Cargando…
BARE SPOT LOCATION IN GLENOID CAVITY: COMPARISON BETWEEN ARTHROSCOPY AND CT SCAN
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether Bare Spot is previously displaced by proportion (MEASURE BP-A × 1.25/MEASURE BP-P = 1). METHODS: 35 patients with surgical indication for rotator cuff injury repair were evaluated. The distances from the Bare Spot to the anterior edge of the glenoid cavity (BS-A) and to...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
ATHA EDITORA
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7580293/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33144840 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220202805232045 |
_version_ | 1783598759729430528 |
---|---|
author | RAMOS, MAX ROGÉRIO FREITAS HIDALGO, PEDRO FILGUEIRAS FAGUNDES, DIOGO SAN, YONDER ARCHANJO CHING |
author_facet | RAMOS, MAX ROGÉRIO FREITAS HIDALGO, PEDRO FILGUEIRAS FAGUNDES, DIOGO SAN, YONDER ARCHANJO CHING |
author_sort | RAMOS, MAX ROGÉRIO FREITAS |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To assess whether Bare Spot is previously displaced by proportion (MEASURE BP-A × 1.25/MEASURE BP-P = 1). METHODS: 35 patients with surgical indication for rotator cuff injury repair were evaluated. The distances from the Bare Spot to the anterior edge of the glenoid cavity (BS-A) and to the posterior edge (BS-P) were measured by arthroscopy and computed tomography with three-dimensional reconstruction of the scapula. RESULTS: The distance from the Bare Spot to the anterior border (BS-A tc) was 11.6 mm with a median 12 mm; The distance to the posterior border (BS-P tc) was on average 15.5 mm with a median 15 mm. The distances from BS to anterior cavity edge measured by arthroscopy were on average (BS-A video) 12.25 mm with a median of 12 mm, and from BS to posterior edge (BS-P video) 16.25 mm on average with median 16 mm (p < 0.005). CONCLUSION: Bare Spot is displaced anteriorly at a proportion of 40% of the anterior margin and 60% of the posterior margin. Level of Evidence II - Development of diagnostic criteria on consecutive patients (with universally applied reference “gold standard”). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7580293 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | ATHA EDITORA |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75802932020-11-02 BARE SPOT LOCATION IN GLENOID CAVITY: COMPARISON BETWEEN ARTHROSCOPY AND CT SCAN RAMOS, MAX ROGÉRIO FREITAS HIDALGO, PEDRO FILGUEIRAS FAGUNDES, DIOGO SAN, YONDER ARCHANJO CHING Acta Ortop Bras Original Article OBJECTIVE: To assess whether Bare Spot is previously displaced by proportion (MEASURE BP-A × 1.25/MEASURE BP-P = 1). METHODS: 35 patients with surgical indication for rotator cuff injury repair were evaluated. The distances from the Bare Spot to the anterior edge of the glenoid cavity (BS-A) and to the posterior edge (BS-P) were measured by arthroscopy and computed tomography with three-dimensional reconstruction of the scapula. RESULTS: The distance from the Bare Spot to the anterior border (BS-A tc) was 11.6 mm with a median 12 mm; The distance to the posterior border (BS-P tc) was on average 15.5 mm with a median 15 mm. The distances from BS to anterior cavity edge measured by arthroscopy were on average (BS-A video) 12.25 mm with a median of 12 mm, and from BS to posterior edge (BS-P video) 16.25 mm on average with median 16 mm (p < 0.005). CONCLUSION: Bare Spot is displaced anteriorly at a proportion of 40% of the anterior margin and 60% of the posterior margin. Level of Evidence II - Development of diagnostic criteria on consecutive patients (with universally applied reference “gold standard”). ATHA EDITORA 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7580293/ /pubmed/33144840 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220202805232045 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License |
spellingShingle | Original Article RAMOS, MAX ROGÉRIO FREITAS HIDALGO, PEDRO FILGUEIRAS FAGUNDES, DIOGO SAN, YONDER ARCHANJO CHING BARE SPOT LOCATION IN GLENOID CAVITY: COMPARISON BETWEEN ARTHROSCOPY AND CT SCAN |
title | BARE SPOT LOCATION IN GLENOID CAVITY: COMPARISON BETWEEN ARTHROSCOPY AND CT SCAN |
title_full | BARE SPOT LOCATION IN GLENOID CAVITY: COMPARISON BETWEEN ARTHROSCOPY AND CT SCAN |
title_fullStr | BARE SPOT LOCATION IN GLENOID CAVITY: COMPARISON BETWEEN ARTHROSCOPY AND CT SCAN |
title_full_unstemmed | BARE SPOT LOCATION IN GLENOID CAVITY: COMPARISON BETWEEN ARTHROSCOPY AND CT SCAN |
title_short | BARE SPOT LOCATION IN GLENOID CAVITY: COMPARISON BETWEEN ARTHROSCOPY AND CT SCAN |
title_sort | bare spot location in glenoid cavity: comparison between arthroscopy and ct scan |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7580293/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33144840 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220202805232045 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ramosmaxrogeriofreitas barespotlocationinglenoidcavitycomparisonbetweenarthroscopyandctscan AT hidalgopedrofilgueiras barespotlocationinglenoidcavitycomparisonbetweenarthroscopyandctscan AT fagundesdiogo barespotlocationinglenoidcavitycomparisonbetweenarthroscopyandctscan AT sanyonderarchanjoching barespotlocationinglenoidcavitycomparisonbetweenarthroscopyandctscan |