test. Test-retest repeatability and reproducibility was assessed on a subset of subjects and percent agreement was calculated. RESULTS: There was no difference in standard ETDRS VA between non-advanced AMD (0.06 ± 0.02 logMAR) and normal groups (0.04 ± 0.02 logMAR) (p = 0.57). LL 2.0 ETDRS VA and MNREAD showed no difference between the groups (p > 0.05). Ora-VCF™ test was significantly worse in the non-advanced AMD group compared to normals (0.67 ± 0.07 in AMD; 0.45 ± 0.04 in normals, p = 0.005). Non-advanced AMD subjects also had significantly worse reading performance using the Ora-tablet with LL 2.0ND (114.55 ± 11.22 wpm in AMD; 145.17 ± 9.55 wpm in normals p = 0.049). No significant difference between the groups was noted using other tests. Repeatability was 82% for Ora-VCF™ test and 92% for Ora-tablet LL 2.0ND reading. Reproducibility was 89% for both Ora-VCF™ test and Ora-tablet LL 2.0ND reading. CONCLUSION: While there was no significant difference between non-advanced AMD and normal groups using some current common endpoints such as ETDRS VA, LL 2.0 ETDRS VA or MNREAD, Ora-VCF™ test and Ora-tablet LL 2.0ND reading tests were able to identify significant visual dysfunction in non-advanced AMD subjects. These tests show promise as endpoints for AMD studies. BioMed Central 2020-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7579935/ /pubmed/33092549 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-020-01683-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Narayanan, Divya Rodriguez, John Wallstrom, Garrick Welch, Donna Chapin, Matthew Arrigg, Paul Abelson, Mark An exploratory study to evaluate visual function endpoints in non-advanced age-related macular degeneration |
title | An exploratory study to evaluate visual function endpoints in non-advanced age-related macular degeneration |
title_full | An exploratory study to evaluate visual function endpoints in non-advanced age-related macular degeneration |
title_fullStr | An exploratory study to evaluate visual function endpoints in non-advanced age-related macular degeneration |
title_full_unstemmed | An exploratory study to evaluate visual function endpoints in non-advanced age-related macular degeneration |
title_short | An exploratory study to evaluate visual function endpoints in non-advanced age-related macular degeneration |
title_sort | exploratory study to evaluate visual function endpoints in non-advanced age-related macular degeneration |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7579935/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33092549 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-020-01683-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT narayanandivya anexploratorystudytoevaluatevisualfunctionendpointsinnonadvancedagerelatedmaculardegeneration AT rodriguezjohn anexploratorystudytoevaluatevisualfunctionendpointsinnonadvancedagerelatedmaculardegeneration AT wallstromgarrick anexploratorystudytoevaluatevisualfunctionendpointsinnonadvancedagerelatedmaculardegeneration AT welchdonna anexploratorystudytoevaluatevisualfunctionendpointsinnonadvancedagerelatedmaculardegeneration AT chapinmatthew anexploratorystudytoevaluatevisualfunctionendpointsinnonadvancedagerelatedmaculardegeneration AT arriggpaul anexploratorystudytoevaluatevisualfunctionendpointsinnonadvancedagerelatedmaculardegeneration AT abelsonmark anexploratorystudytoevaluatevisualfunctionendpointsinnonadvancedagerelatedmaculardegeneration AT narayanandivya exploratorystudytoevaluatevisualfunctionendpointsinnonadvancedagerelatedmaculardegeneration AT rodriguezjohn exploratorystudytoevaluatevisualfunctionendpointsinnonadvancedagerelatedmaculardegeneration AT wallstromgarrick exploratorystudytoevaluatevisualfunctionendpointsinnonadvancedagerelatedmaculardegeneration AT welchdonna exploratorystudytoevaluatevisualfunctionendpointsinnonadvancedagerelatedmaculardegeneration AT chapinmatthew exploratorystudytoevaluatevisualfunctionendpointsinnonadvancedagerelatedmaculardegeneration AT arriggpaul exploratorystudytoevaluatevisualfunctionendpointsinnonadvancedagerelatedmaculardegeneration AT abelsonmark exploratorystudytoevaluatevisualfunctionendpointsinnonadvancedagerelatedmaculardegeneration |