Cargando…

INTER- AND INTRA-OBSERVER RELIABILITY OF SCHATZKER, AO, AND LUO CLASSIFICATIONS FOR TIBIAL PLATEAU FRACTURES

OBJECTIVE: To verify inter- and intra-observer agreement of three classification systems for tibial plateau fractures - Schatzker, AO/ASIF, and Luo’s - among orthopedic surgery residents. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted with 29 observers. Radiographic and tomographic imaging of the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: ALENCAR, JONATAS BRITO DE, SOUZA, CLODOALDO JOSÉ DUARTE DE, COELHO, PEDRO RAFAEL REIS, FREITAS, PEDRO GOMES DE, LOPES, MÁRCIO BEZERRA GADELHA, PINTO, FRANCISCO JOSÉ MAIA
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: ATHA EDITORA 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7580299/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33144835
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220202805228092
_version_ 1783598761094676480
author ALENCAR, JONATAS BRITO DE
SOUZA, CLODOALDO JOSÉ DUARTE DE
COELHO, PEDRO RAFAEL REIS
FREITAS, PEDRO GOMES DE
LOPES, MÁRCIO BEZERRA GADELHA
PINTO, FRANCISCO JOSÉ MAIA
author_facet ALENCAR, JONATAS BRITO DE
SOUZA, CLODOALDO JOSÉ DUARTE DE
COELHO, PEDRO RAFAEL REIS
FREITAS, PEDRO GOMES DE
LOPES, MÁRCIO BEZERRA GADELHA
PINTO, FRANCISCO JOSÉ MAIA
author_sort ALENCAR, JONATAS BRITO DE
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To verify inter- and intra-observer agreement of three classification systems for tibial plateau fractures - Schatzker, AO/ASIF, and Luo’s - among orthopedic surgery residents. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted with 29 observers. Radiographic and tomographic imaging of the knee of 15 patients presenting with fractures were evaluated. After six weeks, the test was reapplied. The level of agreement was calculated by the Kappa index. RESULTS: In test 1, inter-observer agreement of all residents, according to the Kappa index, for Schatzker classification was 0.226, for AO 0.431, and Luo’s 0.319. In test 2, values were 0.316, 0.333, and 0.347, respectively (p < 0.001). Regarding intra-observer analysis, the mean Kappa indexes of 1(st)-year residents were: Schatzker, 0.20; AO, 0.32; and Luo’s, 0.3. For 2(nd)-year residents, means were: 0.51, 0.58, and 0.38, respectively. As for 3(rd)-year, results were 0.42, 0.42, and 0.41, respectively (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: AO/ASIF showed a better reproducibility than other classifications, with substantial inter- and intra-observer agreement. We also found a stronger agreement among 2(nd)- and 3(rd)-year residents. Level of Evidence III, Diagnostic Studies - Investigating a Diagnostic Test.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7580299
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher ATHA EDITORA
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75802992020-11-02 INTER- AND INTRA-OBSERVER RELIABILITY OF SCHATZKER, AO, AND LUO CLASSIFICATIONS FOR TIBIAL PLATEAU FRACTURES ALENCAR, JONATAS BRITO DE SOUZA, CLODOALDO JOSÉ DUARTE DE COELHO, PEDRO RAFAEL REIS FREITAS, PEDRO GOMES DE LOPES, MÁRCIO BEZERRA GADELHA PINTO, FRANCISCO JOSÉ MAIA Acta Ortop Bras Original Article OBJECTIVE: To verify inter- and intra-observer agreement of three classification systems for tibial plateau fractures - Schatzker, AO/ASIF, and Luo’s - among orthopedic surgery residents. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted with 29 observers. Radiographic and tomographic imaging of the knee of 15 patients presenting with fractures were evaluated. After six weeks, the test was reapplied. The level of agreement was calculated by the Kappa index. RESULTS: In test 1, inter-observer agreement of all residents, according to the Kappa index, for Schatzker classification was 0.226, for AO 0.431, and Luo’s 0.319. In test 2, values were 0.316, 0.333, and 0.347, respectively (p < 0.001). Regarding intra-observer analysis, the mean Kappa indexes of 1(st)-year residents were: Schatzker, 0.20; AO, 0.32; and Luo’s, 0.3. For 2(nd)-year residents, means were: 0.51, 0.58, and 0.38, respectively. As for 3(rd)-year, results were 0.42, 0.42, and 0.41, respectively (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: AO/ASIF showed a better reproducibility than other classifications, with substantial inter- and intra-observer agreement. We also found a stronger agreement among 2(nd)- and 3(rd)-year residents. Level of Evidence III, Diagnostic Studies - Investigating a Diagnostic Test. ATHA EDITORA 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7580299/ /pubmed/33144835 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220202805228092 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
spellingShingle Original Article
ALENCAR, JONATAS BRITO DE
SOUZA, CLODOALDO JOSÉ DUARTE DE
COELHO, PEDRO RAFAEL REIS
FREITAS, PEDRO GOMES DE
LOPES, MÁRCIO BEZERRA GADELHA
PINTO, FRANCISCO JOSÉ MAIA
INTER- AND INTRA-OBSERVER RELIABILITY OF SCHATZKER, AO, AND LUO CLASSIFICATIONS FOR TIBIAL PLATEAU FRACTURES
title INTER- AND INTRA-OBSERVER RELIABILITY OF SCHATZKER, AO, AND LUO CLASSIFICATIONS FOR TIBIAL PLATEAU FRACTURES
title_full INTER- AND INTRA-OBSERVER RELIABILITY OF SCHATZKER, AO, AND LUO CLASSIFICATIONS FOR TIBIAL PLATEAU FRACTURES
title_fullStr INTER- AND INTRA-OBSERVER RELIABILITY OF SCHATZKER, AO, AND LUO CLASSIFICATIONS FOR TIBIAL PLATEAU FRACTURES
title_full_unstemmed INTER- AND INTRA-OBSERVER RELIABILITY OF SCHATZKER, AO, AND LUO CLASSIFICATIONS FOR TIBIAL PLATEAU FRACTURES
title_short INTER- AND INTRA-OBSERVER RELIABILITY OF SCHATZKER, AO, AND LUO CLASSIFICATIONS FOR TIBIAL PLATEAU FRACTURES
title_sort inter- and intra-observer reliability of schatzker, ao, and luo classifications for tibial plateau fractures
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7580299/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33144835
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220202805228092
work_keys_str_mv AT alencarjonatasbritode interandintraobserverreliabilityofschatzkeraoandluoclassificationsfortibialplateaufractures
AT souzaclodoaldojoseduartede interandintraobserverreliabilityofschatzkeraoandluoclassificationsfortibialplateaufractures
AT coelhopedrorafaelreis interandintraobserverreliabilityofschatzkeraoandluoclassificationsfortibialplateaufractures
AT freitaspedrogomesde interandintraobserverreliabilityofschatzkeraoandluoclassificationsfortibialplateaufractures
AT lopesmarciobezerragadelha interandintraobserverreliabilityofschatzkeraoandluoclassificationsfortibialplateaufractures
AT pintofranciscojosemaia interandintraobserverreliabilityofschatzkeraoandluoclassificationsfortibialplateaufractures