Cargando…

Cryptosporidium Infections in Africa—How Important Is Zoonotic Transmission? A Review of the Evidence

Cryptosporidium, a protozoan parasite in the phylum Apicomplexa, is the etiological agent of cryptosporidiosis, an intestinal infection characterized by profuse watery diarrhea. Over 30 species of Cryptosporidium are recognized, some host specific whereas others infect a broader host range. Cryptosp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Robertson, Lucy J., Johansen, Øystein Haarklau, Kifleyohannes, Tsegabirhan, Efunshile, Akinwale Michael, Terefe, Getachew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7580383/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33195574
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.575881
_version_ 1783598780775399424
author Robertson, Lucy J.
Johansen, Øystein Haarklau
Kifleyohannes, Tsegabirhan
Efunshile, Akinwale Michael
Terefe, Getachew
author_facet Robertson, Lucy J.
Johansen, Øystein Haarklau
Kifleyohannes, Tsegabirhan
Efunshile, Akinwale Michael
Terefe, Getachew
author_sort Robertson, Lucy J.
collection PubMed
description Cryptosporidium, a protozoan parasite in the phylum Apicomplexa, is the etiological agent of cryptosporidiosis, an intestinal infection characterized by profuse watery diarrhea. Over 30 species of Cryptosporidium are recognized, some host specific whereas others infect a broader host range. Cryptosporidium hominis and Cryptosporidium parvum are the species most commonly associated with human infection; C. hominis is largely associated only with human infections, but C. parvum is also associated with infection in animals, especially young ruminants. In some regions, cryptosporidiosis is a serious veterinary problem, particularly for calves, and lambs. Many outbreaks of human cryptosporidiosis have been associated with zoonotic transmission following contact with infected animals. In Africa, where cryptosporidiosis is a major contributor to pediatric morbidity and mortality, evidence suggests transmission is principally anthroponotic. Given the frequent close contact between humans and animals in Africa, the apparent predominance of human-to-human transmission is both interesting and puzzling. In this article, after a brief “text book” introduction to the parasite, we consider in separate sections the different aspects of relevance to Cryptosporidium transmission in African countries, describing different aspects of the various species and subtypes in human and animal infections, considering livestock management practices in different African countries, and looking for any characteristic “hot spots” where zoonotic transmission has apparently occurred. Studies where transmission networks have been investigated are particularly relevant. Finally, in a separate section, we try to gather these different strands of evidence together in order to assess the reasons behind the apparent predominance of anthroponotic transmission in Africa. Reviewing the available evidence provides an opportunity to re-think transmission pathways, not only in Africa but also elsewhere, and also to pose questions. Does the predominance of human-to-human transmission in Africa reflect a relative absence of zoonotic C. parvum in African livestock? Are Africans less susceptible to zoonotic Cryptosporidium infection, perhaps resulting from early immunostimulation by C. hominis or due to inherent genetic traits? Is the African environment—in all its variety—simply more detrimental to oocyst survival? Will the so-called hypertransmissible subtypes, currently relatively rare in Africa, be introduced from Europe or elsewhere, and, if so, will they fade out or establish and spread? Our intention with this manuscript is not only to summarize and consolidate diverse data, thereby providing an overview of data gaps, but also to provide food for thought regarding transmission of a parasite that continues to have a considerable impact on both human and animal health.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7580383
