Cargando…

Not just money: what mothers value in conditional cash transfer programs in India

INTRODUCTION: Conditional cash transfers (CCTs) have become an important policy tool for increasing demand for key maternal and child health services in low/middle-income countries. Yet, these programs have had variable success in increasing service use. Understanding beneficiary preferences for des...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rao, Krishna D, Kachwaha, Shivani, Kaplan, Avril, Bishai, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7580051/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33087391
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003033
_version_ 1783598716178923520
author Rao, Krishna D
Kachwaha, Shivani
Kaplan, Avril
Bishai, David
author_facet Rao, Krishna D
Kachwaha, Shivani
Kaplan, Avril
Bishai, David
author_sort Rao, Krishna D
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Conditional cash transfers (CCTs) have become an important policy tool for increasing demand for key maternal and child health services in low/middle-income countries. Yet, these programs have had variable success in increasing service use. Understanding beneficiary preferences for design features of CCTs can increase program effectiveness. METHODS: We conducted a Discrete choice experiment in two districts of Uttar Pradesh, India in 2018 with 405 mothers with young children (<3 years). Respondents were asked to choose between hypothetical CCT programme profiles described in terms of five attribute levels (cash, antenatal care visits, growth-monitoring and immunisation visits, visit duration and health benefit received) and responses were analysed using mixed logit regression. RESULTS: Mothers most valued the cash transfer amount, followed by the health benefit received from services. Mothers did not have a strong preference for conditionalities related to the number of health centre visits or for time spent seeking care; however, service delivery points were in close proximity to households. Mothers were willing to accept lower cash rewards for better perceived health benefits—they were willing to accept 2854 Indian rupees ($41) less for a programme that produced good health, which is about half the amount currently offered by India’s Maternal Benefits Program. Mothers who had low utilisation of health services, and those from poor households, valued the cash transfer and the health benefit significantly more than others. CONCLUSION: Both cash transfers and the perceived health benefit from services are highly valued, particularly by infrequent service users. In CCTs, this highlights the importance of communicating value of services to beneficiaries by informing about health benefits of services and providing quality care. Conditionalities requiring frequent health centre visits or time taken for seeking care may not have large negative effects on CCT participation in contexts of good service coverage.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7580051
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75800512020-10-27 Not just money: what mothers value in conditional cash transfer programs in India Rao, Krishna D Kachwaha, Shivani Kaplan, Avril Bishai, David BMJ Glob Health Original Research INTRODUCTION: Conditional cash transfers (CCTs) have become an important policy tool for increasing demand for key maternal and child health services in low/middle-income countries. Yet, these programs have had variable success in increasing service use. Understanding beneficiary preferences for design features of CCTs can increase program effectiveness. METHODS: We conducted a Discrete choice experiment in two districts of Uttar Pradesh, India in 2018 with 405 mothers with young children (<3 years). Respondents were asked to choose between hypothetical CCT programme profiles described in terms of five attribute levels (cash, antenatal care visits, growth-monitoring and immunisation visits, visit duration and health benefit received) and responses were analysed using mixed logit regression. RESULTS: Mothers most valued the cash transfer amount, followed by the health benefit received from services. Mothers did not have a strong preference for conditionalities related to the number of health centre visits or for time spent seeking care; however, service delivery points were in close proximity to households. Mothers were willing to accept lower cash rewards for better perceived health benefits—they were willing to accept 2854 Indian rupees ($41) less for a programme that produced good health, which is about half the amount currently offered by India’s Maternal Benefits Program. Mothers who had low utilisation of health services, and those from poor households, valued the cash transfer and the health benefit significantly more than others. CONCLUSION: Both cash transfers and the perceived health benefit from services are highly valued, particularly by infrequent service users. In CCTs, this highlights the importance of communicating value of services to beneficiaries by informing about health benefits of services and providing quality care. Conditionalities requiring frequent health centre visits or time taken for seeking care may not have large negative effects on CCT participation in contexts of good service coverage. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7580051/ /pubmed/33087391 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003033 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Research
Rao, Krishna D
Kachwaha, Shivani
Kaplan, Avril
Bishai, David
Not just money: what mothers value in conditional cash transfer programs in India
title Not just money: what mothers value in conditional cash transfer programs in India
title_full Not just money: what mothers value in conditional cash transfer programs in India
title_fullStr Not just money: what mothers value in conditional cash transfer programs in India
title_full_unstemmed Not just money: what mothers value in conditional cash transfer programs in India
title_short Not just money: what mothers value in conditional cash transfer programs in India
title_sort not just money: what mothers value in conditional cash transfer programs in india
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7580051/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33087391
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003033
work_keys_str_mv AT raokrishnad notjustmoneywhatmothersvalueinconditionalcashtransferprogramsinindia
AT kachwahashivani notjustmoneywhatmothersvalueinconditionalcashtransferprogramsinindia
AT kaplanavril notjustmoneywhatmothersvalueinconditionalcashtransferprogramsinindia
AT bishaidavid notjustmoneywhatmothersvalueinconditionalcashtransferprogramsinindia