Cargando…

BARE SPOT LOCATION IN GLENOID CAVITY: COMPARISON BETWEEN ARTHROSCOPY AND CT SCAN

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether Bare Spot is previously displaced by proportion (MEASURE BP-A × 1.25/MEASURE BP-P = 1). METHODS: 35 patients with surgical indication for rotator cuff injury repair were evaluated. The distances from the Bare Spot to the anterior edge of the glenoid cavity (BS-A) and to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: RAMOS, MAX ROGÉRIO FREITAS, HIDALGO, PEDRO FILGUEIRAS, FAGUNDES, DIOGO, SAN, YONDER ARCHANJO CHING
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: ATHA EDITORA 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7580293/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33144840
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220202805232045
_version_ 1783598759729430528
author RAMOS, MAX ROGÉRIO FREITAS
HIDALGO, PEDRO FILGUEIRAS
FAGUNDES, DIOGO
SAN, YONDER ARCHANJO CHING
author_facet RAMOS, MAX ROGÉRIO FREITAS
HIDALGO, PEDRO FILGUEIRAS
FAGUNDES, DIOGO
SAN, YONDER ARCHANJO CHING
author_sort RAMOS, MAX ROGÉRIO FREITAS
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To assess whether Bare Spot is previously displaced by proportion (MEASURE BP-A × 1.25/MEASURE BP-P = 1). METHODS: 35 patients with surgical indication for rotator cuff injury repair were evaluated. The distances from the Bare Spot to the anterior edge of the glenoid cavity (BS-A) and to the posterior edge (BS-P) were measured by arthroscopy and computed tomography with three-dimensional reconstruction of the scapula. RESULTS: The distance from the Bare Spot to the anterior border (BS-A tc) was 11.6 mm with a median 12 mm; The distance to the posterior border (BS-P tc) was on average 15.5 mm with a median 15 mm. The distances from BS to anterior cavity edge measured by arthroscopy were on average (BS-A video) 12.25 mm with a median of 12 mm, and from BS to posterior edge (BS-P video) 16.25 mm on average with median 16 mm (p < 0.005). CONCLUSION: Bare Spot is displaced anteriorly at a proportion of 40% of the anterior margin and 60% of the posterior margin. Level of Evidence II - Development of diagnostic criteria on consecutive patients (with universally applied reference “gold standard”).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7580293
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher ATHA EDITORA
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75802932020-11-02 BARE SPOT LOCATION IN GLENOID CAVITY: COMPARISON BETWEEN ARTHROSCOPY AND CT SCAN RAMOS, MAX ROGÉRIO FREITAS HIDALGO, PEDRO FILGUEIRAS FAGUNDES, DIOGO SAN, YONDER ARCHANJO CHING Acta Ortop Bras Original Article OBJECTIVE: To assess whether Bare Spot is previously displaced by proportion (MEASURE BP-A × 1.25/MEASURE BP-P = 1). METHODS: 35 patients with surgical indication for rotator cuff injury repair were evaluated. The distances from the Bare Spot to the anterior edge of the glenoid cavity (BS-A) and to the posterior edge (BS-P) were measured by arthroscopy and computed tomography with three-dimensional reconstruction of the scapula. RESULTS: The distance from the Bare Spot to the anterior border (BS-A tc) was 11.6 mm with a median 12 mm; The distance to the posterior border (BS-P tc) was on average 15.5 mm with a median 15 mm. The distances from BS to anterior cavity edge measured by arthroscopy were on average (BS-A video) 12.25 mm with a median of 12 mm, and from BS to posterior edge (BS-P video) 16.25 mm on average with median 16 mm (p < 0.005). CONCLUSION: Bare Spot is displaced anteriorly at a proportion of 40% of the anterior margin and 60% of the posterior margin. Level of Evidence II - Development of diagnostic criteria on consecutive patients (with universally applied reference “gold standard”). ATHA EDITORA 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7580293/ /pubmed/33144840 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220202805232045 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
spellingShingle Original Article
RAMOS, MAX ROGÉRIO FREITAS
HIDALGO, PEDRO FILGUEIRAS
FAGUNDES, DIOGO
SAN, YONDER ARCHANJO CHING
BARE SPOT LOCATION IN GLENOID CAVITY: COMPARISON BETWEEN ARTHROSCOPY AND CT SCAN
title BARE SPOT LOCATION IN GLENOID CAVITY: COMPARISON BETWEEN ARTHROSCOPY AND CT SCAN
title_full BARE SPOT LOCATION IN GLENOID CAVITY: COMPARISON BETWEEN ARTHROSCOPY AND CT SCAN
title_fullStr BARE SPOT LOCATION IN GLENOID CAVITY: COMPARISON BETWEEN ARTHROSCOPY AND CT SCAN
title_full_unstemmed BARE SPOT LOCATION IN GLENOID CAVITY: COMPARISON BETWEEN ARTHROSCOPY AND CT SCAN
title_short BARE SPOT LOCATION IN GLENOID CAVITY: COMPARISON BETWEEN ARTHROSCOPY AND CT SCAN
title_sort bare spot location in glenoid cavity: comparison between arthroscopy and ct scan
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7580293/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33144840
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220202805232045
work_keys_str_mv AT ramosmaxrogeriofreitas barespotlocationinglenoidcavitycomparisonbetweenarthroscopyandctscan
AT hidalgopedrofilgueiras barespotlocationinglenoidcavitycomparisonbetweenarthroscopyandctscan
AT fagundesdiogo barespotlocationinglenoidcavitycomparisonbetweenarthroscopyandctscan
AT sanyonderarchanjoching barespotlocationinglenoidcavitycomparisonbetweenarthroscopyandctscan