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75803832020-11-13 Cryptosporidium Infections in Africa—How Important Is Zoonotic Transmission? A Review of the Evidence Robertson, Lucy J. Johansen, Øystein Haarklau Kifleyohannes, Tsegabirhan Efunshile, Akinwale Michael Terefe, Getachew Front Vet Sci Veterinary Science Cryptosporidium, a protozoan parasite in the phylum Apicomplexa, is the etiological agent of cryptosporidiosis, an intestinal infection characterized by profuse watery diarrhea. Over 30 species of Cryptosporidium are recognized, some host specific whereas others infect a broader host range. Cryptosporidium hominis and Cryptosporidium parvum are the species most commonly associated with human infection; C. hominis is largely associated only with human infections, but C. parvum is also associated with infection in animals, especially young ruminants. In some regions, cryptosporidiosis is a serious veterinary problem, particularly for calves, and lambs. Many outbreaks of human cryptosporidiosis have been associated with zoonotic transmission following contact with infected animals. In Africa, where cryptosporidiosis is a major contributor to pediatric morbidity and mortality, evidence suggests transmission is principally anthroponotic. Given the frequent close contact between humans and animals in Africa, the apparent predominance of human-to-human transmission is both interesting and puzzling. In this article, after a brief “text book” introduction to the parasite, we consider in separate sections the different aspects of relevance to Cryptosporidium transmission in African countries, describing different aspects of the various species and subtypes in human and animal infections, considering livestock management practices in different African countries, and looking for any characteristic “hot spots” where zoonotic transmission has apparently occurred. Studies where transmission networks have been investigated are particularly relevant. Finally, in a separate section, we try to gather these different strands of evidence together in order to assess the reasons behind the apparent predominance of anthroponotic transmission in Africa. Reviewing the available evidence provides an opportunity to re-think transmission pathways, not only in Africa but also elsewhere, and also to pose questions. Does the predominance of human-to-human transmission in Africa reflect a relative absence of zoonotic C. parvum in African livestock? Are Africans less susceptible to zoonotic Cryptosporidium infection, perhaps resulting from early immunostimulation by C. hominis or due to inherent genetic traits? Is the African environment—in all its variety—simply more detrimental to oocyst survival? Will the so-called hypertransmissible subtypes, currently relatively rare in Africa, be introduced from Europe or elsewhere, and, if so, will they fade out or establish and spread? Our intention with this manuscript is not only to summarize and consolidate diverse data, thereby providing an overview of data gaps, but also to provide food for thought regarding transmission of a parasite that continues to have a considerable impact on both human and animal health. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7580383/ /pubmed/33195574 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.575881 Text en Copyright © 2020 Robertson, Johansen, Kifleyohannes, Efunshile and Terefe. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Veterinary Science
Robertson, Lucy J.
Johansen, Øystein Haarklau
Kifleyohannes, Tsegabirhan
Efunshile, Akinwale Michael
Terefe, Getachew
Cryptosporidium Infections in Africa—How Important Is Zoonotic Transmission? A Review of the Evidence
title Cryptosporidium Infections in Africa—How Important Is Zoonotic Transmission? A Review of the Evidence
title_full Cryptosporidium Infections in Africa—How Important Is Zoonotic Transmission? A Review of the Evidence
title_fullStr Cryptosporidium Infections in Africa—How Important Is Zoonotic Transmission? A Review of the Evidence
title_full_unstemmed Cryptosporidium Infections in Africa—How Important Is Zoonotic Transmission? A Review of the Evidence
title_short Cryptosporidium Infections in Africa—How Important Is Zoonotic Transmission? A Review of the Evidence
title_sort cryptosporidium infections in africa—how important is zoonotic transmission? a review of the evidence
topic Veterinary Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7580383/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33195574
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.575881
work_keys_str_mv AT robertsonlucyj cryptosporidiuminfectionsinafricahowimportantiszoonotictransmissionareviewoftheevidence
AT johansenøysteinhaarklau cryptosporidiuminfectionsinafricahowimportantiszoonotictransmissionareviewoftheevidence
AT kifleyohannestsegabirhan cryptosporidiuminfectionsinafricahowimportantiszoonotictransmissionareviewoftheevidence
AT efunshileakinwalemichael cryptosporidiuminfectionsinafricahowimportantiszoonotictransmissionareviewoftheevidence
AT terefegetachew cryptosporidiuminfectionsinafricahowimportantiszoonotictransmissionareviewoftheevidence